So, I set up sudoers and works great. But we have another problem thou.
I have put everything in the fstab. In Gnome if you go to Places you see
the mount point, but if you decide to go there it says Unable to mount
test2 (which is my mount point for the cifs). If I manually mount it,
obviously you
Does this mean other mount.X utils will be similarly affected?
Does the fstab man page now need to be updated to say that the 'user'
flag does not apply to cifs and possibly others?
--
mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805
You received this bug
setuid bit is set to /bin/mount and /sbin/mount.cifs:
sudo ls -la /bin/mount /sbin/mount.cifs
-rwsr-sr-x 1 root root 72188 2010-03-22 18:51 /bin/mount
-rwsr-sr-x 1 root root 30424 2010-04-09 17:29 /sbin/mount.cifs
but I got:
mount -t cifs //server/datenauf$ /mnt -o user,rw,user=bbr,dom=ivu-ag
mou
I disagree with Dietmar's comment #5, which says that 9.10 didn't
have the setuid bit.
Here is my Ubuntu 9.10:
r...@cst6:~# ls -la /bin/mount /sbin/mount.cifs
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 78096 2009-10-22 21:28 /bin/mount
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 36296 2010-03-22 15:27 /sbin/mount.cifs
Here is my U
Thierry, what about /bin/mount?
$ which mount | xargs ls -l
-rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 72188 2010-03-22 18:51 /bin/mount
it has the "setuid bit" set. Should "mount" and "mount.cifs" be treated
equally?
Previously, people could use "mount" without wondering if it was "sudo
mount.cifs" or just "
Setting the setuid bit on mount.cifs is discouraged upstream and opens
interesting security vulnerabilities:
smbfs (2:3.4.5~dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
* As of this version, the mount.cifs binary is no longer setuid.
Upstream has always been increasingly unsupportive of this
configurat
I think Dietmar's comment #5 is pretty interesting: the binaries in 9.10
did *NOT* have the suid-bit set, but it definitely worked for me back
then (and for others too, as they reported). So there must have been a
way to make this work. Have there been any of the mechanisms mentioned
by Wladimir in
Debian&Samba people say that's insecure to add setuid bit on these binaries,
and so this "fix" is discouraged.
Probably this could be resolved through some other security mechanism, like
PolicyKit or pmount ?
--
mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
For me on the Lenovo T410s with the desktop edition setuid fixed it.
However on the Asus EeePC 901 with the Netbook Edition is was not
necessary to set.
Just to mention.
--
mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805
You received this bug notificatio
Noticed this change this morning.
$ mount.smbfs -V
mount.cifs version: 1.12-3.4.7
$ smbclient -V
Version 3.4.7
Could it be related to this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571323
Though, it seems to indicate that setting a sticky bit just won't work.
However, I set the sticky b
Same here, setuid fixed it, thx.
Since I still have Ubuntu 9.10 on another partition I looked up the
permissions and found out that mount.cifs und umount.cifs have no setuid
bit set there and they are working without it (on Ubuntu 9.10).
--
mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set
http
Yeah got this issue too. Was mount.cifs suid in 9.10?
There's also a 'Mount FUSE filesystems' permission that can be set for
users through the GUI now. It made no difference though...
--
mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805
You received this b
the fix
sudo chmod +s `which mount.cifs`
sudo chmod +s `which umount.cifs`
--
mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
I too have run into this issue. 9.10 this was fine, 10.04 mount.cifs
requires the setuid bit before allowing users to do this w/o sudo
privileges. This may be a packaging regression?
--
mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805
You received this bug
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: samba
In 9.10 this worked fine:
dut...@vampire:~$ mount.cifs //dragon/dutchy ~/dragon/
Password:
In 10.04, i get:
dut...@vampire:~$ mount.cifs //dragon/dutchy dragon/
- Password:
+ Password:
mount error(1): Operation not permi
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
mount.cifs won't mount shares; set uid bit not set
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563805
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server T
** Attachment added: "CifsVersion.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44263109/CifsVersion.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44263110/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "SambaInstalledVersions.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44263111/SambaIns
17 matches
Mail list logo
