[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-11-13 Thread Olivier Le Merdy
This is great news to finally get OpenLdap back working smoothly in Ubuntu. Cannot wait to plug authentifications back on LDAP without fearing to break everything with an update. Any chance to get it soon on Maverick through maverick-backports? Bigs thanks for this work! -- openldap install

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-11-13 Thread Thag
Please can we get this in lucid as a backport since it's an LTS release? -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-11-13 Thread AlainKnaff
Seconded. Please provide a backport to lucid! -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu. --

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-11-12 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package openldap - 2.4.23-6ubuntu1 --- openldap (2.4.23-6ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low * Merge from Debian unstable: - Install a default DIT (LP: #442498). - Document cn=config in README file (LP: #370784). - remaining changes: + AppArmor

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-10-22 Thread Alfas
After every new release of ubuntu (the last I am trying now is 10.10) I try openldap. Unfortunately every time I end up with the same result. It does not work. I type in dpkg-reconfigure slapd and the result is the same as mentioned at the top of this bug report - no password asked configuration

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-10-22 Thread Graeme
Yeah, the fact that this isn't even being worked on since this problem was reported over a year ago is pretty embarrassing. It definitely seems like critical Ubuntu server issues are largely ignored. -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-05-17 Thread Adam Sommer
** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Adam Sommer (asommer) -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-23 Thread Thag
Can someone change this from wishlist to something more likely to get fixed? -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-20 Thread Thag
What is the functional state of openldap-dit? (https://launchpad.net /openldap-dit/) It hasn't seen any activity since 2009-12-02 and there are no milestones and no available downloads. The trunk show last modified 20 weeks ago. Is it functional, or the early stages of work in progress? The

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-14 Thread Thag
Apologies in advance for the useless rant, but whose idea was it to strip out the default ldap config? I second the comments of everyone here that laments the time when slapd just worked. The cn=config change was difficult to swallow, but in the interest of progress, OK, fine. This release

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-14 Thread Greg
This is not a documentation problem. It is a completely broken package problem. After spending ages troubleshooting a migration from a working LDAP config to a new LDAP instance on Karmic I gave up. I'm going to install a Windows DC and use likewise. Openldap is now my most hated piece of

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-14 Thread Thag
Just to get a feel for the state here, is there currently any work done at all for this slapd-dit package? Why is this marked as Won't fix? Is Ubuntu planning a new LTS release with no LDAP? That'll go over well. Has anyone in canonocal mgmt even seen this? Or is it a nasty little surprise

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-14 Thread Mathias Gug
I'd suggest to have a look at the openldap-dit project on LP: https://launchpad.net/openldap-dit/ -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-04-08 Thread Derek Simkowiak
In my opionion, the new (useless) slapd package should not have shipped until the accompanying slapd-dit was ready. It basically broke LDAP for everyone but experts, and now Mathias doesn't have time to fix it. Mathias, can you make slapd-dit a priority? It's been several months since a usable

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-03-23 Thread Tobias Bradtke
Is the package slapd-dit planed to be included in Lucid? Or will it at least be in the OpenLDAP Edgers PPA? Thanks! -- openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-03-23 Thread Mathias Gug
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:14:20PM -, Tobias Bradtke wrote: Is the package slapd-dit planed to be included in Lucid? It probably is too late for Lucid as FeatureFreeze is in effect. Or will it at least be in the OpenLDAP Edgers PPA? There isn't such a PPA AFAIK. However anyone can

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-03-19 Thread GoldDog
The lack of a simple way of setting up a working basic ldap-service is a serious problem. I've basically resigned to either using a really old package that's not broken in this way or just forgetting about ldap in ubuntu. What's the reasoning behind upgrading a package from too old to unusable ?

[Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-03-19 Thread Jürgen Erhard
And it also won't be fixed in any meaningful way in Lucid, or do I read that Declined for Lucid wrong? Really, I'm appalled. Last time I saw such a broken-as-installed package was in an ancient SuSE install. When you removed the DIT code from the package, why TF did you not roll a *simple*

Re: [Bug 442498] Re: openldap install bare bones need default DIT separate package

2010-03-19 Thread Mathias Gug
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 01:50:37PM -, Jürgen Erhard wrote: When you removed the DIT code from the package, why TF did you not roll a *simple* slapd-dit package (or whatever one would have called it)? That's the plan: creating a slapd-dit package that would provide the same DIT as before. I