From what I can see it is.
On 03/20/2011 08:57 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
@waltc,
is this bug fixed for you in the latest natty qemu-kvm? Latest natty is
based on qemu-kvm-0.14.0 release, which you say includes the fixes you
were looking for.
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723983
Title:
virtio-net performance in 10Gbs lan
--
I don't know that I can successfully vet the fix. I can say from the hit
I found on some forum the guy with the 10Gb network verified as fixed
after applying the 'bottom-half fix. I will try that this w/e. I see you
changed the status to incomplete. Is that due to waiting on me? Oh, I
also
My omission. I thought I had said I was on 10.10. I am at 10.10 for both
UEC as well as guests. I merely tried 11.04 to see if that resolved the
issue. However I really didn't expect to see a change, my nic is 1Gb. I
was helping a guy on the Euca mb that didn't realize there was a
virtio_net and
I believe this is fixed in QEMU 0.14... referring to changelist (first
paragraph) on
http://wiki.qemu.org/Changelog/0.14#virtio
The references I gave above specifically referenced the authors applying
the 'bottom-half' fix, although they did not, as I recall, mention what
the fixed was against.
I used iperf -s on one instance and iperf -c xxx.xx.xx.xx on the client
image of two guest OS's running under UEC.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723983
Title:
I tried running natty guests and the results were actually slightly
slower. This makes sense as kvm is a host component and qemu is
affiliated with kvm. Presumably there is no guest component?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Public bug reported:
Is this a bug or configuration?
virtio_net performance
In the course of helping a fellow UEC user he, and consequently we, hit a
potential bug. In the case of a system with an e1000 or even a Realtek NIK or
simulated NIC performance sucks with the emulated driver in an
I also got this error on 10.10 and, to David's comment, changing the
name of the --hostname bypassed the problem as you created a new vm. But
using virsh or virt-manager to delete the pre-existing image resolved
the problem. However, my question is this. Is the -o option intended to
remove any
I have eucalytus at 2.0~bzr1241-0ubuntu4,1
I receive the following when sourcing eucarc
WARN: Walrus URL is not configured.
In reviewing the cloud-error.log It shows an initial failure with
13:32:55 ERROR [SystemConfiguration:529263...@qtp-248808824-7]
Is this going to be fixed and, if so, when?
I have this problem as well and the ec2- tools appear broken in lucid as
well.
Consequently I, and presumably others, can't build specialized images.
--
vmbuilder: error: no such option: --firstlogin
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550689
You
What I discovered, which means there are several paths to this problem,
is the private address, in this case, remained valid. I can connect via
the private address.
I tried to connect then release with the intent of connect the original
ip address of 192.168.3.100 but in both cases got the error
OK, you asked for more information. I gave you the requested
information. Could this bug be placed in a status where it won't self
destruct if nobody picks it up in 53 days?
Thanks
--
otherwise live instance goes deaf connection refused
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587340
You received this
I believe it is 1.6.2
I followed https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEC/PackageInstall to a tee.
The only variation was rather than installing on a 10.4 image of Ubuntu Server
I installed it on Ubuntu Desktop at 10.4.
In order to insure the public addresses given the install script of the
Public bug reported:
I had an instance up and running for hours, quite successfully. I left
it alone for awhile and when I went back to that cmd session the window
was dead, as when you shell into another machine and drop the vpn. In
that case the entire window is unresponsive.
I tried opening
There is more history and documentation in Question #112157
Effectively I am running the cluster controller of a managednvlan UEC on an
instance of Ubuntu 10.4 Desktop. What I had noticed, over time is running
instances would go deaf, often times with what looks like valid IP addresses
listed
16 matches
Mail list logo
