[Bug 412059] Re: MIR for vtun

2009-09-23 Thread Martin Pitt
** Changed in: vtun (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix

-- 
MIR for vtun
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vtun in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 412059] Re: MIR for vtun

2009-09-13 Thread Kees Cook
** Changed in: vtun (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Kees Cook (kees) = (unassigned)

-- 
MIR for vtun
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vtun in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 412059] Re: MIR for vtun

2009-08-20 Thread Jamie Strandboge
I have not performed a code review, but am familiar with the software. I
am extremely uncomfortable promoting this to main as is because of the
'encryption' support.
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/linux_vpn.txt has a good
summary. IMO if this were to be considered for main, we should
completely disable/remove the 'encryption' support, as well as remove
references to it in the documentation. I realize it has legitimate use
cases for pure (ie unencrypted) tunneling, but if we upload it as is,
it's easy to imagine someone saying 'oh, hey, it has encryption. let's
use it!' This needs to be avoided.

A much better solution would be to have upstream use proper, modern
tunneling software like openvpn. It can use preshared keys (among other
things) to make initial setup easier (which will allow for security-
concsious users to adjust as needed) and upstream can 'upgrade' to
proper TLS down the road.

-- 
MIR for vtun
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vtun in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 412059] Re: MIR for vtun

2009-08-20 Thread Kees Cook
I would agree with jdstrand -- this can't go into main.  It is flawed by
design.  A VPN without encryption means all the nodes between client and
server must be trusted (why not just route?).  -1.

** Changed in: vtun (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
MIR for vtun
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vtun in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 412059] Re: MIR for vtun

2009-08-18 Thread Loïc Minier
  * debian/patches/07-fix-gcc-warnings.patch: Fix gcc warnings.

Ouch that actually *hides* the warning, but doesn't handle the error
conditions at all

Thanks for the other changes, but I really think you should either
handle the error conditions or remove the patch altogether.

[ NB:
  * Clean up debian directory.
I'd personally not touch anything we dont need to touch in Ubuntu as it makes 
it harder to merge newer Debian versions; up to you though. ]

Will assign to Kees for security comments.

-- 
MIR for vtun
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vtun in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 412059] Re: MIR for vtun

2009-08-18 Thread Loïc Minier
Kees, what's your take on the security implications if we promote vtun
to main?  Thanks!

** Changed in: vtun (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Loïc Minier (lool) = Kees Cook (kees)

-- 
MIR for vtun
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vtun in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 412059] Re: MIR for vtun

2009-08-14 Thread Chuck Short
Chuck, you mention in the MIR that the software works out of the box but
the README.Debian and default config seems to imply that one needs to
setup vtun manually after install.

You are right that was a mistake.

Please implement the status action in the init script.

Done

FYI debian/rules isn't make -j safe:
clean: clean-patched unpatch

clean-patched should be listed in .PHONY.

Done

vtun should depend on ${misc:Depends}

Done

Could you explain how it is required to run eucalyptus? (I didn't it in
jaunty)

New features for Eucalyptus I dont have all the information yet, since
it is not released.

-- 
MIR for vtun
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vtun in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 412059] Re: MIR for vtun

2009-08-12 Thread Loïc Minier
Overall packaging looks good but it's quite scary to include this network 
service; it sounds like a light but less secure VPN.  For instance 
debian/README.Encryption says:
This program includes an encryption feature intended to protect the tunneled
data as it travels across the network. However, the protocol it uses is known
to be very insecure, and you should not rely on it to deter anyone but a casual
eavesdropper.

Chuck, you mention in the MIR that the software works out of the box but
the README.Debian and default config seems to imply that one needs to
setup vtun manually after install.

Please implement the status action in the init script.

FYI debian/rules isn't make -j safe:
clean: clean-patched unpatch

clean-patched should be listed in .PHONY.

vtun should depend on ${misc:Depends}

Could you explain how it is required to run eucalyptus?  (I didn't it in
jaunty)

I think I'll ask Kees for a security pass afterwards.

** Changed in: vtun (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Loïc Minier (lool)

-- 
MIR for vtun
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vtun in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 412059] Re: MIR for vtun

2009-08-12 Thread Loïc Minier
Hmm there are some compilation warnings such as not checking return
values; this is worrying for a root running vpn daemon

-- 
MIR for vtun
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412059
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vtun in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs