[Bug 1540401] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-03-03 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From manju...@in.ibm.com 2016-03-03 08:04 EDT--- (In reply to comment #78) > I verified the problem is resolved w/ the package in -proposed on the QEMU > guest scenario. > Waiting on bug repoter's verification, then will mark verification-done. > > Thanks Thank you Mauricio !!

[Bug 1540401] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-03-02 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mauri...@br.ibm.com 2016-03-02 18:41 EDT--- I verified the problem is resolved w/ the package in -proposed on the QEMU guest scenario. Waiting on bug repoter's verification, then will mark verification-done. Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1540401] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-02-25 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mauri...@br.ibm.com 2016-02-25 12:18 EDT--- Hi @mathieu-tl, (In reply to comment #69) > It's on my list, yes. > > The idea however is that I haven't uploaded it because it is so annoying to > test these patches from a PPA, I uploaded the changes for xenial to the > archive

[Bug 1540401] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-02-23 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mauri...@br.ibm.com 2016-02-23 17:56 EDT--- Hi @mathieu-tl, Cool, thanks; glad to see the patch made Xenial. This is still on the queue for Trusty, correct? - there's no 'Affects' line for Trusty on the LP bug header yet. -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 1540401] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-02-22 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mauri...@br.ibm.com 2016-02-22 12:33 EDT--- *** Bug 129478 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- Comment From mauri...@br.ibm.com 2016-02-22 12:39 EDT--- *** Bug 131422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notific

[Bug 1540401] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-02-22 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mauri...@br.ibm.com 2016-02-22 12:30 EDT--- *** Bug 131024 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 1540401] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-02-18 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mauri...@br.ibm.com 2016-02-18 12:07 EDT--- *** Bug 137290 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 1540401] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-02-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mauri...@br.ibm.com 2016-02-04 16:52 EDT--- Hi @mathieu-tl (In reply to comment #44) > This isn't obvious to reproduce. So far, I haven't had the system fail to > boot or fail to mount all partitions. I have been testing *without* > multipath-tools 0.4.9-3ubuntu7.8; so not

[Bug 1540401] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-02-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mauri...@br.ibm.com 2016-02-04 13:36 EDT--- FYI. I've been testing reboots in the LPAR (biglp1, 14.04) with PATCH V2 for 20ish times now. All boots succeeded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mu

[Bug 1540401] Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

2016-02-04 Thread bugproxy
--- Comment From mauri...@br.ibm.com 2016-02-04 09:52 EDT--- (In reply to comment #38) > With those 2 fixes, the system boots correctly. > I'll build v2 packages. Available in http://ausgsa.ibm.com/~mauricfo/public/bugs/bz135869/v2 With those, the boot finishes successfully. I'll submit t