No, installed clamav as part of amavis.
update of signatures happens via freshclam.
I circumvent this by reinstalling libclamav6. But I doubt that
installing this library regularly after every upgrade should be a
solution.
usually happens after an update of clamav or the kernel.
I also
Public bug reported:
After upgrading from clamav-daemon 0.98.6 to 0.98.7 the daemon cannot be
started. Terminates with
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
the log shows:
Thu May 7 21:47:42 2015 - +++ Started at Thu May 7 21:47:42 2015
Thu May 7 21:47:42 2015 - clamd daemon 0.98.7 (OS:
Tried reinstall and reconfiguration
continue observation
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422677
Title:
clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and
It happens repeatedly since two days ago.
use Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Linux s4 3.2.0-76-generic #111-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan
13 22:16:09 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux)
I am afraid I cannot reproduce this as the error does not always happen
during startup of the daemon.
--
You received this bug
** Attachment added: freshclam.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+attachment/4320923/+files/freshclam.conf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: clamd.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+attachment/4320922/+files/clamd.conf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu Server 12.04
/var/log/syslog
...
Feb 17 11:41:49 s4 kernel: [ 176.520048] clamd[2600]: segfault at 7ff1d912fb08
ip 7ff11d073966 sp 72bc4fd8 error 4 in
libc-2.15.so[7ff11cf29000+1b5000]
Feb 17 11:42:03 s4 kernel: [ 190.110137] clamd[3303]: segfault at
Lots of speculations here.
My internal DNS server is 10.1.0.4. My fallback is the secondary
10.1.0.254 which acts as DNS forwarder and proxy to the third and
others.
The resolver works its way down: All things well = 10.1.0.4
Main server down: 10.1.0.254 will serve rudimentary internal services
First the bad news.
Name resolution drops after a few minutes of inactivity (approx.
30mins).
Same phenomenon as before.
Second: The name server answers as soon as the request arrives. dnsmasq
obviously takes some time to determine if it can serve the name itself.
So back to square one:
Did some testing
I set up the strict-order using the file approach as described above.
I see no different behaviour.
My bind does not get any queries at all. dnsmasq does not forward
requests.
Applications like Evolution or Thunderbird break on every reboot or
resume. It takes up to 3 minutes
I restarted my machine in order to test under correct circumstances. I
did restart the network manager but did not kill all dnsmasq explicitly.
Now after a reboot I can give you better results. Give me until tomorrow
for a complete test run
So far, Thunderbird did find the server immediately and
carried out some suspend/resume tests
worked fine.
tried some pings with name resolution:
It takes a long time to resolve the name but it works
seems that strict-order is the way to go in installations where an
internal DNS is supported by external backups / extensions
Can that be automated
Now I understand what you are getting at (took me a long time).
I can confirm that my DNS server serves any request from inside the
network. I have a log on the router monitoring outgoing traffic. Under
NO circumstances is a DNS request going out UNLESS the internal server
is down but the clients
nm-tool | grep DNS gives
DNS: 10.1.0.4
DNS: 10.1.0.254
DNS: 195.202.128.3
dig s4 gives nothing
wolf@mbp:~$ dig s4
; DiG 9.8.1-P1 s4
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 60009
;; flags: qr rd
In Ubuntu 12.10 this issue is as prominent as ever.
On resume from RAM or after boot, dnsmasq requires about 5 minutes to
resolve names correctly.
Workaround: For ssh I use IP addresses
Thunderbird requires a 5 Minute waiting period after resume
Evolution requires two or three attempts to start,
Thomas,
I understand that you have not set up a simulation test bed and that
your questions are directed to understand the problem. You have found
out that you may have misinterpreted some pieces.
Reggie seems to have the same problem as I (and to my knowledge more
than a dozen of others) have.
Thomas,
there is no local named on any notebook here.
dnsmasq does not interfere with named on any of my machines.
It should actually not even be possible. As far as I am concerned, the
bind() request should return false and give an EADDRINUSE if the socket
was already bound by something.
In fact my point of view is that I have submitted all information I could
provide in reasonable time.
Give me a bunch of experiments I have to carry out, I'll spend an afternoon to
help resolve the issue
From my point of view, I have given you more than enough input to
localise the issue (see
My /var/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf contained
server=10.1.0.4
server=10.1.0.254
server=195.202.128.3
wolf@mbp:~$ ps -elf | grep dnsmasq
4 S nobody 25661 25624 0 80 0 - 7579 poll_s 15:20 ?00:00:00
/usr/sbin/dnsmasq --no-resolv --keep-in-foreground --no-hosts --bind-interfaces
The /etc/resolv.conf held just a reference to 127.0.0.1
# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search rsb.intern rsb.at
I copied a working version over it:
#
I recreated the situation by restarting the network manager.
resolv.conf contains link to 127.0.0.1
/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf contained my name server already.
However, even dig does not resolv correctly. Here are the results (my
network is 10.x.x.x actually)
wolf@mbp:~$ ping s4
ping: unknown
Public bug reported:
dnsmasq does not resolve DNS names correcty.
Applications like Thunderbird or tools like ssh rely on working name
resolution. However, if there never was a working name resolution,
dnsmasq never gets to know about the DNS names.
Setup:
private network: 192.168.0.x/24
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712
Title:
dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
The file is empty since the update to 11.04 (in my case at least)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850771
Title:
package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 286828 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828
I think this is a bug in OOo 3.0
my params:
uname -a
Linux wb 2.6.27-10-generic #1 SMP Fri Nov 21 19:19:18 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
OOO300m9 (Build: 9358) openoffice.org 1:2.0.0.6ubuntu0intrepid1
1.
25 matches
Mail list logo
