[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2010-01-29 Thread Dustin Kirkland
** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- euca-authorize default failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. --

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-11-17 Thread Ubuntu QA Website
** Tags added: iso-testing -- euca-authorize default failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-11-13 Thread Thierry Carrez
Probably an issue in eucalyptus rather than euca2ools, since the same command works after issuing a group command (and no state is kept client-side) ** Changed in: euca2ools (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- euca-authorize default failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452556 You

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-11-13 Thread chris grzegorczyk
Actually, this bug has been closed a while ago and I can confirm it is not present in the current trunk. I'm afraid that it was closed incidentally and I don't know the revno, sorry. ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- euca-authorize default failing

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-29 Thread Thierry Carrez
** Tags added: eucalyptus -- euca-authorize default failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-22 Thread Thierry Carrez
Only first use error, I don't think it warrants a release note entry. ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Status: New = Invalid -- euca-authorize default failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-20 Thread Thierry Carrez
If systematic, we might need to document it in the release notes. ** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes Importance: Undecided Status: New -- euca-authorize default failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-18 Thread Daniel Nurmi
I looks like this bug happens when an authorize is called before the group is used in another context (run-instances, describe-group, etc). For example: euca-authorize (fails) euca-describe-groups euca-authorize (success) Attaching the log file showing exception, and exact commands **

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-16 Thread Nick Barcet
I am seeing this problem as well. Knowing where to collect debug info from would help. -- euca-authorize default failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. --

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-16 Thread Neil Soman
Please check the wire. I'd be interested in what the cloud is actually responding with (ngrep -d iface -Wbyline port 8773) on the front end. It is likely something to do with packaging. I have never seen it with the source install. -- euca-authorize default failing

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-16 Thread Nick Barcet
I have ran a capture of the traffic while the error is occuring: Request: CGET

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-16 Thread Neil Soman
Nick, do you have a server side exception/stack trace? Are there other exceptions? Something is definitely not right with the package. thanks. -- euca-authorize default failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-16 Thread Mathias Gug
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:56:26PM -, Neil Soman wrote: Nick, do you have a server side exception/stack trace? Are there other exceptions? Which file(s) should be looked at? Something is definitely not right with the package. Note that the error will disappear after some time and

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-16 Thread Nick Barcet
Unfortunately, the only report of an error on the server side is the one I got from capturing network traffic. As mathias pointed I cannot reproduce the error anymore... -- euca-authorize default failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452556 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-16 Thread chris grzegorczyk
** Changed in: eucalyptus Assignee: (unassigned) = chris grzegorczyk (chris-grze) ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- euca-authorize default failing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452556 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-16 Thread Nick Barcet
Perusing the /var/log/eucalyptus/cloud-output.log which seems to contain an interesting stack trace. Attaching the relevant section. ** Attachment added: stacktrace.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33802622/stacktrace.log ** Changed in: eucalyptus Status: Incomplete = Confirmed --

[Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-15 Thread Neil Soman
I am unable to reproduce this problem. I am using Eucalyptus revno 931 and Euca2ools revno 221. Perhaps something went wrong in the packaging? $ euca-authorize default -P tcp -p 22 -s 0.0.0.0/0 GROUP default PERMISSION default ALLOWS tcp 22 22 FROMCIDR 0.0.0.0/0 $

Re: [Bug 452556] Re: euca-authorize default failing

2009-10-15 Thread Mathias Gug
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:42:55PM -, Neil Soman wrote: I am unable to reproduce this problem. I am using Eucalyptus revno 931 and Euca2ools revno 221. I've seen that problem as well. But it's not reliably reproducible. After some time the command succeeds. If that happens again where can