[Bug 575945] Re: [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages

2010-07-01 Thread Martin Pitt
According to the bug trail this is fixed in jaunty and above. ** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575945 You received this bug

[Bug 575945] Re: [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages

2010-07-01 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package chkrootkit - 0.47-1.1ubuntu0.3 --- chkrootkit (0.47-1.1ubuntu0.3) hardy-proposed; urgency=low * debian/chkrootkit.1: Added -e option to manpage, as suggested by SRU verification. (LP: #575945) -- Marc Deslauriers marc.deslauri...@ubuntu.com

[Bug 575945] Re: [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages

2010-06-25 Thread Martin Pitt
Version 0.47-1.1ubuntu0.3 accepted into hardy-proposed which adds the manpage option. Please check and report back here. Thanks! -- [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575945 You received this bug notification

[Bug 575945] Re: [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages

2010-06-25 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Verification-done in hardy with 0.47-1.1ubuntu0.3 in -proposed. Many thanks for the update Marc. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575945

[Bug 575945] Re: [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages

2010-06-23 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
SRU Verification Hardy I've verified that the version 0.47-1.1ubuntu0.2 in -proposed ignores files in the exclusion list with the -e option. My only concern is a documentation issue because the new option is not documented in the manpage. Could you please update it too ? 2 other comments but

[Bug 575945] Re: [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages

2010-06-23 Thread Jean-Baptiste Lallement
Bug 597623 filed for the last 2 points. -- [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to chkrootkit in ubuntu.

[Bug 575945] Re: [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages

2010-06-23 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Thanks for the verification Jean-Baptiste. I have uploaded 0.47-1.1ubuntu0.3 to -proposed with the suggested manpage change. -- [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575945 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 575945] Re: [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages

2010-06-18 Thread Colin Watson
Accepted chkrootkit into hardy-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance! ** Changed in: chkrootkit (Ubuntu

[Bug 575945] Re: [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages

2010-06-18 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/hardy-proposed/chkrootkit -- [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575945 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 575945] Re: [SRU] chkrootkit falsely flags files owned by Firefox 3 and Sun Java 6 valid packages

2010-06-09 Thread Marc Deslauriers
SRU Request: Impact: chkrootkit tool reports false positives in hardy, and the option to ignore certain known false positives is only present in later versions. This impacts the usefulness of the tool. This has been addressed by backporting the -e option from the newer release to let