[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common

2009-10-26 Thread Sam Illingworth
Well, I suppose it's good that it's not affecting other people, but I've
never manually edited my sources file, and I've disabled every optional
repo so I'm only looking at the standard Ubuntu ones, so this would
still seem to be an Ubuntu bug.  Hmm.  Well, I'm planning on doing a
fresh install when Karmic is out, so I imagine this will be resolved in
three days!  Well, not resolved, but it won't effect me any more, and
since nobody else has subscribed I don't suppose it matters.  I don't
like just giving up though, something must have gone wrong and without
having found out what we've no reason to assume that that bug isn't
still in there somewhere, waiting, watching, slowly and surely drawing
its plans against us...

-- 
samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common

2009-10-19 Thread Sam Illingworth
Attached

** Attachment added: sources.list
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33957627/sources.list

-- 
samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common

2009-10-07 Thread Sam Illingworth
OK, I've tried that, can still replicate.

Here's a screenshot showing the samba packages sorted by latest version;
you're right - some are 3, some 3.1.

Funny thing is, if I go to Force Version on samba-common it lists the
two options as

2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3.1 (now)
2:3.3.2-1ubuntu3 (Jaunty)

But I'm using Jaunty - why isn't the Jaunty version the one I have?  If
I select the Jaunty version it wants to remove smbclient, ubuntu-desktop
and winbind.

** Attachment added: Screenshot.png
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33211659/Screenshot.png

-- 
samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 444926] Re: samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common

2009-10-07 Thread Sam Illingworth
Do you mean the Download from option on the first tab of Software
Sources?  I tried changing that a couple of times, no difference.

Can anyone replicate this?  What's showing up under latest version for
the various samba packages for you guys?

-- 
samba and smbfs depend on an old version of samba-common
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444926
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs