[Bug 372328] Re: Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3

2012-06-14 Thread James Page
More recent versions of Bacula are built with openssl support. Marking 'Fix Released' ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.

[Bug 372328] Re: Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3

2012-06-14 Thread Matthew Hooker
Can't remember recompiling for 10.04! Fix released ages ago.. Closing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372328 Title: Bacula has no encryption support in

[Bug 372328] Re: Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3

2009-10-04 Thread pablocosta
The last command in Ante's howto will build .deb packages and leave them on the parent directory, in this case besides the bacula-2.4.4 directory: u...@host:bacula-2.4.4$ ls -1 ../*.deb ../bacula_2.4.4-1ubuntu6_all.deb ../bacula-client_2.4.4-1ubuntu6_all.deb

[Bug 372328] Re: Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3

2009-05-07 Thread Matthew Hooker
openssl enabled packages build and install after following Ante Karamatić's instructions on i386 and amd64. -- Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 372328] Re: Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3

2009-05-06 Thread Matthew Hooker
Have tried to rebuild using instructions from here (as root) http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2/two-way-mirrors-of-external-mailing- lists-3/bacula-25/bacula-in-ubuntu-8-04-without-tls-91988/#283516 (some commands below changed as the new version of aptitude does not have 'Super Cow Powers'!)

[Bug 372328] Re: Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3

2009-05-06 Thread Ante Karamatić
@Matthew - since OpenSSL isn't GPL compatibile by definition we use, we can't distribute bacula with support for it. You are free to compile it by your self. How does building of source fail in your case @Kern - Bacula in Ubuntu is built with FORTIFY_SOURCE=0. ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu)

[Bug 372328] Re: Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3

2009-05-06 Thread Ante Karamatić
So, a brief HOWTO for building bacula with support for openssl in Ubuntu would be (example for Ubuntu 9.04): sudo apt-get build-dep bacula sudo apt-get install build-essential libssl-dev fakeroot devscripts apt-get source bacula cd bacula-2.4.4 (open debian/rules, find CONF_ALL and add

[Bug 372328] Re: Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3

2009-05-05 Thread Steven Susbauer
** Package changed: ubuntu = bacula (Ubuntu) -- Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 372328] Re: Bacula has no encryption support in bacula-sd-sqlite3

2009-05-05 Thread Steven Susbauer
I can confirm that SSL support is disabled as of bacula 2.2.0-1. It is documented in the NEWS.Debian and README.Debian, and their reason is at http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2007/07/msg00144.html It appears to be a licensing issue, and how Debian interprets the GPL (vs Red Hat and such