[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2010-01-25 Thread Chuck Short
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Chuck Short (zulcss) = (unassigned)

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Low = Medium

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Triaged

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Chuck Short (zulcss)

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2010-01-25 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck, you're thinking this is that Debian bug that had an advisory last
week right?

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2010-01-25 Thread Chuck Short
probably

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-11-25 Thread Chuck Short
@Joe,

have you tried the configuratoin change as suggested?

Thanks
chuck

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-11-25 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck Short wrote:
 @Joe,

 have you tried the configuratoin change as suggested?

 Thanks
 chuck

   
Hey Chuck, yea to the extreme I think it's at maybe 1 or 100 for 
MaxRequestsPerChild, but it seems to resemble the old bug on the 
surface. Either way it's quieted down for me, thanks for your attention 
to the issue.

-- 
Joe McDonagh
Operations Engineer
Silent Penguin Services
AIM: YoosingYoonickz 
IRC: joe-mac on freenode
www.colonfail.com

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-10-25 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck Short wrote:
 @Joe:

 Its marked Low so our qa scripts pick it up. Ill take a look at this
 again after karmic has been released.

 Regards
 chuck

   
Ah, ok, cool. Thanks Chuck.

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-10-23 Thread Chuck Short
@Joe:

Its marked Low so our qa scripts pick it up. Ill take a look at this
again after karmic has been released.

Regards
chuck

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-10-07 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck Short wrote:
 ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low

   

Chuck, was wondering, should this be marked Low from Undecided if it 
hasn't been confirmed nor denied by anyone?

-- 
Joe McDonagh
Operations Engineer
www.colonfail.com

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-10-06 Thread Chuck Short
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided = Low

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-28 Thread Joe McDonagh
Stefan, thanks for re-iterating the MaxRequestsPerChild tidbit, I had
forgotten that option was for lifetime, not concurrency. That'll
probably help workaround momentarily.

Also, I am not currently doing any tweaking wrt the SSLSessionCache, I
recall messing with it when I first started seeing this problem, but had
removed the configuration options since it didn't seem to help much.

I would just like to see some other pair of eyes confirm that a default
install with SSL still leaks. This is apparent because when I run the
same tests against the HTTP only port things look normal.

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-26 Thread Stefan Fritsch
  A workaround may be to add MaxRequestsPerChild 1000 (or an even lower
  value) to your configuration.
 
 
 That wouldn't really help since long-running children just hold onto
 memory no matter what it seems.

A lower MaxRequestsPerChild should make the children terminate earlier.

 Does the package information I put in the beginning look right?

I think so.

Do you use SSLSessionCache dbm? If yes, try switching to shmcb. I seem
to remeber a known memory leak in dbm.

You can also try if disabling mod_deflate helps.

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-24 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Is the parameter -f TLS1 necessary to reproduce the problem?

Is the URL / of your webserver a php page? If yes, why is the content
length of the page 0, what does the php script do? If not php, what is
it? A simple redirect?

A workaround may be to add MaxRequestsPerChild 1000 (or an even lower
value) to your configuration.

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-23 Thread Joe McDonagh
This took down a box today, had to visit the DC for it... is there any
more information-gathering I can do for you or myself here?

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-20 Thread Joe McDonagh
Chuck, is there anything else you need from me to promote this from
incomplete?

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-09 Thread Chuck Short
Interesting,

Can you specify the ab command that you used to reproduce this?

Thanks
chuck

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) = Chuck Short (zulcss)

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates

2009-09-09 Thread Joe McDonagh
Hey Chuck, thanks for the response. The command is:

ab -n 200 -c 100 -f TLS11 https://webserver/

At ten seconds:

30253 www-data  20   0  254m  75m 4432 S   31  0.5   0:03.50 apache2
30252 www-data  20   0  251m  72m 4464 S   30  0.4   0:03.34 apache2
30250 www-data  20   0  250m  70m 4420 S   29  0.4   0:03.26 apache2
30251 www-data  20   0  250m  70m 4448 S   29  0.4   0:03.28 apache2
30249 www-data  20   0  249m  70m  S   28  0.4   0:03.20 apache2
30331 www-data  20   0  244m  65m 4404 R   30  0.4   0:02.96 apache2
30369 www-data  20   0  233m  53m 4432 R   24  0.3   0:02.36 apache2
30410 www-data  20   0  231m  51m 4348 S   22  0.3   0:02.18 apache2
30458 www-data  20   0  224m  45m 4372 S   19  0.3   0:01.86 apache2
30506 www-data  20   0  217m  38m 4324 R   15  0.2   0:01.50 apache2
30557 www-data  20   0  212m  32m 4356 R   12  0.2   0:01.20 apache2
30620 www-data  20   0  207m  27m 4356 S9  0.2   0:00.92 apache2

This is a significant jump in memory allocation, and children get
spawned. I expect the children per my configuration, but the memory use
is obscene. At three minutes (stopped ab at this point)

30253 www-data  20   0  366m 187m 4636 S3  1.2   0:09.52 apache2
30252 www-data  20   0  364m 185m 4656 S3  1.2   0:09.46 apache2
30251 www-data  20   0  363m 184m 4668 S3  1.1   0:09.40 apache2
30250 www-data  20   0  361m 182m 4632 S3  1.1   0:09.30 apache2
30249 www-data  20   0  359m 179m 4676 S3  1.1   0:09.14 apache2
30331 www-data  20   0  355m 176m 4668 S3  1.1   0:08.94 apache2
30369 www-data  20   0  343m 164m 4636 S3  1.0   0:08.34 apache2
30410 www-data  20   0  343m 163m 4628 S3  1.0   0:08.26 apache2
30458 www-data  20   0  337m 158m 4684 S3  1.0   0:07.96 apache2
30557 www-data  20   0  320m 141m 4608 R3  0.9   0:07.08 apache2
30620 www-data  20   0  320m 140m 4676 S3  0.9   0:07.06 apache2
30675 www-data  20   0  315m 135m 4620 S3  0.8   0:06.74 apache2
30731 www-data  20   0  311m 131m 4624 S3  0.8   0:06.54 apache2
30841 www-data  20   0  300m 121m 4656 S3  0.8   0:05.96 apache2
30901 www-data  20   0  295m 116m 4608 S3  0.7   0:05.70 apache2
30957 www-data  20   0  294m 114m 4624 S3  0.7   0:05.62 apache2

Now ab is not running, but my stopwatch program is. Now at 5 minutes:

30458 www-data  20   0  341m 162m 4692 S0  1.0   0:08.16 apache2
31126 www-data  20   0  290m 111m 4596 S0  0.7   0:05.42 apache2
31112 www-data  20   0  288m 109m 4604 S0  0.7   0:05.30 apache2
31210 www-data  20   0  287m 108m 4612 S0  0.7   0:05.24 apache2
31257 www-data  20   0  287m 107m 4600 S0  0.7   0:05.24 apache2
31222 www-data  20   0  286m 107m 4636 S0  0.7   0:05.20 apache2
31410 www-data  20   0  285m 105m 4588 S0  0.7   0:05.10 apache2
31412 www-data  20   0  284m 105m 4656 S0  0.7   0:05.12 apache2
31396 www-data  20   0  284m 105m 4632 S0  0.7   0:05.12 apache2

Note that although some threads do disappear (normal, expect) the ones
that stay never free up any RAM. If I were to let this just chill by
itself for a few days, res would be a gig or so and virt would be up
there.

And for good measure, ten minutes:

30458 www-data  20   0  341m 162m 4692 S0  1.0   0:08.22 apache2
31126 www-data  20   0  291m 111m 4604 S0  0.7   0:05.48 apache2
31112 www-data  20   0  290m 110m 4620 S0  0.7   0:05.42 apache2
31222 www-data  20   0  288m 109m 4652 S0  0.7   0:05.34 apache2
31210 www-data  20   0  288m 109m 4616 S0  0.7   0:05.36 apache2
31257 www-data  20   0  287m 108m 4604 S0  0.7   0:05.30 apache2
31410 www-data  20   0  286m 107m 4604 S0  0.7   0:05.22 apache2
31396 www-data  20   0  286m 106m 4636 S0  0.7   0:05.24 apache2
31384 www-data  20   0  286m 106m 4616 S0  0.7   0:05.22 apache2
31412 www-data  20   0  285m 106m 4660 S0  0.7   0:05.18 apache2 

The server isn't being used much right now, but as you can see, no
memory has really been free'd. Right now I am working around this by
reloading apache at 11:59 every night (the saddest cron job on earth),
which appears to bring memory usage back down.

-- 
Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after 
-updates
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list