** Changed in: eucalyptus
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588410
Title:
dynamic block storage should use virtio
To manage
** Changed in: eucalyptus
Assignee: (unassigned) = Ye Wen (wenye)
--
dynamic block storage should use virtio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.
--
This bug was fixed in the package eucalyptus - 1.6.2+bzr1230-0ubuntu3
---
eucalyptus (1.6.2+bzr1230-0ubuntu3) maverick; urgency=low
* debian/eucalyptus-java-common.links: Changed symlink for groovy, point to
groovy.all.jar, making compatiable with groovy versions 1.7. (LP:
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/eucalyptus
--
dynamic block storage should use virtio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
** Branch linked: lp:~davewalker/ubuntu/maverick/eucalyptus/devel
--
dynamic block storage should use virtio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.
--
Maverick has libvirt 0.8.1 now, so support for dynamically attaching of
scsi devices is deprecated.
--
dynamic block storage should use virtio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Jamie Strandboge ja...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Maverick has libvirt 0.8.1 now, so support for dynamically attaching of
scsi devices is deprecated.
Right, as Jamie says, any distro that includes libvirt = 0.8.1 will
not work with scsi for hot attach. If upstream
Yes, I understand. I was replying to this part: As an added benefit,
performance should increase significantly. This is not necessarily
true, and in some cases, we have seen 10% performance degradation by
moving to virtio.
It will be a while until all distros move to libvirt 0.8.1. From an
** Tags added: patch
--
dynamic block storage should use virtio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Just as a warning, we have seen cases where enabling virtio for disks
actually degrades performance when compared to scsi for dynamically
attached disks. We will be enabling virtio for the next release, but it
important (from the upstream's point of view) that it be an option.
--
dynamic block
** Branch linked: lp:~davewalker/ubuntu/maverick/eucalyptus/maverick_1.7
--
dynamic block storage should use virtio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588410
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu.
--
Dave,
Could you go ahead an prepare a Eucalyptus upload for Maverick with this
patch, and ask for sponsorship? Scott or I should be able to help with
that.
Thanks.
--
dynamic block storage should use virtio
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588410
You received this bug notification because you
Dustin et al,
Just FYI, we're definitely adding virtio support, for both network and
disk, in the next release (Ye is working on it right now). It will be an
option that can be turned on by default on Ubuntu.
Dmitrii
--
dynamic block storage should use virtio
I'm attaching a patch that I tested, which generally seems to work. ebs
attached volumes are then attached as virtio devices.
** Patch added: patch for using virtio for ebs devices
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49623427/ebs-virtio-debdiff.diff
--
dynamic block storage should use virtio
14 matches
Mail list logo
