golang (2:1.5-0ubuntu1) wily; urgency=medium
* New upstream release.
- Drop debian/patches/disable-duffzero-ppc64el.patch
* Breaks/Replaces: older golang-go.tools (LP: 1486560)
** Changed in: golang (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification
Ah, and I almost forgot, please describe the changes since RC 1 (from
the upstream changelog or wherever) since this will require a feature
freeze exception.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to golang in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: golang (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: golang (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: golang (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
My concern isn't so much in that these binaries come with the source --
it sounds suboptimal, but it's not quite as bad as shipping binary blobs
we haven't built ourselves...
That's the main issue I have with it and with removing the line from
rules which deletes .syso files (note that we
Here's a more limited diff that retains the deletion of the syso files.
For the record here are all the changes between the rc1 release and
final: https://github.com/golang/go/compare/go1.5rc1...go1.5
They are all bugfix releases, but in any case I had already talked to a
release team member
On 26 August 2015 at 03:15, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
mathieu...@gmail.com wrote:
My concern isn't so much in that these binaries come with the source --
it sounds suboptimal, but it's not quite as bad as shipping binary blobs
we haven't built ourselves...
Right, but as I tried to say, this is
NB: it only requires a feature freeze exception if it's a featureful
upload. if the differences between rc1 and final are just bugfixes, no
need to enumerate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to golang in Ubuntu.
cypermox said by email:
it seems to me like not removing the .syso files, which are both
arch-dependent and prebuilt binaries we cannot verify have been
built with the source provided (even if there is strong suspicion
that they were) is the wrong approach to fixing these
tests.
This is
