[Bug 1226855] Re: Cannot use open-iscsi inside LXC container
This is a blocking issue for users of iscsi-based storage HW on Openstack; is there any way of re-prioritizing this issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1226855 Title: Cannot use open-iscsi inside LXC container To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1226855/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1336364] Re: network.filters should be included when installing nova-compute
** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336364 Title: network.filters should be included when installing nova-compute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron/+bug/1336364/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1336364] Re: network.filters should be included when installing nova-compute
One Example: # nova/virt/libvirt/vif.py: 'ebrctl', ... ebrctl: CommandFilter, ebrctl, root -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336364 Title: network.filters should be included when installing nova-compute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron/+bug/1336364/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1024475] Re: libnss-ldap causes boot hang on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise
Yep, sad to say this is still happening, 2 years later. Brand new install of 14.04 LTS goes into high cpu usage during boot and you never make it to a usable login prompt with LDAP enabled. Tried setting the LDAP URI to localhost, LAN IP and it's FQDN, no effect. Luckily, the workaround posted in #2 worked for me and I'm up and running... at least until the script is replaced in a future update. Kludgy perhaps, but better than nothing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1024475 Title: libnss-ldap causes boot hang on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/1024475/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1336364] [NEW] network.filters should be included when installing nova-compute
Public bug reported: /etc/nova/rootwrap.d/network.filters is need by VIF drivers. It should be installed when installing nova-compute. ** Affects: neutron (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to neutron in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336364 Title: network.filters should be included when installing nova-compute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron/+bug/1336364/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1319817] Re: dovecot 2.2.9-1ubuntu2 misses init script to start
The same for 2.2.9-1ubuntu2.1 ** Project changed: dovecot = dovecot (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319817 Title: dovecot 2.2.9-1ubuntu2 misses init script to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1319817/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1319817] Re: dovecot 2.2.9-1ubuntu2 misses init script to start
Old dovecot 1 init.d script is working well.
It's this one:
#! /bin/sh
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: dovecot
# Required-Start:$local_fs $remote_fs $network $syslog $time
# Required-Stop: $local_fs $remote_fs $network $syslog
# Should-Start: postgresql mysql slapd winbind
# Should-Stop: postgresql mysql slapd winbind
# Default-Start: 2 3 4 5
# Default-Stop: 0 1 6
# Short-Description: Dovecot init script
# Description: Init script for dovecot services
### END INIT INFO
# Author: Miquel van Smoorenburg miqu...@cistron.nl.
# Modified for Debian GNU/Linux
# by Ian Murdock imurd...@gnu.ai.mit.edu.
#
# Do NOT set -e
# PATH should only include /usr/* if it runs after the mountnfs.sh script
PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin
DESC=IMAP/POP3 mail server
NAME=dovecot
DAEMON=/usr/sbin/dovecot
DAEMON_ARGS=
SCRIPTNAME=/etc/init.d/$NAME
CONF=/etc/dovecot/${NAME}.conf
# Read configuration variable file if it is present
[ -r /etc/default/$NAME ] . /etc/default/$NAME
# Exit if the package is not installed
[ -x $DAEMON ] || exit 0
# Exit if the configuration file doesn't exist
[ -f $CONF ] || exit 0
# Exit if explicitly told to
[ $ENABLED != 0 ] || exit 0
# Allow core dumps if requested
[ $ALLOW_COREDUMPS != 1 ] || ulimit -c unlimited
# Define LSB log_* functions.
# Depend on lsb-base (= 3.0-6) to ensure that this file is present.
. /lib/lsb/init-functions
# conf file readable?
if [ ! -r ${CONF} ]; then
log_daemon_msg ${CONF}: not readable $NAME log_end_msg 1;
exit 1;
fi
# dont check for inetd.conf if its not installed
if [ -f /etc/inetd.conf ]; then
# The init script should do nothing if dovecot or another imap/pop3 server
# is being run from inetd, and dovecot is configured to run as an imap or
# pop3 service
for p in `sed -r s/^ *(([^:]+|\[[^]]+]|\*):)?(pop3s?|imaps?)[ \t].*/\3/;t;d
\
/etc/inetd.conf`
do
for q in `sed -r s/^[ \t]*protocols[ \t]*=[
\t]*(([^\]*)|\(.*)\)/\2\3/;t;d \
${CONF}`
do
if [ $p = $q ]; then
exit 0
fi
done
done
fi
# determine the location of the PID file
# overide by setting base_dir in conf file or PIDBASE in /etc/defaults/$NAME
PIDBASE=${PIDBASE:-`sed -r s/^[ \t]*base_dir[ \t]*=[ \t]*([^ \t]*)/\1/;t;d
${CONF}`}
PIDFILE=${PIDBASE:-/var/run/dovecot}/master.pid
#
# Function that starts the daemon/service
#
do_start()
{
# Return
# 0 if daemon has been started
# 1 if daemon was already running
# 2 if daemon could not be started
start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON --test
-- -c ${CONF} /dev/null \
|| return 1
start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --exec $DAEMON -- -c
${CONF} \
$DAEMON_ARGS \
|| return 2
}
#
# Function that stops the daemon/service
#
do_stop()
{
# Return
# 0 if daemon has been stopped
# 1 if daemon was already stopped
# 2 if daemon could not be stopped
# other if a failure occurred
start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --retry=TERM/30/KILL/5 --pidfile $PIDFILE
--name ${DAEMON##*/}
RETVAL=$?
[ $RETVAL = 2 ] return 2
# Wait for children to finish too if this is a daemon that forks
# and if the daemon is only ever run from this initscript.
# If the above conditions are not satisfied then add some other code
# that waits for the process to drop all resources that could be
# needed by services started subsequently. A last resort is to
# sleep for some time.
start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo --retry=0/30/KILL/5 --pidfile
$PIDFILE --name ${DAEMON##*/}
[ $? = 2 ] return 2
# Many daemons don't delete their pidfiles when they exit.
rm -f $PIDFILE
return $RETVAL
}
#
# Function that sends a SIGHUP to the daemon/service
#
do_reload() {
#
# If the daemon can reload its configuration without
# restarting (for example, when it is sent a SIGHUP),
# then implement that here.
#
start-stop-daemon --stop --signal HUP --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE --name
$NAME
return 0
}
case $1 in
start)
log_daemon_msg Starting $DESC $NAME
# Dovecot will kill itself if the system clock moves backwards
# while Dovecot is running, and this can happen if the hardware
# clock is severely out of sync at boot time, and then ntpd is
# used to synchronize the system clock. So, if the machine also
# runs ntpd, we call ntp-wait to make sure that ntpd has had a
# chance to synchronize the system clock before Dovecot is
# started.
test -x /usr/sbin/ntp-wait ntp-wait -n 2 || true
do_start
case $? in
0|1) log_end_msg 0 ;;
2) log_end_msg 1 ;;
esac
;;
stop)
log_daemon_msg Stopping $DESC $NAME
do_stop
case $? in
0|1) log_end_msg 0 ;;
2) log_end_msg 1 ;;
esac
;;
reload|force-reload)
log_daemon_msg Reloading $DESC $NAME
do_reload
[Bug 1319817] Re: dovecot 2.2.9-1ubuntu2 misses init script to start
You're perfectly right. For whatever reason, autocompletion for dovecot upstart isn't working. So I overlooked it. Thanks for your hint. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319817 Title: dovecot 2.2.9-1ubuntu2 misses init script to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1319817/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1214379] Re: pinger crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc_consolidate()
Having same problem with squid3 3.3.8-1ubuntu6, running Ubuntu 14.04 within a VirtualBox Vm. Any solution yet? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214379 Title: pinger crashed with SIGSEGV in malloc_consolidate() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid3/+bug/1214379/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1304613] Re: nodes can't get out to the internet beyond the maas server by default
To add to this, as I also am experiencing this problem: My maas has 2 nics and 2 networks: Outbound eth1: talks to the world (or in thsi case my partner OEM's lab network Private eth0: talks only to maas-create nodes. Call it 10.0.0.0/24 . I've set up maas as DHCP DNS manager for eth0. I have *not* NATed eth0 as the Partner OEM does not like private NATs on its lab network. My /etc/resolv.conf, /etc/maas/dhcp.conf and /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf are saying the right things. When I create node1 (using fastpath install) I can ping other things on the 10.0.0.0/24 network (by name or address) but cannot ping google.com (even though the name resolves correctly). If I turn on NAT this works. This makes post-node-startup installation and configuration very problematic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304613 Title: nodes can't get out to the internet beyond the maas server by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1304613/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1304613] Re: nodes can't get out to the internet beyond the maas server by default
Actually, my last comment encompasses a different problem (that of isolation), so ignore it. But do count this as a vote to some kind of NAT on/off tooling in MAAS. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1304613 Title: nodes can't get out to the internet beyond the maas server by default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1304613/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1302741] Re: dpkg-reconfigure maas-region-controller fails
I have not seen any reportable breakage; admittedly I have not fully stressed maas nor used all of its functions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302741 Title: dpkg-reconfigure maas-region-controller fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1302741/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1300026] Re: Enlistment/commissioning boot no longer works
ignore last comment. A fresh import works.until you reboot. Even if you changed nothing else in the configuration of the server or maas, enlistment will no longer work until you do another maas-import-pxe-files at which time things will work again. ** Tags added: blocks-hwcert-server ** Changed in: maas Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300026 Title: Enlistment/commissioning boot no longer works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1300026/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1300026] Re: Enlistment/commissioning boot no longer works
A fresh import works.until you reboot. Even if you changed nothing else in the configuration of the server or maas, enlistment will no longer work until you reboot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300026 Title: Enlistment/commissioning boot no longer works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1300026/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1294332] Re: MAAS fails to manage power for system with Intel Integrated BMC
I saw similar issues at IBM on 10 March. Same look to the logs, same success with ipmitool. After an apt-get upgrade on the 11th (trusty) and a reboot, the issues did not appear for me. I did not refresh after the 11th, though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1294332 Title: MAAS fails to manage power for system with Intel Integrated BMC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1294332/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1284144] Re: Wrong log file path in Mellanox Neutron Agent init script
** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to neutron in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1284144 Title: Wrong log file path in Mellanox Neutron Agent init script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron/+bug/1284144/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 708493] Re: Can't login anymore: Read from socket failed: Connection reset by peer
Howdy, I know that in my case, this was definitely an MTU problem, and it exhibits exactly the behavior stated above. to test this, call ping -M do -s 1500 host If it goes through, this is probably not your issue. If it does not, try lowering the -s value until it does go through. If the value that you find is lower than the MTU on your interface, this is likely the problem. The solution would be to change your MTU size on the interface. You can check this with ifconfig and set it with sudo ifconfig interface mtu 1000 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708493 Title: Can't login anymore: Read from socket failed: Connection reset by peer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/708493/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
Re #88: Yes, it was working with 3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3 and stopped working with 3.6.3-2ubuntu2.4. However, the problem has changed. Before the fix on any version, the shared printer was not visible to the workgroup, but now they are. And now, when printing from a windows client, I'm getting the following specific error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED opening remote spool Test Page. I see others complaining of this new (to me) symptom and so I will follow those bug reports and assume this bug report has been fixed for me even though I still can't print from a windows client. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
What happened to the fix? On 2013-03-09 23:20:24 /var/log/apt/history.log shows samba:i386 (3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3) being installed, and I could once again access printer shares from windows. However, this morning, I could not! The history.log shows 2013-03-23 23:27:26 samba:i386 (3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3, 3.6.3-2ubuntu2.4). I wanted to downgrade to samba:i386 (3.6.3-2ubuntu2.3) but could not. apt-cache showpkg samba shows: Provides: 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.4 - 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 - 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2 - Do we open a new bug report or continue with this one? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1080912] [NEW] package qemu-kvm 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Error occurred during standard sudo apt-get upgrade action ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: qemu-kvm 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-32.51-generic-pae 3.2.30 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-32-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu15 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Nov 19 21:30:54 2012 DuplicateSignature: Setting up qemu-kvm (1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/init/qemu-kvm.conf ... udevadm trigger is not permitted while udev is unconfigured. dpkg: error processing qemu-kvm (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111011) KvmCmdLine: Error: command ['ps', '-C', 'kvm', '-F'] failed with exit code 1: UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP Pavilion dv6000 (RP283UA#ABA) MarkForUpload: True ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-32-generic-pae root=UUID=7e50890a-964b-49c5-a629-5d03c1ef9cd4 ro SourcePackage: qemu-kvm Title: package qemu-kvm 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-02 (201 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 03/22/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard dmi.bios.version: F.2E dmi.board.name: 30BB dmi.board.vendor: Quanta dmi.board.version: 66.42 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Quanta dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvrF.2E:bd03/22/2010:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPPaviliondv6000(RP283UA#ABA):pvrRev1:rvnQuanta:rn30BB:rvr66.42:cvnQuanta:ct10:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: HP Pavilion dv6000 (RP283UA#ABA) dmi.product.version: Rev 1 dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard ** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 package-from-proposed precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080912 Title: package qemu-kvm 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu14.4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/1080912/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
Since the last samba updates to precise the two workarounds (installing 3.5.6 deb package or using samba 4RC1 from the software centre) that I mentioned above are no longer effective; 356 will not install, and 4RC1 will not start. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
I have also found that installing samba 4rc1 from the Ubuntu software centre has no problem with print and file sharing even though it does give errors during the installation. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
Hello James, Pretty much, just a few minor changes that I've been using for the last 10 years. Merlin is the printer and I'm using the standard printer configuration: [printers] comment = All Printers browseable = yes path = /var/spool/samba printable = yes guest ok = yes ; read only = yes create mask = 0700 As for the changes, carried over from my Fedora days, I think these are the only ones: workgroup = MyGroup wins support = yes domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 65 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
Well, I needed this to work now. Ubuntu software centre removed samba, installed the deb 3.5.6 package, everthing works great. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
Set log level = 10, erased the logs, rebooted samba server and client, tried to access both file and print shares. File share access successful. Print share access unsuccessful. Attaching logs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
** Attachment added: log.smbd https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+attachment/3298368/+files/log.smbd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
** Attachment added: client log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+attachment/3298377/+files/log.win95 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
I too was running a windows client accessing both file and print shares from samba running under 10.04. Upgraded to 12.04. The client can see and use the file shares but now the print shares. I have set log level = 3. Here's the output from ntp: crlb@chimpanzee:~$ net rpc rights list -S 192.168.1.11 crlb Enter crlb's password: crlb@chimpanzee:~$ I'll attach the logs shortly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
That should have read but not the print shares. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
** Attachment added: server log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+attachment/3294278/+files/log.192.168.1.11 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
** Attachment added: client log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+attachment/3294279/+files/log.win95 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
#21 worked for me too, but really needs a better explanation. rpcclient needs to be run as superuser - it did not work for me until I changed user to root (su root) i did not try it, but I think sudo rpcclient should work as well if you have enabled root directly. typing enumprinters 5 resulted in one listing for each of the printers in my system, but the result for each priner was printername:[\\LOCALHOST\] portname:[] attributes:[0x0] device_not_selected_timeout:[0x0] transmission_retry_timeout:[0x0] enumprinters (without the 5) yielded this with the correct name for each printer: flags:[0x80] name:[\\LOCALHOST\HP-LaserJet-1100] description:[\\LOCALHOST\HP-LaserJet-1100,,HP LaserJet 1100] comment:[HP LaserJet 1100] typing setprintername HP-LaserJet-1100 HP-LaserJet-1100 resulte din a success message. typing enumprinters 5 now lists the printer with the correct name. and I can connect normally from the Windows clients. I do not know what the 5 means, but apparantly the upgrade did something to zero out the existing settings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 967410] Re: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers
I am rather new to Ubuntu. Is it possible to uninstall this version of SAMBA and revert back to an earlier version (Which worked fine) until this bug is fixed? I did the same thing, upgrade from 11.10 to 12.04 and now I cannot use my Linux shared printers on my network. (PCs are using both Vista and XP OS). My configuration and applications are basicly what came with the original Ubuntu install download. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/967410 Title: Windows clients cannot connect to shared printers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/967410/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1006829] [NEW] package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Notification of crash was displayed in Gnome environment. I installed samba4 from the CLI, purge samba4, and then installed samba. I though all went well, I locked the screen, left for the night and was presented with notification when the screen was unlocked the next morning. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.39-generic 3.2.16 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 AptOrdering: samba: Install samba: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed May 30 14:13:58 2012 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120425) SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006829 Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1006829/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1006829] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006829 Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1006829/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1006829] Re: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
testparm output... sudo testparm Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf rlimit_max: increasing rlimit_max (1024) to minimum Windows limit (16384) WARNING: The idmap uid option is deprecated WARNING: The idmap gid option is deprecated Processing section [homes] Processing section [printers] Loaded services file OK. 'winbind separator = +' might cause problems with group membership. Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_MEMBER Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions [global] workgroup = FREEDOMFORUM realm = FREEDOMFORUM.ORG server string = WS2914 Ubuntu 12.04 Workstation security = ADS log file = /var/log/samba/%m max log size = 50 printcap name = cups template shell = /bin/bash winbind separator = + winbind enum users = Yes winbind enum groups = Yes winbind use default domain = Yes idmap config * : range = 1500-2 idmap config * : backend = tdb strict allocate = Yes [homes] comment = Home Direcotries valid users = %S read only = No browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/cups guest ok = Yes printable = Yes print ok = Yes browseable = No -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006829 Title: package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1006829/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 869684] Re: 530 login incorrect error after upgrade to Oneiric
Just wanted to report back that I was able to solve my issue by: apt-get remove vsftpd rm /etc/pam.d/vsftpd (figuring it will recreate it) apt-get install vsftpd Now it works fine. The /etc/pam.d/vsftpd was NOT recreated. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869684 Title: 530 login incorrect error after upgrade to Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/869684/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 869684] Re: 530 login incorrect error after upgrade to Oneiric
I would like to throw my hat in the ring. I have the same issue after upgrading to Oneiric.Is there a work around for this? I tried symlinking the pam_shells.so file but it then fails with a memory allocation error. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869684 Title: 530 login incorrect error after upgrade to Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/+bug/869684/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 609625] Re: kexec-tools 0_kdump
I'd certainly be willing to resolve this issue and provide patches to do so if I knew that someone with developer access had the ability to actually verify they are reasonable patches. I'd hate to provide a fix for this to a bot. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609625 Title: kexec-tools 0_kdump -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 609625] Re: kexec-tools 0_kdump
I agree I think its important to have for server and clustered environments. I'd like to see this fixed and I've done some of the fixing and gave patches. However, seems no one on the Ubuntu side thinks its that important I guess. Thanks, - David Brown On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Dominik 609...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: Is there a chance to escalate this? On productional server systems the need for an automatic kernel crash dump is IMO a must have. Enterprise grade Linux distributions like SLES and RHEL have this ready and working. What about the LTS Ubuntu-Server system? Isn't this targeted for enterprise? -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609625 Title: kexec-tools 0_kdump To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/609625/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609625 Title: kexec-tools 0_kdump -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 726034] [NEW] package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: squid N/A ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic 2.6.32.27+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Feb 27 09:11:22 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: squid Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: squid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726034 Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 726034] Re: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/726034 Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 713204] Re: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Andreas FYI - after mucking about for days in an effort to get the backuppc user with the right permissions and a known password (using htpasswd), I eventually did a *complete* removal of the backuppc package in Synaptic; then deleted the backuppc user; then reinstalled. This time it went in just fine, giving the dialogue box about the creation of the backuppc user and password. So, although I do not recall having previously put a copy of backuppc on my machine and then deleting it without having ever used it, it looks as though that *is* the likely source of the problem. The only difference between this reinstall and the previous one was that this time I deleted the backuppc user (as hinted at in your email). So, problem solved. Thanks, John On 5 February 2011 21:24, Andreas Olsson andr...@arrakis.se wrote: Never mind that about the duplicate. While there are similarities to comments later on, your issue isn't the same as the original issue reported in that bug report. Looking closer at your term log I see that there are no mention of any backuppc user being created? Have you had backuppc installed before on that system? -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713204 Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “backuppc” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: backuppc I was using Ubuntu Software Centre to install BackupPC, but the script failed. I suspect it was because although I'd installed Apache, I had not yet set up Apache2 config files - I've been using lighttpd instead. So when the script tried to restart the web server it failed. Maybe a bit more clarity about the dependencies on the Info page would be useful. I'll try to get Apache2 working properly and then do a re- install from Ubuntu Software Centre. John ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic 2.6.32.27+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Feb 4 16:32:12 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: backuppc Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/713204/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713204 Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 713204] Re: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Andreas No, I haven't had BackupPC successfully installed before and indeed no User has been set up. You will recall, though, that I have removed and reinstalled from Ubuntu Software Centre to see if changing the permissions on the directories would now allow thte links to be made and the install to go in cleanly. Well, I got as far as the invitation to log in as user backuppc, but had no password and couldn't enter the web interface. After reading the config files and tinkering for a bit I came across instructions for how to change the password using htpasswd, but this hasn't completely solved the issue because although I now have a known password associated with the backuppc user, there is in fact no backuppc user to associate the password with! I guess it's the case that the install script had only got so far when it fell over. When I then removed and reinstalled from Ubuntu Software Centre things were probably in an ambiguous state. Of course, you may detect something different. Would it help if I sent you any further config or log files? If so, do say. -- Just to get a better handle on how a normal install ought to have gone, I moved to the small Debian Lenny partition on my hard drive (host name keizan) and installed BackupPC there using the command: keizan:/# aptitude install backuppc rsync libfile-rsync-perl libfile-rsyncp-perl par2 bzip2 as suggested on DebianHelp. [I did it there so as not to disturb the set up on my main Ubuntu partition for diagnostic purposes]. You can tell from the attached record of the terminal session that everything went in OK and I am able to log in because the backuppc user was set up as expected. From my own point of view, as I only wanted to explore the software, this is enough for me. Equally, I could maybe strip out my Ubuntu BackupPC install and use apt-get there to achieve the same result. But I'm aware that having got yout teeth into this apparent bug you may well feel the need to resolve it. In which case, I am at your disposal to the limits of my capabilities. I have 'played' with Linux since Red Hat 5.1 and am comfortable enough with the command line. However, I am no expert on enterprise system adminstration so I will benefit from fairly explicit guidance/instructions. Again, thanks for pursuing this. Let me know how you want to play it. Regards, John On 5 February 2011 21:24, Andreas Olsson andr...@arrakis.se wrote: Never mind that about the duplicate. While there are similarities to comments later on, your issue isn't the same as the original issue reported in that bug report. Looking closer at your term log I see that there are no mention of any backuppc user being created? Have you had backuppc installed before on that system? -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713204 Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “backuppc” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: backuppc I was using Ubuntu Software Centre to install BackupPC, but the script failed. I suspect it was because although I'd installed Apache, I had not yet set up Apache2 config files - I've been using lighttpd instead. So when the script tried to restart the web server it failed. Maybe a bit more clarity about the dependencies on the Info page would be useful. I'll try to get Apache2 working properly and then do a re- install from Ubuntu Software Centre. John ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic 2.6.32.27+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Feb 4 16:32:12 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: backuppc Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/713204/+subscribe ** Attachment added: debianInstallSession.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713204/+attachment/1835711/+files/debianInstallSession.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713204 Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 713204] Re: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Andreas Many thanks for pointing me back to the detail of the error report itself. I've run the checks it suggests (df. df -i, etc) and include for your information a copy of the output of the terminal session showing (as far as I can tell) that there was no essential problem beyond the fact that the directory *cpool* had not been created. I created this directory. I then disabled all other web servers and got Apache2 running OK. Anyway, I then tried to reinstall BackupPC from Ubuntu Software Centre but the exact same thing occurred - same error Unable to make hard link... etc. I thought it could just be a permissions problem, so for simplicity speed I changed directory to /var/lib/backuppc and did a quick: *root@jb:/var/lib/backuppc#*chmod 777 pc cpool After doing this, I *was* able to start the program with: *root@jb:/var/lib/backuppc#* /etc/init.d/backuppc start and check into it with the web interface well, now, of course, I need to re-read the documentation to find out how to locate the password to let me in! Either that or reinstall the software and hope that with a successful install the password will be shown on-screen... Ah well, at least with your help I seem to have detected the main problem... permissions. I've also had a look at the other bug report you pointed to and I conclude that I have achieved the same outcome by a different method (i.e. I made the directories everyone's rather than root's or the usual user's). My approach is a bit of a blunt instrument and absolutely _not_ recommended for production use! But it's fine for testing purposes. Of course, the recent Linux Format magazine article [Issue LXF142 March 2011, page 43] *did* suggest that BackupPC's configuration is not for the faint-hearted :-). I only thought about using this program because it would allow me to back up my laptop to a NAS drive; many backup programs assume you want to backup to a physically-connected USB hard drive. So I may be as well-off in the long run sticking with Backup-Manager - or even using mc instead. Equally, it's no sweat to use a variant of ftp (eg ncftp does things quite nicely) to do the job. It's just I can never resist the chance to explore another bit of excellent free software :-) Thanks again for your interest and advice. John On 5 February 2011 15:42, Andreas Olsson andr...@arrakis.se wrote: Yes, you do seem to have a conflict between apache and lighttpd, yet that isn't what causes the installation of backuppc to fail. Here we have the relevant error message * Starting backuppc... 2011-02-04 16:32:11 Can't create a test hardlink between a file in /var/lib/backuppc/pc and /var/lib/backuppc/cpool. Either these are different file systems, or this file system doesn't support hardlinks, or these directories don't exist, or there is a permissions problem, or the file system is out of inodes or full. Use df, df -i, and ls -ld to check each of these possibilities. Quitting... invoke-rc.d: initscript backuppc, action start failed. dpkg: error processing backuppc (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 See also bug #445154. -- You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713204 Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Status in “backuppc” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Binary package hint: backuppc I was using Ubuntu Software Centre to install BackupPC, but the script failed. I suspect it was because although I'd installed Apache, I had not yet set up Apache2 config files - I've been using lighttpd instead. So when the script tried to restart the web server it failed. Maybe a bit more clarity about the dependencies on the Info page would be useful. I'll try to get Apache2 working properly and then do a re- install from Ubuntu Software Centre. John ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic 2.6.32.27+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Feb 4 16:32:12 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: backuppc Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/713204/+subscribe ** Attachment added: terminal_session.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713204/+attachment/1832648/+files/terminal_session.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,
[Bug 713204] [NEW] package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: backuppc I was using Ubuntu Software Centre to install BackupPC, but the script failed. I suspect it was because although I'd installed Apache, I had not yet set up Apache2 config files - I've been using lighttpd instead. So when the script tried to restart the web server it failed. Maybe a bit more clarity about the dependencies on the Info page would be useful. I'll try to get Apache2 working properly and then do a re- install from Ubuntu Software Centre. John ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic 2.6.32.27+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Feb 4 16:32:12 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: backuppc Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: backuppc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713204 Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 713204] Re: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to backuppc in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713204 Title: package backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 710672] Re: package mysql-client-5.1 5.1.49-1ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/my_print_defaults', which is also in package mysql-server-core-5.1 5.1.49-1ubuntu9
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 710505 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710505 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 710505 package mysql-client-5.1 5.1.49-1ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/my_print_defaults.1.gz', which is also in package mysql-server-core-5.1 5.1.49-1ubuntu9 * You can subscribe to bug 710505 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-5.1/+bug/710505/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-5.1 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/710672 Title: package mysql-client-5.1 5.1.49-1ubuntu9 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/my_print_defaults', which is also in package mysql-server-core-5.1 5.1.49-1ubuntu9 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 564796] Re: The --print options in the logwatch man page examples don't work
Here's the output requested. $ logwatch --service ftpd-xferlog --range all --detail high --print --archives Unknown option: print $ logwatch --service pam_pwdb --range yesterday --detail high --print Unknown option: print In each case, logwatch also prints a Usage message (same as logwatch --help) And in case it helps ... $ logwatch --version Logwatch 7.3.6 (released 05/19/07) I think the problem is simply that the examples in the man page use an option that doesn't exist any more. -- The --print options in the logwatch man page examples don't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/564796 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to logwatch in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 452185] Re: can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance
I'm having the same issue and I'm at a bit of a loss. My Eucalyptus 1.6.2 installation using Xen 3.4.3 on Fedora Core 12 64-bit is suffering the identical fate. The challenge is this is a single 'all in one' system with STATIC vnet mode. My cloud host IP is the same address as the Walrus host, Cluster Controller, and Storage Controller. With an all-in-one device where there really is no 'public' IP how would I go about resolving this? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. -- can't access SC volumes in a UEC instance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452185 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 499129] [NEW] package samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba stopped in the middle of synaptic install ProblemType: Package AptOrdering: samba: Purge Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Dec 21 10:39:40 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic i686 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 499129] Re: package samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37022847/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37022850/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37022852/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499129 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 499128] [NEW] package samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba stopped in the middle of synaptic install ProblemType: Package AptOrdering: samba: Purge Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Dec 21 10:39:40 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-16.53-generic SourcePackage: samba Title: package samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.31-16-generic i686 ** Affects: samba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 -- package samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499128 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 499128] Re: package samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37022843/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37022844/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37022845/DpkgTerminalLog.txt -- package samba 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/499128 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 461195] [NEW] Allow mysql versions 5.0 and 5.1 to be installed at the same time
Public bug reported: This follows on from bug 418342. Currently, it is impossible to use MySQL 5.0 when running kde in Karmic. This is because akonadi-server requires mysql-server-core-5.1, which conflicts with mysql-server-core-5.0 (and subsequently mysql- server-5.1). As advised from bug 418342, simply allowing akonadi-server to depend on mysql-server-core does not work, as binaries linked to the 5.1 libraries do not work when the 5.0 libraries are installed. The only recommended solution is to allow both to be installed at the same time. In addition, this would seem to be a desirable goal anyway. For example, it would be entirely reasonable for a developer to want to test against both versions of the server locally. But the akonadi/mysql-5.0 conflict will I suspect be something of a showstopper for many developers. ** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Allow mysql versions 5.0 and 5.1 to be installed at the same time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461195 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 460294] [NEW] package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 $ apt-cache policy kvm kvm: Installed: (none) Candidate: 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.3 Version table: 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu12.3 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:84+dfsg-0ubuntu11 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages $ apt-cache policy libvirt-bin libvirt-bin: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 Version table: 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 0.6.1-0ubuntu5 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages I was installing KVM (libvirt) as vmware is getting worse. libver failed to install during the dpkg-update part of the install. I think it was probably due to Vmware server being installed on the same machine already. I gave up and played a game where I could KILL stuff instead :) ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ErrorMessage: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 SourcePackage: libvirt Title: package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Uname: Linux 2.6.28-15-generic x86_64 ** Affects: libvirt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package -- package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 460294] Re: package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34351576/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34351577/DpkgTerminalLog.gz -- package libvirt-bin 0.6.1-0ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460294 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 418342] Re: akonadi-server prevents install of mysql-server-5.0
I'm starting to get a little concerned by this, with Karmic being released in the next week. Unless I'm completely misreading the package dependencies (and I'm by no means an expert on the subject), anyone installing KDE on Karmic will be prevented from also installing mysql- server 5.0. This will be a *huge* problem for people who need to develop against 5.0. The way I see it, akonadi-server currently depends on: mysql-server-core-5.1 Would fixing this not simply be a case of making it instead depend on: mysql-server-core Which would presumably allow either 5.0 or 5.1 to be installed as required by the user? -- akonadi-server prevents install of mysql-server-5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 392521] Re: Segmentation fault when using php -l to validate any PHP script
I just tried this on a completely up to date karmic machine: $ while true; do php -r ; done Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segfaults continue to appear every few seconds. -- Segmentation fault when using php -l to validate any PHP script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392521 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 343870] Re: php-cli segmentation fault with mysql extension
Sent here from bug 392521. I just tried this on a completely up to date karmic machine: $ while true; do php -r ; done Segmentation fault (core dumped) Segfaults continue to appear every few seconds. $ php -v PHP 5.2.10-2ubuntu5 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.7 (cli) (built: Oct 13 2009 18:33:05) $ mysql --version mysql Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.83, for debian-linux-gnu (x86_64) using readline 5.2 -- php-cli segmentation fault with mysql extension https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/343870 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 418342] Re: akonadi-server prevents install of mysql-server-5.0
Hopefully I have done the right thing here: I'm pretty sure that the problem here is in the dependencies of akonadi-server, so I have attempted to pull in that package into this bug in order to bring it to the attention of the correct group. Please correct me if I'm wrong. :) -- akonadi-server prevents install of mysql-server-5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 418342] Re: akonadi-server prevents install of mysql-server-5.0
I'm pretty certain that this isn't fixed: # aptitude show akonadi-server Package: akonadi-server State: installed Automatically installed: no Version: 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 Priority: extra Section: net Maintainer: Kubuntu Developers kubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Uncompressed Size: 10.5M Depends: libakonadiprivate1 (= 1.2.0), libboost-program-options1.38.0 (= 1.38.0-1), libc6 (= 2.7), libgcc1 (= 1:4.1.1), libqt4-dbus (= 4.5.1), libqtcore4 (= 4.5.1), libstdc++6 (= 4.4.0), libwrap0 (= 7.6-4~), zlib1g (= 1:1.1.4), mysql-server-core-5.1, libqt4-sql-mysql Description: Akonadi PIM storage service Akonadi is an extensible cross-desktop Personal Information Management (PIM) storage service. It provides a common framework for applications to store and access mail, calendars, addressbooks, and other PIM data. (Up to date karmic system) Seems to depend specifically on mysql-server-core-5.1 ** Also affects: akonadi (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- akonadi-server prevents install of mysql-server-5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 418342] Re: akonadi-server prevents install of mysql-server-5.0
Hi, This says a fix was released on the 8th of this month, but as of today (the 17th) I am still not able to install MySQL 5.0 on my fully up to date karmic machine without having to uninstall large parts of kde. Is there some procedure that I need to follow in order to make the change I require, or is it just a case that I need to wait for the changes to trickle through? Thanks. -- akonadi-server prevents install of mysql-server-5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418342 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 414224] Re: Can not install akonadi-server dependency mysql-server-core-5.0 with mysql-server-5.1
At this point I appear to be having the exact opposite problem: akonadi- server is forcing the install of mysql-server-core-5.1, which is preventing me from installing mysql-server-5.0, which is what I actually want to be able to use. It seems to me that whatever akonadi-server needs, it shoudln't conflict with what database server the user wants to install. -- Can not install akonadi-server dependency mysql-server-core-5.0 with mysql-server-5.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 392521] Re: Segmentation fault when running any script
Just to comment that this happens to me too. We have a bzr plugin which adds a pre-commit hook which runs all new and modified PHP files in the commit though php -l, as a basic sanity checker. From time to time php -l will segfault on a perfectly valid PHP file. Re-attempting usually succeeds. It gets most annoying when trying to do a large commit, since the greater number of files increases the chance of the segfault occurring, and can result in an irritating number of attempts being required in order for the commit to succeed. I've encountered the problem on a single-processor i386 machine running jaunty, and just now encountered it on an amd64 dual core machine running an up to date karmic system. The test case in the original bug report does reproduce the problem for me, but not every time. For each set of 50, I usually get 0-2 instances of the segfault happening. -- Segmentation fault when running any script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392521 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 392521] Re: Segmentation fault when running any script
Just a quick note to add that this problem also happens if the file (a.php) is completely empty (zero-length). -- Segmentation fault when using php -l to validate any PHP script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392521 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 246322] Re: nis package must provide DHCP client scripts
Yes, the md5sum approach is what some other packages use - but ideally there wouldn't be the all or nothing and it'd only be applied to a file included from the main confiugration. The other part of this bug was to get those options added to the default dhclient.conf so this would all work out of the box. -- nis package must provide DHCP client scripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 246322] Re: nis package must provide DHCP client scripts
You're missing the point with laptops and so on: these are use cases that are already supported and can be broken by a poor DHCP implementation. This is especially the case if your preferred implementation with overwriting the configuration file were done - the user configuration would be unconditionally deleted if they connected to the wrong network. Adding a DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE note doesn't really address the problem: it's not really compliant with policy (users should be able to do static configuration) and means that it becomes impossible to set any configuration which is not offered over DHCP. You should do something like have the DHCP configuration go in a separate file and source that from the main configuration file. -- nis package must provide DHCP client scripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 246322] Re: nis package must provide DHCP client scripts
Yes, a Debconf note would be the way forward, though it'd have to be a low priority one. Note that I'm mostly talking about enabling this on upgrade here - new systems are a bit different since you won't damage anyone's running system. Given that this is Launchpad I'd presume that any discussion here is Ubuntu-specific. -- nis package must provide DHCP client scripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 303835] Re: Typo in ssh_config man page
I can confirm this bug, using an up to date Ubuntu 8.10, the typo is on line 51 of the man page ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Typo in ssh_config man page https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 210813] Re: package mysql-server-5.0 5.0.51a-3ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Configurando mysql-server-5.0 (5.0.67-0ubuntu6) ... * Stopping MySQL database server mysqld [ OK ] ERROR: 1146 Table 'mysql.user' doesn't exist 081213 7:59:42 [ERROR] Aborting 081213 7:59:42 [Note] /usr/sbin/mysqld: Shutdown complete Reloading AppArmor profiles : done. * /etc/init.d/mysql: ERROR: The partition with /var/lib/mysql is too full! invoke-rc.d: initscript mysql, action start failed. dpkg: erro processando mysql-server-5.0 (--configure): sub-processo post-installation script retornou estado de saída de erro 1 dpkg: problemas de dependência impedem a configuração de mysql-server: mysql-server depende de mysql-server-5.0; porém: Pacote mysql-server-5.0 não está configurado ainda. dpkg: erro processando mysql-server (--configure): problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado Nenhum relatório do apport gravado porque a mensagem de erro indica é o seguimento de um erro de uma falha anterior. Erros foram encontrados durante o processamento de: mysql-server-5.0 mysql-server E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) -- package mysql-server-5.0 5.0.51a-3ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210813 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 246322] Re: nis package must provide DHCP client scripts
** Changed in: nis (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Also affects: dhcp3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- nis package must provide DHCP client scripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246322 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dhcp3 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 239513] [NEW] stack smashing detected when calling xmlrpc_set_type
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: php5-xmlrpc $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 8.04 Release:8.04 php5-xmlrpc: Installed: 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.1 Candidate: 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.1 Version table: *** 5.2.4-2ubuntu5.1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 5.2.4-2ubuntu5 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com hardy/main Packages The following script reproduces: ?php $params = array(new DateTime()); $params[0] = $params[0]-format(DATE_ISO8601); xmlrpc_set_type($params[0], 'datetime'); ? $ php xmlrpc_datetime.php *** stack smashing detected ***: php terminated === Backtrace: = /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x48)[0xb7a38138] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x0)[0xb7a380f0] /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/xmlrpc.so[0xb71fc1c4] /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/xmlrpc.so[0xb71f990e] /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/xmlrpc.so(XMLRPC_CreateValueDateTime_ISO8601+0x37)[0xb71fa247] /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/xmlrpc.so(set_zval_xmlrpc_type+0x108)[0xb71f1238] /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/xmlrpc.so(zif_xmlrpc_set_type+0xf4)[0xb71f2ed4] php[0x82f35eb] php(execute+0x188)[0x82e4048] php(zend_execute_scripts+0x183)[0x82c2f13] php(php_execute_script+0x210)[0x8278d90] php(main+0x19da)[0x83553ea] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe0)[0xb7961450] php[0x8097ec1] === Memory map: 08048000-0855e000 r-xp 08:04 323708 /usr/bin/php5 0855e000-08594000 rw-p 00516000 08:04 323708 /usr/bin/php5 08594000-08732000 rw-p 08594000 00:00 0 [heap] b7178000-b717c000 r-xp 08:04 2997 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_dns-2.7.so b717c000-b717e000 rw-p 3000 08:04 2997 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_dns-2.7.so b717e000-b7187000 r-xp 08:04 2994 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_files-2.7.so b7187000-b7189000 rw-p 8000 08:04 2994 /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libnss_files-2.7.so b7189000-b71bc000 r-xp 08:04 40256 /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1.1.22 b71bc000-b71bd000 rw-p 00033000 08:04 40256 /usr/lib/libxslt.so.1.1.22 b71bd000-b71cd000 r-xp 08:04 27924 /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0.8.13 b71cd000-b71ce000 rw-p f000 08:04 27924 /usr/lib/libexslt.so.0.8.13 b71e6000-b71ec000 r-xp 08:04 323704 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/xsl.so b71ec000-b71ed000 rw-p 5000 08:04 323704 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/xsl.so b71ed000-b71ff000 r-xp 08:04 323720 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/xmlrpc.so b71ff000-b720 rw-p 00012000 08:04 323720 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/xmlrpc.so b720-b721e000 r-xp 08:04 32549 /usr/lib/libpq.so.5.1 b721e000-b721f000 rw-p 0001e000 08:04 32549 /usr/lib/libpq.so.5.1 b721f000-b7236000 r-xp 08:04 323735 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/pgsql.so b7236000-b7237000 rw-p 00017000 08:04 323735 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/pgsql.so b7237000-b724e000 r-xp 08:04 323746 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/mysqli.so b724e000-b725 rw-p 00016000 08:04 323746 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/mysqli.so b725-b73ec000 r-xp 08:04 90534 /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15.0.0 b73ec000-b742f000 rw-p 0019b000 08:04 90534 /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15.0.0 b742f000-b743 rw-p b742f000 00:00 0 b7433000-b7446000 r-xp 08:04 323769 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/pdo.so b7446000-b7448000 rw-p 00012000 08:04 323769 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/pdo.so b7448000-b7493000 r-xp 08:04 3077 /lib/libgcrypt.so.11.2.3 b7493000-b7495000 rw-p 0004a000 08:04 3077 /lib/libgcrypt.so.11.2.3 b7495000-b74a4000 r-xp 08:04 39957 /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3.0.12 b74a4000-b74a5000 rw-p e000 08:04 39957 /usr/lib/libtasn1.so.3.0.12 b74a5000-b7516000 r-xp 08:04 627694 /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.13.9.1 b7516000-b751b000 rw-p 00071000 08:04 627694 /usr/lib/libgnutls.so.13.9.1 b751b000-b7531000 r-xp 08:04 30923 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.22 b7531000-b7532000 rw-p 00015000 08:04 30923 /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2.0.22 b7532000-b753e000 r-xp 08:04 358399 /usr/lib/liblber-2.4.so.2.0.3 b753e000-b753f000 rw-p b000 08:04 358399 /usr/lib/liblber-2.4.so.2.0.3 b753f000-b757b000 r-xp 08:04 358400 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.4.so.2.0.3 b757b000-b757d000 rw-p 0003b000 08:04 358400 /usr/lib/libldap_r-2.4.so.2.0.3 b757d000-b757e000 rw-p b757d000 00:00 0 b757e000-b75ae000 r-xp 08:04 41008 /usr/lib/libidn.so.11.5.30 b75ae000-b75af000 rw-p 0002f000 08:04 41008 /usr/lib/libidn.so.11.5.30 b75af000-b75ea000 r-xp 08:04 41074 /usr/lib/libcurl.so.4.0.1 b75ea000-b75eb000 rw-p 0003b000 08:04 41074 /usr/lib/libcurl.so.4.0.1 b75f-b75f6000 r-xp 08:04 323736 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/pdo_pgsql.so b75f6000-b75f7000 rw-p 5000 08:04 323736 /usr/lib/php5/20060613+lfs/pdo_pgsql.so b75f7000-b7602000 r-xp 08:04 323745
[Bug 239513] Re: stack smashing detected when calling xmlrpc_set_type
$ uname -a Linux dorian 2.6.24-18-generic #1 SMP Wed May 28 20:27:26 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux -- stack smashing detected when calling xmlrpc_set_type https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 236373] [NEW] '/etc/init.d/nagios2 reload' causes nagios to exit (sends SIGTERM not SIGHUP)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nagios2 The init script for nagios kills nagios when the user requests the configuration to be reloaded. Nagios logs that it has received a SIGTERM rather than the expected SIGHUP. This appears to be a bug in the nagios2 (2.11-1ubuntu1) packages interaction with the lsb-base package in Hardy. This bug is not present in Debian with the 2.11-1 version of the nagios package. The nagios init script calls killproc from the lsb-base scripts, passing it 1 (HUP) as the signal to send to nagios, the lsb-base scripts convert this to a TERM instead of a HUP. I do not know if this is a bug in the lsb-base scripts, or the scripts being called incorrectly by the nagios init script, so I have filed this bug on Nagios as I suspect it is the more likely candidate to be at fault, it will be amazing if such a large bug in lsb-release managed to slip through the QA for an LTS release! To reproduce the bug on a Hardy system you can do the following: 1) Install nagios2 2) Start nagios, check that it is running, tail /var/log/nagios2/nagios.log 3) In another console run, /etc/init.d/nagios2 reload 4) Observe the following lines in the log file [1212255142] Nagios 2.11 starting... (PID=24439) [1212255142] LOG VERSION: 2.0 [1212255142] Finished daemonizing... (New PID=24440) reload command is executed at this point [1212256400] Caught SIGTERM, shutting down... [1212256401] Successfully shutdown... (PID=24440) I have attached a patch that works around this issue by modifying the init script to send a HUP directly rather than using the killproc method from the lsb-base scripts. When this patch is applied the correct behaviour is observed in the nagios log file after executing /etc/init.d/nagios2 reload [1212256426] Nagios 2.11 starting... (PID=27947) [1212256426] LOG VERSION: 2.0 [1212256427] Finished daemonizing... (New PID=27948) reload command is executed at this point [1212257232] Caught SIGHUP, restarting... [1212257232] Nagios 2.11 starting... (PID=27948) [1212257232] LOG VERSION: 2.0 ** Affects: nagios2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- '/etc/init.d/nagios2 reload' causes nagios to exit (sends SIGTERM not SIGHUP) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nagios2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 207633] Re: Fails with commented SSL configuration
1:1.0.5-1ubuntu2.2 (I noticed this bug because a security updated failed to install!). Having taken a brief time to download the hardy package and look at it it seems that someone else actually fixed this in Hardy shortly after I reported it. Due to causing problems with security updates it's worth considering fixing this for stable releases. I am rather disappointed in the lack of investigation that your response shows. ** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Incomplete = New -- Fails with commented SSL configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 207633] Re: Fails with commented SSL configuration
As described in the report I had one live and one commented copy of each of the SSL certificate file options in the configuration file. I don't any more since I wanted the security update to complete installation and restart imapd. I would imagine that this can be readily tested by editing the configuration file appropriately and doing something that re-runs postinst such as reinstalling or reconfiguring the package. ** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu Gutsy) Status: Incomplete = New -- Fails with commented SSL configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 207633] [NEW] Fails with commented SSL configuration
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dovecot-common The following code in the dovecot-common postinst: SSL_CERT=$( (grep ssl_cert_file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf || echo '/etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem') | cut -d'=' -f2) SSL_KEY=$( (grep ssl_key_file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf || echo '/etc/ssl/private/dovecot.pem') | cut -d'=' -f2) fails if there are commented out ssl_cert_file or ssl_key_file lines in the Dovecot configuration. ** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Fails with commented SSL configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 207633] Re: Fails with commented SSL configuration
I should add: this then causes the test for SSL keys being present immediately afterwards to fail, causing the postinst to fail during configuration. -- Fails with commented SSL configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to dovecot in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
