Additionally, the message from the old server is misleading.
precise$ whois devunt.kr | less
...
ECU+0083U+0081湲B0 ECA0U+0095蹂대U+008AU+0094 UTF-8 EC
U+009D몄BDU+0094EBU+0094⑸U+0090U+0098ECU+0096B4
ECU+0084U+009C鍮U+0084ECU+008AㅻU+0090U+0098怨A0
ECU+009EU+0088EC
U+008A듬U+008BU+0088EBU+008BA4.
(iconv tells me it cannot convert from EUC-KR to UTF-8 from the old
input so I'm not sure if that's actually true, but the domain should be
set up to use the new, well-defined server anyway.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Upstream 5.0.23 fixed this issue. There is no separate upstream bug
report.
http://ftp-
master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/w/whois/unstable_changelog
** Changed in: whois (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Public bug reported:
After enabling precise-updates for universe, krb5-user is not
installable. It depends on libkrb5-3 = 1.10+dfsg~beta1-2ubuntu0.3 but
there is no such version in the repositories.
precise# apt-cache policy krb5-user
krb5-user:
Installed: (none)
Candidate:
I imagine this may be a duplicate of bug #1100177 but it was rather
messy so I opted to create a new bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1100177
Title:
Turns out the problem was that I lacked the precise-updates repo for
main.
** Changed in: krb5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
Is this a duplicate of bug #1100177?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to krb5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039598
Title:
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
To manage notifications about this bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: whois
I'm speculating the Connection refused means the server name in whois
is wrong. There is a whois server at whois.aeda.net.ae which appears
authoritative. They offer a web lookup at http://whois.aeda.net.ae/ as
well.
ubu...@ubuntu$ whois
I spent a lot of time investigating this, and would have avoided that if
it had been documented. I'd still like to request the addition of a
small snippet to README.Debian but since I'm an Ubuntu user I didn't
want to take this directly upstream. If I submit this upstream, with a
small patch,
I'm taking the liberty to set this to Incomplete as the question from
2007 about whether this is still a problem has gone unanswered.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Incomplete
--
Printing does not work: PID 23402 (/usr/lib/cups/backend/smb) crashed on signal
6
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
Incorrect hyperlink in samba-docs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba-common
The directory /etc/samba contains a spurious file gdbcommands which does
not appear to be documented. To the extent that I am able to guess what
it's for, it should probably simply be removed, or else documented e.g.
in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
