[Bug 1515278] Re: [SRU] rabbit queues should expire when unused

@niedbalski FYI, tempest results from wily-liberty-proposed and trusty- liberty staging are consistent with wily-liberty (distro) and trusty- liberty (uca updates). ie. No new failures. Now that it has been promoted to trusty-liberty-proposed, we will need to re-test there. There is typically

[Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

squid3-3.5.12-1ubuntu3 uploaded already by stgraber handled using the dpkg-maintscript-helper to clean up the old /etc/init.d/squid3 file. This debdiff handles the second task of removing the check on how to restart squid and just calls invoke-rc.d squid restart unconditionally. I've tested this

[Bug 1555700] Re: Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

Now with less libaio-dev in control file for no AIO. Thanks for catching my mistake ** Patch added: "old_ubuntu-new_ubuntu.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/+bug/1555700/+attachment/4616629/+files/old_ubuntu-new_ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification

Re: [Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Steve Langasek < steve.langa...@canonical.com> wrote: > Ryan, for ease of review and sponsorship please provide an incremental > debdiff against the package that's already in xenial-proposed. > I actually did in comment 18, but I didn't know that

Re: [Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

As far as I can see, the entire versioned code block here is wrong, and > you should *only* be restarting squid. > > The block (without my addition) is from debian itself. The original block that's present in debian: update-rc.d squid defaults 30 >/dev/null if test -d /etc/squid3 && dpkg

[Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

I've attached new debdiff integrating the change to the squid.postinst fix. We would like to get this build uploaded into proposed (and locked as the current one is) to continue wider testing of the new squid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

Old Ubuntu to New Ubuntu debdiff ** Patch added: "old-ubuntu-to-new-ubuntu.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1473691/+attachment/4616441/+files/old-ubuntu-to-new-ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

Old Ubuntu to New Debian debdiff ** Patch added: "old-ubuntu-to-new-debian.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1473691/+attachment/4616440/+files/old-ubuntu-to-new-debian.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 1555700] Re: Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

Dropped AIO enablement; while the feature was isolated, we've had no testing on the aio backend; we can always enable it later if we get enough testing to ensure proper functionality. Therefore dropping the FFE and just requesting a merge with Debian. ** Changed in: tgt (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 1555700] Re: [FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

Old Ubuntu -> New Debian debdiff ** Patch added: "old_ubuntu-new_debian.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/+bug/1555700/+attachment/4616323/+files/old_ubuntu-new_debian.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1555700] Re: [FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

Old Ubuntu to New Ubuntu ** Patch added: "old_ubuntu-new_ubuntu.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/+bug/1555700/+attachment/4616324/+files/old_ubuntu-new_ubuntu.debdiff ** Summary changed: - [FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable) + Please merge tgt 1.0.63

[Bug 1546445] Re: support vhost user without specifying vhostforce

FYI, following additional regression tests, today we promoted qemu 2.2 +dfsg-5expubuntu9.7~cloud2 from kilo-proposed to kilo-updates in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. ** Changed in: cloud-archive/kilo Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1393391] Re: neutron-openvswitch-agent stuck on no queue 'q-agent-notifier-port-update_fanout..

FYI, following additional regression tests, today we promoted neutron 2014.1.5-0ubuntu4~cloud0 from proposed to icehouse-updates in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to neutron in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1473691] Re: [FFe] squid: Update to latest upstream release (3.5)

Kick, Thanks for the thorough upgrade test. I was able to recreate and debug the proposed package install script. It appears that the squid.postinst expects to find a /etc/init.d/squid3 service script if we also have an existing /etc/squid3 directory. However, in my testing, we do have the

[Bug 1560939] Re: libvirt-bin fails to install on a fresh xenial server

This error was unrelated to libvirt-bin itself, rather the locales package from glibc in Xenial had an issue with generating locales (and locale-archive); This was fixed in a new release (on 3/23) and subsequent cloud builds after 3/22 which have newer glibc locales package do not experience this

[Bug 1555700] Re: [FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

Linking against libaio allows tgt to use libaio as a backend for submitting IO to the backing device. The default backend uses pread64/pwrite64. Adding an additional backed does not change this default For users to consume the aio backend, they must specify the backend type via command line

[Bug 1555700] Re: [FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

Discussion from #ubuntu-release rharper: As for the AIO thing, as you understand the code, what are the odds this could have a negative impact on users of other backends if the AIO stuff is broken? rharper: If you're 99% confident that the change is meaningless for people who don't use the

[Bug 1559775] Re: package slapd 2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

from DpkgTerminalLog: Setting up slapd (2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu3) ... Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.d in /var/backups/slapd-2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8.2... done. Moving old database directories to /var/backups: Backup path /var/backups/dc=nodomain-2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu8.2.ldapdb exists. Giving up...

[Bug 1540407] Re: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device

Here's my initial test with the merged multipath-tools test. I had the FCP devices enabled with the 0.5.0+git-1ubuntu2 package installed from the merges ppa and rebooted the system. After booting, I confirmed the paths were up, then used a vmcp command to disconnect the devices. I then queried

[Bug 1550646] Re: package exim4-daemon-light 4.86-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 137

** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to exim4 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550646 Title: package exim4-daemon-light 4.86-3ubuntu1 failed to

[Bug 1555700] Re: [FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

Install log of tgt 1.0.63-1ubuntu1 under lxd machine container. ** Attachment added: "install.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/+bug/1555700/+attachment/4595176/+files/install.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1555700] Re: [FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

sbuild build log of 1.0.63-1ubuntu1 on amd64 ** Attachment added: "tgt_1.0.63-1ubuntu1_amd64-20160309-1702.build" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/+bug/1555700/+attachment/4595175/+files/tgt_1.0.63-1ubuntu1_amd64-20160309-1702.build -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1555700] Re: [FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

debdiff (old/ubuntu) 1.0.62-1ubuntu1 to (new/ubuntu) 1.0.63-1ubuntu1 ** Patch added: "old_ubuntu-new_ubuntu.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/+bug/1555700/+attachment/4595174/+files/old_ubuntu-new_ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1555700] Re: [FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

debdiff (old/ubuntu) 1.0.62-1ubuntu1 to (new/debian) 1.0.63-1 ** Patch added: "old_ubuntu-new_debian.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/+bug/1555700/+attachment/4595173/+files/old_ubuntu-new_debian.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1555700] [NEW] [FFE] Please merge tgt 1.0.63 from Debian (unstable)

Public bug reported: New Upstream release which incorporates one outstanding patch in 1.0.62 and adds support for AIO backend for tgt. ** Affects: tgt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 1540407] Re: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device

Thorsten, Here's my PPA with the merged multipath-tools package for s390x: https://launchpad.net/~raharper/+archive/ubuntu/merges/ You can add it via: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:raharper/merges sudo apt-get update sudo apt-cache policy multipath-tools The last command should show you a newer

[Bug 1540407] Re: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device

Hi Thorsten, We're going to merge with upstream debian. That work is tracked under bug 1551952. I'm now working on getting an s390x build of the package and reproducing on one of the systems to help test that the merge addresses this bug (and doesn't regress anything as well). -- You

[Bug 1551952] Re: FFE: Please merge multipath-tools 0.5.0+git1.656f8865 from Debian unstable

dpkg install of kpartx and multipath-tools on Xenial amd64 kvm VM. ** Attachment added: "install.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1551952/+attachment/4594203/+files/install.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 1551952] Re: FFE: Please merge multipath-tools 0.5.0+git1.656f8865 from Debian unstable

debdiff old/ubuntu (0.5.0-7ubuntu16 ) to new/debian (0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5) ** Patch added: "old_ubuntu-new_debian.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1551952/+attachment/4594201/+files/old_ubuntu-new_debian.debdiff -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1551952] Re: FFE: Please merge multipath-tools 0.5.0+git1.656f8865 from Debian unstable

I've run the package under adt-run and it passes. After installing and running in a VM using virtio-scsi configured as multipath, I can successfully find the devices configure. ubuntu@mp1:~$ dpkg --list | grep multipath-tools ii multipath-tools 0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5ubuntu2

[Bug 1551952] Re: FFE: Please merge multipath-tools 0.5.0+git1.656f8865 from Debian unstable

sbuild log of updated multipath-tools ** Attachment added: "multipath-tools_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5ubuntu2_amd64-20160309-1159.build"

[Bug 1551952] Re: FFE: Please merge multipath-tools 0.5.0+git1.656f8865 from Debian unstable

debdiff from old/ubuntu (0.5.0-7ubuntu16) to new/ubuntu (0.5.0+git1.656f8865-5ubuntu1) ** Patch added: "old_ubuntu-new_ubuntu.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1551952/+attachment/4594200/+files/old_ubuntu-new_ubuntu.debdiff -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 1401190] Re: curtin makes assumptions about partition names on all devices

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Rob Sanderson <1401...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > This appears to have fixed the nvme partition problem but, I'm sure > there are nicer ways to do it. > > Hi Rob! Thanks for confirming a workaround. > root@maas1:~# diff

Re: [Bug 1401190] Re: curtin makes assumptions about partition names on all devices

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Rob Sanderson <1401...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > Thanks, let me know if you need me to make any changes or run through > any tests. > > A quick question if I may: How is the config generated when the node is > deploying

Re: [Bug 1401190] Re: curtin makes assumptions about partition names on all devices

On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Rob Sanderson <1401...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > Here you go > > /var/lib/cloud/instance/scripts/part-001 extract > > cd curtin > > cat configs/config-000.cfg > #cloud-config > … > ... > partitioni

Re: [Bug 1401190] Re: curtin makes assumptions about partition names on all devices

One more try, lets specify the partition "number" as 'p1' instead. - {device: nvme0n1, id: nvme0n1p1, name: nvme0n1p1, number: 'p1', offset: 4194304B, size: 128026935296B, type: partition, uuid: e66f2d9d-963a-4cb9-b2b5-472d491e768b, wipe: superblock} On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 1:24 PM, R

Re: [Bug 1401190] Re: curtin makes assumptions about partition names on all devices

OK; thanks. I need to work with nvme devices on Xenial; it looks like the storage naming rules for partitions are different for NVME devices (p1, p2, p3) versus other disks (1, 2, 3 4); On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Rob Sanderson <1401...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hi Ryan, &

Re: [Bug 1401190] Re: curtin makes assumptions about partition names on all devices

Yeah, looks like the mkfs code is expecting you to include label: 'some label' in the format dictionary. Can you try injecting a label into the format dictionary: - {fstype: ext4, id: nvme0n1-part1_format, label: 'SOME_LABEL_HERE', type: format, uuid: 6a47f95c-40b6-478a-aefa-ca84a509d877,

Re: [Bug 1401190] Re: curtin makes assumptions about partition names on all devices

On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Rob Sanderson <1401...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm still seeing this issue on Xenial. > > root@maas1:~# cat /etc/lsb-release > DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu > DISTRIB_RELEASE=16.04 > DISTRIB_CODENAME=xenial > DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development

[Bug 1551952] Re: FFE: Please merge multipath-tools 0.5.0+git1.656f8865 from Debian unstable

** Attachment added: "Changelog from 0.5.0 to version in Debian unstable; dropped "fix" entries and other non-features." https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1551952/+attachment/4585938/+files/Changelog-0.5.0..656f8865.txt -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1551952] [NEW] FFE: Please merge multipath-tools 0.5.0+git1.656f8865 from Debian unstable

Public bug reported: Upstream hasn't released a new version, but there are a large number of new features available in the version included in Debian unstable. This version from Debian has been confirmed to fix bug 1540407 The new version of the package will be tested with:   - MAAS driven

Re: [Bug 1540407] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

ng scenarios) on a 4.4.0-8 system with > > multipath-tools_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-4 and kpartx_0.5.0+git1.656f8865-4. > > Results should be available by tomorrow. > > Results show, that this combination does not harm, instead it solves the > subject problem, even after 100

Re: [Bug 1550437] Re: [BUG] Unable to install: dependency problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 07:56:59PM -, Michal Dziczkowski wrote: >I don't have the mantioned PPA in my repositories, so how could I >install slapd from it? The 'apt-cache policy' output you posted does include it. > 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/dirk-computer42/c42-backport/ubuntu/ trusts / >

[Bug 1550437] Re: [BUG] Unable to install: dependency problem

> Investigating (0) slapd [i386] 2.4.40-4 ~ ~ ubuntu14.04.1 c42.ppa1> (net) This package (slapd 2.4.40-4~ubuntu14.04.1~c42.ppa1) is not part of Ubuntu. It comes from one of the PPAs you have installed: https://launchpad.net/~dirk-computer42/+archive/ubuntu/c42-backport This is either a problem

[Bug 1550437] Re: [BUG] Unable to install: dependency problem

Hi Michal, Thanks for the report. Can I ask you to provide some more information? The output from the following commands would be very helpful: lsb_release -a uname -a apt-cache policy apt-get -y install slapd apt-get -y -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=1 install slapd ** Changed in: openldap

[Bug 1540407] Re: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device

Hi Thorsten, Thanks for the update. I'll attempt to find out if I can force a detach on the host-side to recreate the issue on x86 while I'm waiting for a Z system with FCP devices. Could you attempt to use the Debian package from Sid on top of the Ubuntu system? This will help rule out kernel

[Bug 1540407] Re: multipathd drops paths of a temporarily lost device

Hi Thorsten, The latest version of the multipath-tools package is 0.5.0-7ubuntu14. Can you confirm you're still seeing the issue? Meanwhile, I'm hoping to recreate this issue on zKVM shortly. In the meantime I'm testing this on in an x86 VM with multipath via virtio- scsi, using the same

[Bug 1545821] Re: Regression: spice usbredirect causes windows client to crash

Excellent -- However, ATM I'm away on business and I won't be able to try this until next week. I'll report my findings then. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545821

[Bug 1518440] Re: tgt fails to install in LXD

This fix has been released in Xenial, as tgt 1:1.0.62-1ubuntu2 ** Changed in: tgt (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: tgt (Ubuntu) Assignee: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (mathieu-tl) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1545821] Re: Regression: spice usbredirect causes windows client to crash

I'm certainly willing to try, but I cannot find the debian qemu binaries for version 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.21 (I only have 2.0.0+dfsg-2ubuntu1.19 cached locally). Are these packages mirrored somewhere? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

** Patch added: "debdiff netween debian 5.3.5-1 and ubuntu 5.3.5-1ubuntu1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1535951/+attachment/4573963/+files/debian-5.3.5-1-to-5.3.5-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

** Patch added: "Ubuntu debdiff between 5.1.2-0ubuntu8 and 5.3.5-1ubuntu1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1535951/+attachment/4573962/+files/ubuntu-5.1.2-0ubuntu8-to-5.3.5-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

I've pushed the latest revisions into the PPA: strongswan (5.3.5-1ubuntu7) xenial; urgency=medium * debian/{rules,control,libstrongswan-extra-plugins.install} Enable bliss plugin * debian/patches/increase-bliss-test-timeout.patch Under QEMU/KVM for autopkgtest bliss test takes a bit

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511735 Title: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets To manage

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

-tools lowpan-tools neard neard-tools ntrack-module-libnl-0 plainbox-provider-resource-generic sssd-common wpasupplicant ** Changed in: libnl3 (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: Ryan Harper (raharper) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Ser

Re: [Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:46 AM, mrq1 wrote: > it looks like strongswan is faking a nat situation if the kernel-libipsec > is used, so there are only problems with transport & beet mode .. > It sounds like it could be confusing. I'd prefer not to have a one-off for

Re: [Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:36 AM, mrq1 wrote: > looks good so far :-) > > i think the kernel-libipsec plugin should not be loaded by default > > the plugin works only with UDP encapsulated packets > > (look here:

[Bug 1545821] [NEW] Regression: spice usbredirect causes windows client to crash

Public bug reported: I have been using Ubuntu 14.04.3 as the host OS for a series of Windows based VM clients (Windows XP SP3 32-bit and Windows 10 Pro - 64bit) and using 'spice-client-gtk' to proxy a usb device (a webcam). Everything is fine if I use: hi qemu-keymaps

Re: [Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 2:12 AM, mrq1 wrote: > thanks for the fast pace! > > > should be ready in a bit with the new plugin > > NOPE. still no chapoly & ntru plugin included > chapoly and ntru are part of libstrongswan-extra-plugins > > # ipsec statusall > Status of

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Yes, quite close. I'll handle the FFE if needed but I feel on-track. I'm preparing the merge debdiff for review. Threads: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2016-January/039144.html https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2016-February/039201.html Please give the test-package

Re: [Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Ah, yes. I've a fix for that; I hadn't pushed my latest update in to the ppa. The extra-plugins package need some more privs for the charon binary in the apparmor profile. Look for 1ubuntu5 in the ppa in just a bit and see if that fixes up the issue with the extras plugins. On Sat, Feb 13,

Re: [Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:27 PM, mrq1 wrote: > great! starts now :-) > > what about the chapoly plugin? can you enable it in the extra package? > it would be very important for me! > I can look at enabling it. It's new in 5.3.5. If enabled, can you test and confirm

[Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #803787 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803787 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to strongswan in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535951 Title: Please

Re: [Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Simon Déziel <1535...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > On 2016-02-13 05:09 PM, Ryan Harper wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:27 PM, mrq1 <tempusfugit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> great! starts now :-) > >> >

Re: [Bug 1535951] Re: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Excellent! I had forgotten about that. I'll update. On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Simon Déziel <1535...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > On 2016-02-13 12:39 PM, Ryan Harper wrote: > > The extra-plugins package need some more privs for the charon binary > > in the appar

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

v3 debdiff - Removed unneeded spaces in debian/control Breaks entry - Fixed up libnl-3-200.symbols file to tag private symbols as optional (removes dpkg-gensymbols warning) - Removed invalid use of Closes() for Debian bugs; instead use LP: # ** Patch added: "lp_1511735_libnl3_v3.diff"

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

I've updated the debdiff to include a Breaks: network-manager (<< 0.9.8.8-0ubuntu7.3) to ensure that users are forced to use the newer network-manager (ie, this libnl won't install unless user has already updated their network-manager) Thanks Mathew for the suggestion. I've built and tested

[Bug 1539513] Re: networkmanager segfaults with 3.2.21-1ubuntu1

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1539634 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1539634 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1539634 network-manager crashes when using libnl-3-200-3.21.1-1ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

I've retagged this as verification-needed since we've had one regression (NetworkManager, a bug there) and we'd like to request other users of libnl to test out the version included in proposed so we can ensure we're flushing out other applications that may be exposed due to the behavior changed

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

This has not been released; this version is only available in trusty- proposed. It's not been verified at this point. ** Changed in: libnl3 (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 1518440] Re: tgt fails to install in LXD

Forwarded patch to upstream via: https://github.com/fujita/tgt/pull/17 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1518440 Title: tgt fails to install in LXD To manage

[Bug 1518440] Re: tgt fails to install in LXD

Updated debdiff: - Fix spelling of attempt - replace spaces with tabs in patch. ** Patch added: "tgt_fix_lp1518440_v3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tgt/+bug/1518440/+attachment/4560974/+files/tgt_fix_lp1518440_v3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1518440] Re: tgt fails to install in LXD

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #813368 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813368 ** Also affects: tgt (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813368 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you

[Blueprint servercloud-x-server-core] General server work for Xenial

Blueprint changed by Ryan Harper: Work items changed: Work items for ubuntu-15.11: [serge-hallyn] etckeeper: DONE [paelzer] NIS merge: DONE Work items for ubuntu-15.12: [raharper] : tgt merge (bug 1524982): DONE [racb] nagios-plugins/monitoring-plugins merge and cleanup: DONE

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

Thanks Nicolas. I'm working on fixing up NetworkManager; we'll need that fix as well to go out at the sametime. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511735 Title: libnl:

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

Hi Jakub, Thanks for testing the new package. It would be helpful to collect any core files and backtraces. apport-collect -p network-manager 1511735 Should collect the info for this bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

I've filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1539634 to track the updated needed there. I attached a debdeff in the NM bug after applying the patches from comment #24. I tested the updated NM with proposed libnl-3 and it works as expected. 1. Download 14.04.03

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1511735 Title: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets To manage

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

Looks like the changes in libnl exposed a bug in the N-M 0.98 code: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=8e4576b9fdb5c888d20a13aa2cc198df790dba54 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/commit/?id=65981edb9f562c07e78815c98093da67c50bfdcf -- You

[Bug 1539513] Re: networkmanager segfaults with 3.2.21-1ubuntu1

This bug is related to an attempted SRU for libnl here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnl3/+bug/1511735 The updated package exposes a bug in NetworkManager, which we're testing a fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1539634 -- You received this bug

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

Hi Nick, We've not built a new NetworkManager package with the fix. For now, you'll need to downgrade your libnl-3 packages: % apt-get install libnl-3-200=3.2.21-1 libnl-genl-3-200=3.2.21-1 libnl- route-3-200=3.2.21-1 And you may need to apply a hold until a fix for NetworkManager can be

[Bug 1511735] Re: libnl: fail to bind() netlink sockets

Nicolas, Thanks for the ping. I'm looking for a sponsor to review the update. If approved, then it'll get uploaded and continue through the SRU process. Thanks again for following up on this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1536301] Re: package libldap-2.4-2 2.4.41+dfsg-1ubuntu3 [modified: usr/share/doc/libldap-2.4-2/changelog.Debian.gz] failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/libldap-2

Sounds like a case of multi-arch skew. If I'm reading correctly, you had libldap-2.4-2 2.4.41+dfsg-1ubuntu2 installed for both i386 and amd64; but then you tried to upgrade to -1ubuntu3 on i386 only. Updating your system should resolve this, I think. ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1537762] Re: syncrepl does not work when using tls

Hi Ian, I found https://stathers.net/2016/01/14/thawte-premium-ssl- md5-gnutls.html but it would be surprising if that broke syncrepl but not ldapsearch. Still, worth checking if you haven't already. (ldapsearch and syncrepl are using the same CA certificate, right?) Is there any interesting

[Bug 1537762] Re: syncrepl does not work when using tls

Please also have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls26/+bug/1534230 (thanks to sarnold for the pointer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537762

[Bug 874339] Re: package slapd 2.4.23-6ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1040177 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040177 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1040177 slapd install fails when requesting to 'Omit OpenLDAP server configuration" -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 694707] Re: database doesn't get purged during purge

There is a debconf question about purge: Template: slapd/purge_database Type: boolean Default: false Description: Do you want the database to be removed when slapd is purged? Note that false is the default. Was it changed to true before purging? ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status:

[Blueprint servercloud-x-server-core] General server work for Xenial

Blueprint changed by Ryan Harper: Work items changed: Work items for ubuntu-15.11: [serge-hallyn] etckeeper: DONE [paelzer] NIS merge: DONE Work items for ubuntu-15.12: [raharper] : tgt merge (bug 1524982): DONE [racb] nagios-plugins/monitoring-plugins merge and cleanup: DONE

[Bug 1474030] Re: amulet _get_proc_start_time has a race which causes service restart checks to fail

n) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: neutron-openvswitch (Juju Charms Collection) Milestone: None => 16.01 ** Changed in: neutron-openvswitch (Juju Charms Collection) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1535951] [NEW] Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Public bug reported: Please merge strongswan 5.3.5-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) ** Affects: strongswan (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Ryan Harper (raharper) Status: New ** Changed in: strongswan (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Harper (rahar

[Bug 1518440] Re: tgt fails to install in LXD

No; it should go upstream AFAICT. I can regen with tabs; my fault for not checking what the source file used. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1518440 Title: tgt

[Bug 1474030] Re: amulet _get_proc_start_time has a race which causes service restart checks to fail

) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: neutron-openvswitch (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) ** Changed in: heat (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Beisner (1chb1n) ** Changed in: glance (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rya

[Bug 1533639] Re: [ubuntu-cpc] please make /tmp a tmpfs in RAM

Can we publish some test images? Instead of guessing at this, we can benchmark this. In general swapping ram-based for what is almost always disk-based is going to impact applications/deployments using tmp and expecting enough space there. It's not uncommon for large ISO or other image

[Bug 1532571] Re: kvm crashes host kernel on trusty+hwe-w (unable to handle kernel paging request in __mtrr_lookup_var_next)

https://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2015/10/msg00332.html common threads 4.2 kernel and UEFI mode of kvm. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1532571 Title: kvm crashes

[Bug 1532648] [NEW] Please merge openldap 2.4.42+dfsg-2 (main) from Debian testing (main)

Public bug reported: Please merge openldap 2.4.42+dfsg-2 (main) from Debian testing (main) ** Affects: openldap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Ryan Tandy (rtandy) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Tandy (rta

[Bug 1532648] proposed merged package

/openldap_2.4.42+dfsg-2ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ryan Tandy (rtandy) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Blueprint servercloud-x-server-core] General server work for Xenial

Blueprint changed by Ryan Harper: Work items changed: Work items for ubuntu-15.11: [serge-hallyn] etckeeper: TODO [paelzer] NIS merge: DONE Work items for ubuntu-15.12: - [raharper] : tgt merge (bug 1524982): INPROGRESS + [raharper] : tgt merge (bug 1524982): DONE [racb] nagios

[Bug 990751] Re: package slapd 2.4.28-1.1ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 112631 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112631 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 112631 slapd failed to install/upgrade: database (dc=xxx,dc=xxx,dc=xx) not configured to hold "dc=nodomain" -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 862520] Re: package slapd 2.4.23-6ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

caused by: Preparing to replace slapd 2.4.21-0ubuntu5.5 (using .../slapd_2.4.23-6ubuntu6_amd64.deb) ... Dumping to /var/backups/slapd-2.4.21-0ubuntu5.5: Unpacking replacement slapd ... Would need a copy of the config before the upgrade in order to determine why the database was not listed for

[Bug 840513] Re: package slapd 2.4.23-6ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 862520 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862520 >From the upgrade log: Setting up slapd (2.4.23-6ubuntu6) ... Backing up /etc/ldap/slapd.d in /var/backups/slapd-2.4.21-0ubuntu5.4... done. Moving old database directories to /var/backups: Loading from

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >