[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2013-09-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package lxc - 1.0.0~alpha1-0ubuntu2 --- lxc (1.0.0~alpha1-0ubuntu2) saucy; urgency=low * Add allow-stderr to autopkgtst restrictions as the Ubuntu template uses policy-rc.d to disable some daemons and that causes a message to be printed on stderr

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2013-06-11 Thread Serge Hallyn
The go API bindings have been tested with a large number of simultaneous create/start/destroys, so I believe the upstream API thread-safety work must have fixed this at least upstream. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-07-10 Thread Gary Poster
Note that the workaround helps significantly but is not always sufficient. If I do not apply it, I can reliably encounter the problem every single test run. Another team is working on moving us to run on Precise in production, which would let us use Precise containers. Precise containers do not

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-07-09 Thread Gary Poster
This was working very well for us, and the lxc-start-ephemeral TRIES=60 was working fine. Starting last week, we began seeing recurrence of this problem, even with the workarounds applied and TRIES hacked to 180. I intend to circle around with Serge and see if he has any other ideas. -- You

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
Thanks, Gary, I'll try to reproduce this. ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014916 Title: simultaneously

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
@Gary, I wasn't able to reproduce this on a m1.xlarge. Regarding needing disk space, note that /dev/vdb1 should have a large amount of disk. You can unmount /mnt, pvcreate /dev/xvdb; vgcreate lxc /dev/xvdb; then use -B lvm as an additional lxc-create flag to create an lvm-backed container.

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
I wasn't able to reproduce this on a cc2.8xlarge either. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014916 Title: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014916 Title: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
Ok I've been able to reproduce this. I've tried with lvm snapshot containers - those did NOT do this. I don't understand why, unless it's simply the timing. I used the following script: cat notit.sh #!/bin/bash maclist=[] i=0 for c in /var/lib/lxc/*/config; do mac=`grep lxc.network.hwaddr

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
Actually simply disabling udevtrigger.conf doesn't work, because in lucid eth0 won't then come up. You also need to change the start on for /etc/init/networking.conf to start on (local-filesystems) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-19 Thread Serge Hallyn
(lowering priority as there is a workaround) ** Changed in: lxc (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium = Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014916 Title: simultaneously

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-19 Thread Gary Poster
Serge, thank you! The workaround appears to work very well for us. The containers started quickly, and it should not only give us more reliable starts but also seems to have taken at least three minutes off our average run time, as you might expect. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1014916] Re: simultaneously started lucid containers pause while starting after the first seven

2012-06-18 Thread Gary Poster
** Description changed: We are gathering more data, but it feels like we have enough to start a bug report. On Precise, on a 16 core/32 thread EC2 machine (instance type cc2.8xlarge), when starting approximately eight or more Lucid containers - simultaneously, after the first seven or