[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
Fixed in precise:
389-ds-base (1.2.10.2-0ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low
* Pull from unreleased debian branch. (LP: #27463)
389-ds-base (1.2.10.2-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
* New upstream release.
* watch: Fix the url.
* patches/remove_license_prompt: Dropped, included upstream.
* patches/default_user: Refreshed.
* control: Change the VCS header to point to the git repository.
* control: Rename last remnants of Fedora to 389.
* changelog, control: Be consistent with the naming; renamed the source
to just '389-ds-base', which matches upstream tarball naming.
* control: Wrap Depends.
* compat, control: Bump compat to 9, and debhelper build-dep to (= 9).
* rules: Switch to dh.
* Move dirsrv.lintian to dirsrv.lintian-overrides, adjust dirsrv.install.
* *.dirs: Clean up.
* control: Build-depend on dh-autoreconf, drop duplicate bdeps.
* Fold dirsrv-tools into the main package.
* Build against libldap2-dev (= 2.4.28).
* Rename binary package to 389-ds-base.
* -dev.install: Install the pkgconfig file.
* Add format-security.diff to fix FTBFS with current hardening flags.
* rules: Enable PIE hardening.
* Add a default file, currently sets LD_BIND_NOW=1.
* control: 'dbgen' uses old perl libs, add libperl4-corelibs-perl
dependency to 389-ds-base.
* rules: Add --fail-missing for dh_install, remove files not needed
and make sure to install the rest.
* rules, control: Fix the installation name of ds-logpipe.py, add
python dependency to 389-ds-base..
* libns-dshttpd is internal to the server, ship it in 389-ds-base.
* Rename libdirsrv{-dev,0} - 389-ds-base-{dev,libs}, includes only
libslapd and headers for external plugin development.
* control: Breaks/Replaces old libdirsrv-dev/libdirsrv0/dirsrv.
* Drop hyphen_used_as_minus, applied upstream.
* copyright: Use DEP5 format.
* Cherry-pick upstream commit ee320163c6 to get rid of unnecessary
and non-free MIB's from the tree, and build a dfsg compliant tarball.
* lintian-overrides: Update, create one for -libs.
* Fix the initscript to create the lockdir, and refactor code into separate
functions.
* Drop obsolete entries from copyright, and make it lintian clean.
* debian/po: Refer to the correct file after rename.
* control: Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3, no changes.
* postinst: Drop unused 'lastversion'.
* patches: Add DEP3 compliant headers.
389-directory-server (1.2.6.1-5) unstable; urgency=low
* Removed db_stop from dirsrv.postinst
* Fix short description in libdirsrv0-dbg
389-directory-server (1.2.6.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Make libicu dep dependent on dpkg-vendor
389-directory-server (1.2.6.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove dirsrv user and group in postrm
* Clean up postrm and postinst
389-directory-server (1.2.6.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix QUILT_STAMPFN
389-directory-server (1.2.6.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
389-directory-server (1.2.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Update my email address
389-directory-server (1.2.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
* s/Fedora/389/g to clean up the branding
* Remove automatic configuration (breaks too often with every update)
* Remove dirsrv.config translation, no questions are asked anymore
* Fix old changelog versions with proper ~ on rc versions
* Update policy to 3.9.1
* Improve README.Debian
* Depend on libicu44
* Remove /var/run/dirsrv from the postinst scripts (managed by init script)
389-directory-server (1.2.6~rc7-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
389-directory-server (1.2.6~a3-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
* Rename man page remove-ds.pl in remove-ds
* Removed Debian.source
389-directory-server (1.2.6~a2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
* Removed speling_fixes patch, applied upstream
389-directory-server (1.2.5-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream
* Add libpcre3-dev Build-dep
* ldap-agent moved ti /usr/sbin
* Fix spelling errors in code and manpages
* Fix some lintian warnings
* Bump policy to 3.8.3
* Ignore lintian warning pkg-has-shlibs-control-file-but-no-actual-shared-libs
as the shlibs file is for dirsrv plugins
* Upgraded deps to libicu42 and libdb4.8
* Do create /var/lib/dirsrv as dirsrv user's home
* Added libsasl2-modules-gssapi-mit as a dependency for dirsrv (needed by
mandatory LDAP SASL mechs)
* Install all files of etc/dirsrv/config
* Add some missing start scripts in usr/sbin
* Fixed a bug in the dirsrv.init script
* Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format
* Bump policy to 3.8.4
389-directory-server (1.2.1-0) unstable; urgency=low
* Rename of source package (note, since this is still staging work no
replace or upgrade is in place)
* Update watch file
* New Upstream
fedora-directory-server (1.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
* Add missing libkrb5-dev dependency
* Fix section of -dbg packages
* Fix all
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
We should package the LdapImport script from http://wiki.babel.com.au/index.php?area=Linux_Projectspage=LdapImport#toc1 as it is one of the Fedora recommended tools to migrate from other LDAP servers or /etc/passwd files. I've tested it importing from /etc/passwd|shadow|group and it works very well with 389. If it is already done, doh! If you want me to do it, let me know. Seems that in addition to the script files, the following are necessary: - libnet-ldap-perl, libnet-dns-perl, liblog-log4perl-perl, liblog-dispatch-perl ** Attachment added: LdapImport perl scripts https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/27463/+attachment/2808758/+files/LdapImport.tgz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 Title: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/27463/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/389-ds-base -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 Title: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/27463/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Opinion = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 Title: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/27463/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 Title: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
Why was the status of this bug changed to opinion? I though it was expected that changes of status were accompanied by a comment explaining why the change was made? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 Title: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
So I went ahead and set up some pbuilders for maverick (amd64 and i386). For anyone that is interested in testing the 389 Directory Server please add the following apt line to your sources.list: deb http://acksyn.org/ubuntu sid main To install the 389DS server just apt-get install dirsrv. To set it up run setup-ds Feedback, bug reports here http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg- fedora-ds-maintainers/ Work is proceeding on the admin server components (apt-get install dirsrv-admin; setup-ds-admin) and on the console (not done yet) -- [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
So things seem to have stalled somewhat? How about creating a collab-maint git repo on alioth.debian.org, and continue the packaging effort there? Upstream uses git now, and alioth is a better place for collaborating with Debian anyway (also because lp doesn't support git). -- [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
Yes they have; my efforts have been focused on the Trinity project lately. The packaging is still on revu for anyone to pull down and modify. -- [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
Apparently the packaging on the pkg-fedora-ds svn repo on alioth is quite fresh, but I bet Michele would certainly like some help getting them ready for inclusion. The repository also has packages for freeipa, but they're rather old and need to be updated to 1.9.0.pre3. -- [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
I just discovered https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FedoraDirectoryServer. There's a section entitled, Installation of Fedora Directory Server 1.1.x under Ubuntu 9.10. The version there seems old though, as the official version is now at 1.2.6.a2. -- [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
Any recent activity? It seems 389 didn't make it into Karmic, and the last builds were from June 2009. I see there's a new upstream release (1.2.5) and I may have a go at building .debs with the .dsc from the PPA. -- [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #497098 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=497098 ** Changed in: debian Importance: Undecided = Unknown ** Changed in: debian Status: New = Unknown ** Changed in: debian Remote watch: None = Debian Bug tracker #497098 -- [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
** Changed in: debian Status: Unknown = New -- [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
Rebuild test is failing due to bug 392104 -- [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu
** Summary changed: - [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu + [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu ** Description changed: It would be great if we could get native Ubuntu/Debian builds for - Fedora Directory Server, now that all the components of it are + 389 Directory Server, now that all the components of it are reported to be open sourced. - http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Main_Page + http://directory.fedoraproject.org/ Blair -- [needs-packaging] 389 Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
