Re: [Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 22:26 +, Timothy Pearson wrote: Hey, sorry for the lack of progress on this bug, but my servers were fried by a lightning-related EMP on Friday (June 19) and therefore I've been unable to do anything since then. ( more details are on a temporary website at http://apt.pearsoncomputing.net ) However, before that time, it was decided that at the very least the packages need to be renamed to reflect the change from Fedora directory server to 389 directory server. That is my top priority--once I can get at my servers again, that is!! Why have you never requested to work on the upstream debian packaging (i.e. me)? Having everyone working on his/her own package is such a waste of effort and time (be it debian or ubuntu). regards, Michele -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Hi Michele, I sent you an Email--hopefully I can help with your packaging. You're right, it does not make sense to be maintaining two separate versions. Thanks! Tim -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
I had a chat with David Sugar (I believe he is a staff member from Canonical). He suggests us to form a dedicated team to set up and maintain the 389 directory server. I have just done that and now we have got a new team called Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-389-directory-server I have added: Timothy Pearson (the Ubuntu packager) David Sugar (Canonical staff(?), also a REVU reviewer) Michele Baldessari (Debian 389 maintainer) to this team. Also this team now has a centralized ppa. So it would be nice if we can port Timothy's ppa to the team ppa, with the correct name changes etc. At the same time, Michele can make sure that this ppa compiles in the Debian testing suite and get 389 accepted in Debian as well. In this way, the team ppa will centralize the development of both Ubuntu and Debian port at once. I have just applied for an email list for this team and it is waiting for approval. David, would you be able to approve the team email list? Cheers, kcleung P.S. Apart from the package name changes, we should transfer the maintainer of the packages from Timothy Pearson to Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team so that this project is now managed by the whole team. Quoting Timothy Pearson kb9...@pearsoncomputing.net: Hi Michele, I sent you an Email--hopefully I can help with your packaging. You're right, it does not make sense to be maintaining two separate versions. Thanks! Tim -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
We have formed the Ubuntu 389 directory server team and this project now becomes team-managed ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: Timothy Pearson (kb9vqf) = Ubuntu 389 Directory Server Team (ubuntu-389-directory-server) -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
I am currently working with upstream Debian on this...hopefully things will progress rapidly now. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
I am going to fill the ppa with at least initial packages based on the original ones from Timothy starting tomorrow evening. At least it will let people test them. If we get this into Debian first, then it could get into Karmic as a merge request. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Sure! David, I'm currently running a build from the REVU packages in the PPA; if all goes well you shouldn't have to copy any of the Karmic packages and our versioning will end up being very similar to official. Tim -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Hey, sorry for the lack of progress on this bug, but my servers were fried by a lightning-related EMP on Friday (June 19) and therefore I've been unable to do anything since then. ( more details are on a temporary website at http://apt.pearsoncomputing.net ) However, before that time, it was decided that at the very least the packages need to be renamed to reflect the change from Fedora directory server to 389 directory server. That is my top priority--once I can get at my servers again, that is!! Tim -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Graeme: The reason why fedora-directory-server_1.2.0-2.dsc doesn't build on your jaunty system is because it relies on many libraries (such as libsvrcore-dev) which are also along Tim's upload. So you really need to test build these libraries first, then after they are built, include Tim's PPA: deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/kb9vqf/389directoryserver/ubuntu karmic main as an alternate source (OTHERMIRROR in .pbuilderrc) in your jaunty pbuilder environment. Don't worry, Grame, I've tried and it builds perfectly. I hope the REVU team can approve the packages as soon so possible so that it can get into Karmic Alpha 3 REVU: Would you please review the Fedora Directory Server packages as soon as possible so that it can get into Karmic Alpha 3? Ubuntu-Release: Our Fedora Directory Server packages are ready and it would be great to introduce Fedora Directory Server into Karmic. Sysadmins find FDS really helpful in managing resource accesses for large corporate networks -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Hey Kai-Cheung, Sorry I wasn't more explicit, but I *did* rebuild the required libraries from Tim's repo for jaunty. It still doesn't build properly for me. ;) I suspect that perhaps the build-deps on the packages aren't totally accurate, since I'm building on a fresh jaunty install inside a VM, and so I don't have any dev packages other than what apt-get build-dep pulls in. G -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
I will try to build the Jaunty packages ASAP, but first there is a potential REVU issue--they seem to want .orig.tar.gz files, and I need to go through and test build from original sources. That process might take some time, and I won't be able to get to the Jaunty packages until that is complete. The build-deps may not be 100% correct for the Intrepid packages, but Karmic should be pretty close. Remember that the PPA build systems start with a blank system and pull in the build-dep packages, so if it builds under Intrepid and Karmic that means that there is a different dependency somewhere that is only needed under Jaunty. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
I definitely agree about introducing into Karmic. That way there'll be some wider usage and testing before the next LTS. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Tim: Is it possible to get packages for jaunty into your repo? I'm getting errors trying to rebuild the packages on jaunty/amd64. It freaks out and generates a ton of errors trying to compile this: /bin/bash ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DBUILD_NUM=\2009.161.2056\ -I./ldap/include -I./ldap/servers/slapd -I./include -I. -DLOCALSTATEDIR=\/var\ -DSYSCONFDIR=\/etc\ -DLIBDIR=\/usr/lib\ -DBINDIR=\/usr/bin\ -DDATADIR=\/usr/share\ -DDOCDIR=\/usr/share/doc/dirsrv\ -DSBINDIR=\/usr/sbin\ -DPLUGINDIR=\/usr/lib/dirsrv/plugins\ -DTEMPLATEDIR=\/usr/share/dirsrv/data\ -I/usr/include/mozldap -I/usr/include/nspr -I/usr/include/nss -I/usr/include/nss -I/usr/include/nspr -I/usr/include/nspr -I/usr/include/sasl -I/usr/include -I/usr/include/nspr -I/usr/include/nss -Wall -pipe -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -MT ldap/servers/slapd/libslapd_la-add.lo -MD -MP -MF ldap/servers/slapd/.deps/libslapd_la-add.Tpo -c -o ldap/servers/slapd/libslapd_la-add.lo `test -f 'ldap/servers/slapd/add.c' || echo './'`ldap/servers/slapd/add.c -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu
Dear Ubuntu-server and Ubuntu-desktop: If you are also a REVU reviewer, would you please have a quick look at the new Fedora Directory Server package for ubuntu? Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/fedora-directory-server- inclusion The Fedora Directory server is the most advanced directory server in Linux. Its functionalty supersedes LDAP and makes the sysadmin's life much easier when managing computer resource / access for large networks. The absence of FDS in Ubuntu was (and still is) a major factor discouraging Ubuntu uptake. This package is sitting in REVU and needs urgent review in order to make it to 9.10 (Karmic). It is much better to introduce FDS in Karmic than directly to the next LTS! -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/27463 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a direct subscriber. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
