[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2012-11-20 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: samba Importance: Critical = Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462172 Title: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use. To manage

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2011-02-04 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: samba Importance: Unknown = Critical -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462172 Title: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use. --

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-03-18 Thread Martin Pitt
** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. --

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-03-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package samba - 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.5 --- samba (2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.5) karmic-proposed; urgency=low * debian/patches/fix-libsmb-keepalive-packets.patch: Fix winbind authentication due to an invalid NTML2 signature. (LP: #479955)

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-03-17 Thread Besterino
I agree - after further testing I am back at the old transfer speeds, so most likely not related to the update. -- [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-03-16 Thread Martin Pitt
Don't know exactly what you mean with regression A regression is a bad behaviour which was introduced with this update and hasn't been present before. The data transfer rates you mention are pretty similar, though. They could also be influenced by other traffic in the network, other running

Re: [Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-02-19 Thread Martin Pitt
Thank you for testing! Besterino [2010-02-18 22:35 -]: One further observation (but don't know whether that is related to the new package) So the slowdown is not a regression then? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-02-19 Thread Besterino
@Martin: Don't know exactly what you mean with regression. Before installation of the patch transfer speed of the 2GB file started at approx. 119MB/sec and quickly dropped to approx 75-80MB/sec (and stayed there until the file is copied). With the patch copying of the 2GB file still starts at

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-02-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/samba -- [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-02-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic-proposed/samba -- [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-02-18 Thread Besterino
Had the same problem described above (copying folder with 77k files from windows 7 64Bit to ubuntu 9.10 server ended quickly in error message too many files open...). Installed the -proposed package manually (sudo aptitude install samba /karmik-proposed). After samba restart copying same folder

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-02-18 Thread Besterino
One further observation (but don't know whether that is related to the new package): The transfer speed drops dramatically after a while and is now down to 3.6-5MB/s (as shown in the details of the windows-copy- window) after approx 40.000 files (mostly small html files) have been copied. --

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-02-17 Thread Martin Pitt
Accepted samba into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Karmic)

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-02-05 Thread Chuck Short
** Summary changed: - samba Too many files are currently in use. + [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use. -- [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-02-05 Thread Chuck Short
Statement of Impact: Transfering several thousand files from Ubuntu to Windows 7 will fail with the Too many open files message resulting in the copying only half working. How this has been addressed: This has been fixed in lucid and upstream samba. I have verified that this has been fixed

[Bug 462172] Re: [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use.

2010-02-05 Thread John Dong
This patch looks reasonable to me and also compatibility with Win7 is definitely SRU-worthy for this minimally invasive fix. ACKing on behalf of ubuntu-sru -- proceed to upload to -proposed. -- [SRU] samba Too many files are currently in use. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462172 You received