** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 463684
openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic
** Summary changed:
- karmic openldap cut-to-bone-and-beyond install, why
+ openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package
--
openldap install
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 463684 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684
Same for me. I don't think this is a documentation bug only.
** Tags added: regression-release
--
karmic openldap cut-to-bone-and-beyond install, why
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 463684 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684
Why is this marked as a duplicate of a documentation bug? There are
documentation issues here, to be sure, but this is also a useful
configuration missing by default bug, which isn't covered by #463684.
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 463684 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684
Please, provide a working default configuration with the common schemas
(inetOrgUser, sambaUser, maybe virtual mail domains).
Do we really need to argue the benefits an easy-to-install network LDAP
server?
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 463684 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 463684
openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic
--
karmic openldap cut-to-bone-and-beyond install, why
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:50:29AM -, Alberto wrote:
I am in the same boat. I had a perfectly working ldap setup with two
replicating servers on Jaunty. I made the stupid decision to upgrade to
Karmic and lo and behold the configuration broke! After a couple of days
of trying to find a
I am in the same boat. I had a perfectly working ldap setup with two
replicating servers on Jaunty. I made the stupid decision to upgrade to
Karmic and lo and behold the configuration broke! After a couple of days
of trying to find a solution to this problem, i looked at the files in
I've just written another HowTo that I'll gladly throw into the mix:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1313472
By the way: it is really a shame that there is no official word from
canonical on this. Not even an official tutorial on how to deal with the
new situation. It's nice that
Sorry for being very straight here (I'm german) but:
Yes there are people out there with no phd in programming (and not
planing to get one) that simlpy want to use openldap out of the box.
Install - setup - use!
I am new to ubuntu and I am trying to switch a productive environment
from windows
Alissa, thanks a ton. You are a life-saver.
I'm a Linux newbie and wanted to setup a sample ldap server to test. It took me
the whole of today to stumble upon Alissa's post to get something working.
I'd very much like OpenLDAP to work out of the box. And documentation to
support the version of
I am also having troubles with setting up OpenLDAP in Karmic. I
understand the recent changes are part of a bigger goal. However,
novice users like me desperately need some documentation on how to get a
simple directory database up and running. I have already put in a forum
message on this at
Sorry to say so,
this should be done before Karmic is released. After spending a lot of
time trying to configure openldap I downgraded the packages to the
Intrepid version to get a working test ldap on my machine.
Being able to run dpkg-reconfigure slapd and than having the first
choice being
The current plan is to stay with a bare-bone slapd package. A default
DIT (with associated modules and schema) should be provided as a
separate package, probably in the Lucid time frame.
--
karmic openldap cut-to-bone-and-beyond install, why
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498
You
Thanks for the bug report. I believe this might be considered for
karmic+1/
Regards
chuck
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
karmic openldap cut-to-bone-and-beyond install, why
14 matches
Mail list logo
