Re: [Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small

2010-03-25 Thread Scott Moser
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Boris Devouge wrote: Agreed for Karmic. It was mainly filed to make sure we test the most common and rapid way to 'try' UEC which is to download and launch the 'default' image from the store, and run it in the default instance size. Is 192 meg a requisite for current

[Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small

2010-03-24 Thread Dustin Kirkland
I'm going to mark this won't-fix for now. I don't believe the Karmic images are going to be of primary value much longer. Surely people will bump up to 10.04 images soon. And we have now fixed the Lucid images to fit in 2G and set the default m1.small MEM to 192M, and tested that Lucid images

Re: [Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small

2010-03-24 Thread Boris Devouge
Agreed for Karmic. It was mainly filed to make sure we test the most common and rapid way to 'try' UEC which is to download and launch the 'default' image from the store, and run it in the default instance size. Is 192 meg a requisite for current uec lucid images? -- default karmic image from

[Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small

2010-03-23 Thread Scott Moser
using lucid server image 20100323, $ cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 802126848 sda 811441792 sda1 82 88000 sda2 83 597023 sda3 $ euca-describe-availability-zones verbose AVAILABILITYZONEUEC-TEST1 10.1.1.71

[Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small

2010-03-22 Thread Scott Moser
The plan here is to: a.) leave m1.small disk size at 2G. modify lucid filesystem image to be 1.4G in size. This will allow lucid images to fit into the 2G image and include the 512M of swap that is added to the image. The size units in Eucalyptus are in 1G units, keeping this at 2G rather than

[Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small

2010-03-22 Thread Scott Moser
see also bug 544292 -- default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529056 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small

2010-03-22 Thread Scott Moser
just for reference, a 'df' of a 2G lucid image looks like: $ df -h / FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda 2.0G 646M 1.3G 34% / So even moving the size to 1.4G you'd still get ~ 700M to work in. -- default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on

[Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small

2010-03-17 Thread Carlos de-Avillez
Indeed. Mathias and I just ran by the same error, and I went on and increased the disk size for m1.small from 2 to 3 G. I was then able to start the image. This was done on Lucid Eucalyptus, running the Karmic image from the store. -- default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default

[Bug 529056] Re: default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small

2010-03-03 Thread Mathias Gug
** Summary changed: - instances disk size needs to be bigger than filesystem size + default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default m1.small ** Changed in: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- default karmic image from image-store doesn't run on default