[Bug 1452879] Re: clamav-daemon fails after update

2015-05-08 Thread Wolf Rogner
No, installed clamav as part of amavis.

update of signatures happens via freshclam.

I circumvent this by reinstalling libclamav6. But I doubt that
installing this library regularly after every upgrade should be a
solution.

usually happens after an update of clamav or the kernel.

I also suspected the disk to be the cause. Negative. Thorough scans demonstrate 
no errors on the disk.
I use LVM. Maybe the lvm corrupts the library. But then: Why only parts of clam?

I checked for a sign that the server is compromised (or partly
compromised). Negative (to my best understanding). No signs of network
access from outside (used an independent network based IDS on my NAS).

So I think (unless you inform me to the better), that the issue lies
within clamav-daemon and the libclamav6.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452879

Title:
  clamav-daemon fails after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1452879/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1452879] [NEW] clamav-daemon fails after update

2015-05-07 Thread Wolf Rogner
Public bug reported:

After upgrading from clamav-daemon 0.98.6 to 0.98.7 the daemon cannot be 
started. Terminates with
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

the log shows:
Thu May  7 21:47:42 2015 - +++ Started at Thu May  7 21:47:42 2015
Thu May  7 21:47:42 2015 - clamd daemon 0.98.7 (OS: linux-gnu, ARCH: x86_64, 
CPU: x86_64)
Thu May  7 21:47:42 2015 - Log file size limited to 4294967295 bytes.
Thu May  7 21:47:42 2015 - Reading databases from /var/lib/clamav
Thu May  7 21:47:42 2015 - Not loading PUA signatures.
Thu May  7 21:47:42 2015 - Bytecode: Security mode set to TrustSigned.
Thu May  7 21:47:47 2015 - Loaded 3802690 signatures.

then it terminates.
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: clamav-daemon 0.98.7+dfsg-0ubuntu0.12.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-83.120-generic 3.2.68
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-83-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu May  7 21:42:32 2015
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 
(20111011)
MarkForUpload: True
SourcePackage: clamav
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-01 (1101 days ago)

** Affects: clamav (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1452879

Title:
  clamav-daemon fails after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1452879/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1422677] Re: clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and libclamav.so.6.1.25

2015-02-18 Thread Wolf Rogner
Tried reinstall and reconfiguration

continue observation

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422677

Title:
  clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and
  libclamav.so.6.1.25

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1422677] Re: clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and libclamav.so.6.1.25

2015-02-18 Thread Wolf Rogner
It happens repeatedly since two days ago.

use Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (Linux s4 3.2.0-76-generic #111-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan
13 22:16:09 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux)

I am afraid I cannot reproduce this as the error does not always happen
during startup of the daemon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422677

Title:
  clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and
  libclamav.so.6.1.25

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1422677] Re: clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and libclamav.so.6.1.25

2015-02-17 Thread Wolf Rogner
** Attachment added: freshclam.conf
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+attachment/4320923/+files/freshclam.conf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422677

Title:
  clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and
  libclamav.so.6.1.25

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1422677] Re: clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and libclamav.so.6.1.25

2015-02-17 Thread Wolf Rogner
** Attachment added: clamd.conf
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+attachment/4320922/+files/clamd.conf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422677

Title:
  clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and
  libclamav.so.6.1.25

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1422677] [NEW] clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and libclamav.so.6.1.25

2015-02-17 Thread Wolf Rogner
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu Server 12.04

/var/log/syslog
...
Feb 17 11:41:49 s4 kernel: [  176.520048] clamd[2600]: segfault at 7ff1d912fb08 
ip 7ff11d073966 sp 72bc4fd8 error 4 in 
libc-2.15.so[7ff11cf29000+1b5000]
Feb 17 11:42:03 s4 kernel: [  190.110137] clamd[3303]: segfault at 7f7f3d8f 
ip 7f3da24931c5 sp 7fffb06449d8 error 4 in 
libclamav.so.6.1.25[7f3da2349000+9f1000]
...

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: clamav 0.98.6+dfsg-0ubuntu0.12.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-76.111-generic 3.2.66
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-76-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Feb 17 11:43:32 2015
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 
(20111011)
MarkForUpload: True
SourcePackage: clamav
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-05-01 (1021 days ago)

** Affects: clamav (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

** Attachment removed: .etc.clamav.clamd.conf.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+attachment/4320917/+files/.etc.clamav.clamd.conf.txt

** Attachment removed: .etc.clamav.freshclam.conf.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+attachment/4320918/+files/.etc.clamav.freshclam.conf.txt

** Attachment removed: Dependencies.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+attachment/4320919/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment removed: ProcEnviron.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+attachment/4320920/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1422677

Title:
  clamav failed due to error 4 segfault in libc-2.15.so and
  libclamav.so.6.1.25

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1422677/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

2012-12-14 Thread Wolf Rogner
Lots of speculations here.

My internal DNS server is 10.1.0.4. My fallback is the secondary
10.1.0.254 which acts as DNS forwarder and proxy to the third and
others.

The resolver works its way down: All things well = 10.1.0.4
Main server down: 10.1.0.254 will serve rudimentary internal services and 
redirects all requests to external DNSs
The third server is there as we need two DNS servers for official domain name 
registrations.

I have another issue: If dnsmasq is on via Network Manager opening a VPN
connection to a remote site violates all name resolution to internal
addresses (10.x.x.x).

Here is the catch:

If I turn off dnsmasq, all things work as expected. Names get resolved
correctyl in all networks (internal, remote and external).

I travel a lot and have my notebook set to attach in all these networks
automatically. It worked fine until dnsmasq was introduced.

I doubt that dnsmasq queries D-Bus for name resolution. And even if so,
I question if there is an order that says D-bus, then resolv.conf or
vice versa. To verify this, I will download the source and look into how
dnsmasq works internally.

I even question if my current understanding how DNS works is even
accurate. There are so many RFCs that cover DNS mDNS and others that I
need to update my knowledge first. I would not want you to search for
something that actually does not exist.

All I can confirm at the moment is that disabling dnsmasq (even if that
implies doing this on a multitude of machines) leads to a constantly
working infrastructure with far better performance.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

2012-12-13 Thread Wolf Rogner
First the bad news.

Name resolution drops after a few minutes of inactivity (approx.
30mins).

Same phenomenon as before.

Second: The name server answers as soon as the request arrives. dnsmasq
obviously takes some time to determine if it can serve the name itself.

So back to square one: disabling dnsmasq: immediate and correct name resolution 
(I am talking about not recognisable delays).
enabling dnsmasq the problems begin (with a difference if set to strict-order). 
Name resolution takes 

Name resolution after reboot and resume now work fine. Unfortunately
after some time it does not any more. Same symptoms as without strict-
order.

Just read the man-pages:

-o serves in the order resolv.conf offers!

but here is what my resolv.conf looks like

# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 127.0.1.1
search rsb.intern rsb.at

So it refers to itself.

There is no dnsmasq.conf file where the dns servers are defined (not installed 
by default).
Network manager just starts dnsmasq but hat no information about the network 
either.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

2012-12-12 Thread Wolf Rogner
Did some testing

I set up the strict-order using the file approach as described above.

I see no different behaviour.

My bind does not get any queries at all. dnsmasq does not forward
requests.

Applications like Evolution or Thunderbird break on every reboot or
resume. It takes up to 3 minutes for them to get a hold of the right
server settings.

The only working solution is turing dnsmasq off.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

2012-12-12 Thread Wolf Rogner
I restarted my machine in order to test under correct circumstances. I
did restart the network manager but did not kill all dnsmasq explicitly.

Now after a reboot I can give you better results. Give me until tomorrow
for a complete test run

So far, Thunderbird did find the server immediately and Evolution could
connect to my internal mail server as well.

I will do suspend and resume tomorrow.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

2012-12-12 Thread Wolf Rogner
carried out some suspend/resume tests

worked fine.

tried some pings with name resolution:

It takes a long time to resolve the name but it works

seems that strict-order is the way to go in installations where an
internal DNS is supported by external backups / extensions

Can that be automated during setup?
It should be pretty obvious that if there is a DNS server on the same LAN 
segment that it is preferable to any DNS on a different LAN. This would 
actually mirror the behaviour of DNS according to the RFCs

Just a thought.
Thanks for the help and clarification

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

2012-12-11 Thread Wolf Rogner
Now I understand what you are getting at (took me a long time).

I can confirm that my DNS server serves any request from inside the
network. I have a log on the router monitoring outgoing traffic. Under
NO circumstances is a DNS request going out UNLESS the internal server
is down but the clients still have their DHCP settings.

I verify this regularly as part of my error testing procedures. This is
why I even use an external DNS server as my bind forwards DNS requests
in case it cannot resolve them itself.

Now there could be a client timeout (which occures in very rare cases,
say once a year per client). In that case, the browser (which is the
only app that might get affected) will simply provide a 404 page and a
reload usually works.

None of my dnsmasqed clients requests from the external server when our
internal bind is up.

I will try to put dnsmasq into strict mode for testing.

Get back to you with results after some time.

Merry Christmas

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

2012-12-10 Thread Wolf Rogner
nm-tool | grep DNS gives

DNS: 10.1.0.4
DNS: 10.1.0.254
DNS: 195.202.128.3

dig s4 gives nothing

wolf@mbp:~$ dig s4

;  DiG 9.8.1-P1  s4
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 60009
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;s4.IN  A

;; Query time: 1 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.1.1#53(127.0.1.1)
;; WHEN: Mon Dec 10 21:52:10 2012
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 20

but
dig s4 + search returns s4.rsb.intern IP and the domain rsb.intern

wolf@mbp:~$ dig s4 +search

;  DiG 9.8.1-P1  s4 +search
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28303
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;s4.rsb.intern. IN  A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
s4.rsb.intern.  34000   IN  A   10.1.0.4

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
rsb.intern. 34000   IN  NS  s4.rsb.intern.

;; Query time: 1 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.1.1#53(127.0.1.1)
;; WHEN: Mon Dec 10 21:51:24 2012
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 61

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

2012-12-04 Thread Wolf Rogner
In Ubuntu 12.10 this issue is as prominent as ever.

On resume from RAM or after boot, dnsmasq requires about 5 minutes to
resolve names correctly.

Workaround: For ssh I use IP addresses
Thunderbird requires a 5 Minute waiting period after resume
Evolution requires two or three attempts to start, then it works

On most of my machines I disabled dnsmasq

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

2012-06-08 Thread Wolf Rogner
Thomas,

I understand that you have not set up a simulation test bed and that
your questions are directed to understand the problem. You have found
out that you may have misinterpreted some pieces.

Reggie seems to have the same problem as I (and to my knowledge more
than a dozen of others) have.

I have described the issues dnsmasq has somewhere else.

Here is another observation I can offer:

eliminating dnsmasq makes machines respond within seconds. Network
reconnect after resume from sleep as well as after a reboot works
immediately. Thunderbird (another issue I submitted) connects to the
mail server without problems.

using dnsmasq, network reconnect (over WLAN) takes significantly longer (almost 
5 secs).
Even though ping and dig resolv host names correctly (in out case s4 or 
mail.rsb.intern) Thunderbird does not connect. That implies that the connection 
dnsmasq and resolver libraries is broken as well. It works eventually (say 
after 1min or 5, not preproducably different). Curiously it stops working again 
even when the machine continues to operate.

Again: This was tested on several machines.
And, yes: Disabling dnsmasq in NetworkManager.conf resolves ALL issues at once: 
Network reconnect in less than a second, name resolution to mail and 
mail.rsb.intern works fine (what else should the search path hold?).

Referring to my reluctance of giving more than the basic information:
Everyone can read Launchpad entries. This is a severe security issue.

I try to be helpful but if you do not have the means to provide
significant testing equipment, maybe taking dnsmasq out of an LTS would
be the better solution.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  domain name completion broken when dnsmasq is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-04 Thread Wolf Rogner
Thomas,

there is no local named on any notebook here.

dnsmasq does not interfere with named on any of my machines.

It should actually not even be possible. As far as I am concerned, the
bind() request should return false and give an EADDRINUSE if the socket
was already bound by something.

Unless dnsmasq uses a different technique to attach itself to port 53.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-03 Thread Wolf Rogner
In fact my point of view is that I have submitted all information I could 
provide in reasonable time.
Give me a bunch of experiments I have to carry out, I'll spend an afternoon to 
help resolve the issue

From my point of view, I have given you more than enough input to
localise the issue (see other bugs as well).

Feel free to drop. The issue is still here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-06-01 Thread Wolf Rogner
My /var/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf contained

server=10.1.0.4
server=10.1.0.254
server=195.202.128.3

wolf@mbp:~$ ps -elf | grep dnsmasq
4 S nobody   25661 25624  0  80   0 -  7579 poll_s 15:20 ?00:00:00 
/usr/sbin/dnsmasq --no-resolv --keep-in-foreground --no-hosts --bind-interfaces 
--pid-file=/var/run/sendsigs.omit.d/network-manager.dnsmasq.pid 
--listen-address=127.0.0.1 --conf-file=/var/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf 
--cache-size=0 --proxy-dnssec
0 S wolf 25774 25489  0  80   0 -  2720 pipe_w 15:21 pts/100:00:00 grep 
--color=auto dnsmasq
wolf@mbp:~$ 

Thomas, please understand that I don't have the time to reiterate on
situations that I have solved by reverting back to the original state. I
gave you enough hints to solve the issue. You can set up a situation
like mine in a bunch of virtual machines and simulate the effects.

I have a solution by disabling dnsmasq in network manager.

You might as well close this incident. But this will not fix the bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-31 Thread Wolf Rogner
The /etc/resolv.conf held just a reference to 127.0.0.1

# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search rsb.intern rsb.at

I copied a working version over it:

# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 10.1.0.4
nameserver 10.1.0.254
nameserver 195.202.128.3
search rsb.intern rsb.at

That way, name resolution worked immediately.
This brings back the old and stable name resolution. As far as I can observe 
this, no side effects as you discussed in #1003842


So far I have disabled dnsmasq in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf


Currently my view is that dnsmasq has some serious issues:

- name resolution in mixed DNS setups
- handling of refreshes of network manager (happens periodically with calls to 
resolvconf, aperiodically when new SSIDs emerge, network media changes or the 
machine is put into sleep mode)
- VPN management (which requires several different domains to be intersected)
- caching of resolved names
- handling of /etc/hosts

Hope this helps.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-17 Thread Wolf Rogner
I recreated the situation by restarting the network manager.

resolv.conf contains link to 127.0.0.1
/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf contained my name server already.

However, even dig does not resolv correctly. Here are the results (my
network is 10.x.x.x actually)

wolf@mbp:~$ ping s4
ping: unknown host s4
wolf@mbp:~$ dig s4

;  DiG 9.8.1-P1  s4
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 27930
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;s4.IN  A

;; Query time: 3 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Thu May 17 11:07:39 2012
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 20

wolf@mbp:~$ dig @10.1.0.4 s4

;  DiG 9.8.1-P1  @10.1.0.4 s4
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 34081
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;s4.IN  A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.   10800   IN  SOA a.root-servers.net. 
nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2012051700 1800 900 604800 86400

;; Query time: 21 msec
;; SERVER: 10.1.0.4#53(10.1.0.4)
;; WHEN: Thu May 17 11:07:50 2012
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 95

wolf@mbp:~$ dig @10.1.0.4 s4.rsb.intern

;  DiG 9.8.1-P1  @10.1.0.4 s4.rsb.intern
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 35717
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;s4.rsb.intern. IN  A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
s4.rsb.intern.  34000   IN  A   10.1.0.4

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
rsb.intern. 34000   IN  NS  s4.rsb.intern.

;; Query time: 3 msec
;; SERVER: 10.1.0.4#53(10.1.0.4)
;; WHEN: Thu May 17 11:08:03 2012
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 61

wolf@mbp:~$ less /run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf 
wolf@mbp:~$ dig s4

;  DiG 9.8.1-P1  s4
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 18553
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;s4.IN  A

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
.   10725   IN  SOA a.root-servers.net. 
nstld.verisign-grs.com. 2012051700 1800 900 604800 86400

;; Query time: 14 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Thu May 17 11:09:05 2012
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 95

wolf@mbp:~$ ping s4
PING s4.rsb.intern (10.1.0.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
^X^C64 bytes from 10.1.0.4: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.792 ms

--- s4.rsb.intern ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.792/0.792/0.792/0.000 ms
wolf@mbp:~$ 

I have not quite figured out what exactly happens. It takes about 1 to
30 minutes to resolve the issue. On some machines it never settles
itself.

Certainly, if I manually adjust /etc/resolv.conf everthing works fine
immediately (name resolution, access to services). If I keep the files
the way they are, it is pure coincidence whether dns works (I had the
chance to use a wired LAN recently and it seems to be the same issue
there).

My guess would be that network manager and dns-mask do not work together
in all cases (in fact, they do cooperate only in just one case, after a
reboot). As I never reboot machines (if I don't have to), I put machines
to sleep, connect, disconnect, I practically never run into the optimal
situation.

Hope this helps.

Wolf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] [NEW] dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-13 Thread Wolf Rogner
Public bug reported:

dnsmasq does not resolve DNS names correcty.

Applications like Thunderbird or tools like ssh rely on working name
resolution. However, if there never was a working name resolution,
dnsmasq never gets to know about the DNS names.

Setup:

private network: 192.168.0.x/24
domain mydomain.intern
server: 192.168.0.1 hostname s1
dhcp (.100 - .200) and bind running, postfix and dovecot running
client: 192.168.0.100 (dhclient)

/etc/resolv.conf
...
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search mydomain.intern

/var/run/nm-dns-dnsmasq.conf
server=192.168.0.1

Open Thunderbird - Thunderbird fails to open s1
ssh admin@s1 - ssh: Could not resolve hostname s1: Name or service not known

Adding
nameserver 192.168.0.1
to /etc/resolv.conf

resolves the issue immediately

calling sudo resolvconf -u

creates the lookup problem immediately again

This is a critical error

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: dnsmasq-base 2.59-4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia wl
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun May 13 11:43:02 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64+mac (20111012)
SourcePackage: dnsmasq
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-04-29 (13 days ago)

** Affects: dnsmasq (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 998712] Re: dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

2012-05-13 Thread Wolf Rogner
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998712

Title:
  dnsmasq integration into name resolution broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/+bug/998712/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 850771] Re: package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2011-10-07 Thread Wolf Rogner
The file is empty since the update to 11.04 (in my case at least)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850771

Title:
  package samba 2:3.5.8~dfsg-1ubuntu2.3 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/850771/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 279789] Re: [jaunty] openoffice cannot write to samba shares (some kind of gvfs timeout?)

2008-12-09 Thread Wolf Rogner
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 286828 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286828

I think this is a bug in OOo 3.0

my params:

uname -a
Linux wb 2.6.27-10-generic #1 SMP Fri Nov 21 19:19:18 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux

OOO300m9 (Build: 9358) openoffice.org 1:2.0.0.6ubuntu0intrepid1

1. GEdit (as any other apps) works fine on my machines with gfvs.
2. OOo 2.4.1 works fine

= There is nothing wrong with the kernel or gvfs

3. OOo 3.0 does not save files on smb shares. Produces well known error message 
(see above)
4. Saving same file as text or MS Office format works fine.

= This must have something to do with the new ODF1.2 format filter

5. There is no ODF 1.1 filter !!!
6. There is no docx filter either ??? (Its supposed to be somewhere)

-- 
[jaunty] openoffice cannot write to samba shares (some kind of gvfs timeout?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/279789
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu (via bug 286828).

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs