[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-05-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package qemu - 2.1+dfsg-4ubuntu6.5 --- qemu (2.1+dfsg-4ubuntu6.5) utopic-proposed; urgency=medium * debian/control-in: enable numa on architectures where numa is built (LP: #1417937) -- Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:13:00

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-05-12 Thread Serge Hallyn
Verified on utopic. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417937 Title: qemu appears to be built

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-18 Thread Chris J Arges
Hello Chris, or anyone else affected, Accepted qemu into utopic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/2.1+dfsg- 4ubuntu6.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-17 Thread Chris Friesen
One could argue that the NUMA functionality wasn't intentionally turned off (it was inherited from debian) and thus re-enabling it would be fixing a bug. Just as some background...the kilo release of OpenStack (currently under way) introduced support for NUMA guests (per-NUMA node hugepage

Re: [Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-17 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Chris Friesen (chris.frie...@windriver.com): One could argue that the NUMA functionality wasn't intentionally turned off (it was inherited from debian) and thus re-enabling it would be fixing a bug. That would definitely be the case if it had been on in precise or trusty, but that

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-17 Thread Serge Hallyn
** Also affects: qemu (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417937 Title: qemu appears to be built without

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-17 Thread Serge Hallyn
** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417937 Title: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-17 Thread Chris Friesen
I don't want to give you more work than necessary. If we can get it for utopic that'd be great...at least then we'd have one formally released version of Ubuntu that supported it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-17 Thread Serge Hallyn
** Description changed: + === + SRU Justification + 1. Impact: openstack cannot use numactl to pin kvm to cpus + 2. Test case: ldd /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86* | grep numa + 3. Regression potential: this causes qemu to be build against

Re: [Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-16 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting li,chen (chen...@intel.com): would this be back-port to utopic ? It's a new features, so doesn't strictly fall under SRU guidelines. (See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-14 Thread li,chen
would this be back-port to utopic ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417937 Title: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined To manage notifications about

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package qemu - 1:2.2+dfsg-5expubuntu5 --- qemu (1:2.2+dfsg-5expubuntu5) vivid; urgency=medium * debian/control-in: enable numa on architectures where numa is built (LP: #1417937) -- Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:18:58

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-12 Thread Serge Hallyn
Looks like libnuma is not supported on arm. That complicates the enablement. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417937 Title: qemu appears to be built without

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-12 Thread Chris Friesen
Is it possible to conditionally enable it based on architecture? Or does Ubuntu try to keep the packages configured the same across all architectures? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-12 Thread Serge Hallyn
Yup, we should be able to do Build-depends: libnuam-dev [ x86 arm64 ... ] I will test something along those lines tomorrow. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417937

[Bug 1417937] Re: qemu appears to be built without CONFIG_NUMA defined

2015-02-04 Thread Serge Hallyn
It looks like it is mainly disabled because it is in Debian, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758189 The reasons for disabling it in Debian don't strictly apply in ubuntu, so it may be ok for us to enable it. status: triaged importance: high ** Bug watch added: Debian