[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-08-06 Thread Thierry Carrez
Fixed in development release, targeting to lucid as well. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Released ** Also affects: apache2 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Lucid) Importance: Undecided = High --

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-08-06 Thread Chuck Short
Status of Impact: Lucid was shipped with a bug in apache that will have hundreds of client sent HTTP/1.1 request without a hostname. This has been fixed in apache 2.2.16 and have been backported to lucid. How to reproduce: 1. Install apache with mod_ssl. 2. Watch your logs fill up with the

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-08-06 Thread Chuck Short
** Patch added: apache.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53182798/apache.debdiff ** Summary changed: - client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) + [SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) -- [SRU] client sent

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-07-29 Thread Jiří Engelthaler
Yes it should not be marked as fixed. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = In Progress -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-07-29 Thread Joe McDonagh
Just to chime in, this is affecting my 10.04 LTS nodes talking to my recently upgraded 10.04 LTS puppet master. Puppet sits behind Apache with mod_proxy_balancer and mod_ssl. I disabled reqtimeout and have yet to see this re-appear. -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-07-28 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
2.2.16-1ubuntu1 is not in lucid -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-07-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package apache2 - 2.2.16-1ubuntu1 --- apache2 (2.2.16-1ubuntu1) maverick; urgency=low * Merge from debian unstable. Remaining changes: - debian/{control, rules}: Enable PIE hardening. - debian/{control, rules, apache2.2-common.ufw.profile}: Add

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-07-26 Thread Christopher Chan
Looks like that apache/mod_ssl fix is only in the httpd trunk, doesnt seem like it's made it into the 2.2 branch even though the fix is 2 yrs old. What's the plan for putting into the Ubuntu's apache distro? -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-07-26 Thread Jiří Engelthaler
It's scheduled (apache) to backport this fix to 2.2.x branch http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?revision=979087view=markup Quick fix is to uninstall optimized libc library libc6-i686. -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-07-24 Thread Stefan Fritsch
I think Jiří found the source of the problem, but it is a mod_ssl bug after all. Reassigning to apache2. This would be https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444 ** Bug watch added: Apache Software Foundation Bugzilla #45444

Re: [Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-28 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de: But the bug disappears if I do mv /lib/i686 /lib/disabled_i686 I will try to reproduce this here There was a bug recently in Debian related to some gcc versions creating wrong code for SSE4. Maybe that is the problem here, too. What CPUs do you

Re: [Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-28 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de: This is a rather strange bug: - It happens if I enable exactly two out of the three modules deflate, reqtimeout, dump_io. But not with only one or all three of them. - I have also tried replacing mod_ssl.so, mod_deflate.so, and the openssl-libs with the

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-27 Thread c_t
mod_reqtimeout could be a reason, since it has been activated according to apt-listchanges: apache2 (2.2.15-1) unstable; urgency=low * This release adds and enables mod_reqtimeout, which limits the time Apache waits for a client to send a complete request. This helps to mitigate against

Re: [Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-27 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de: I suspect this is the same issue as bug #595855 and #595116: Headers are getting truncated with https. So far, I have no idea about the reason. If you have mod_reqtimeout and/or mod_deflate enabled, you can try if disabling one or both of them makes any

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-27 Thread Stefan Fritsch
This is a rather strange bug: - It happens if I enable exactly two out of the three modules deflate, reqtimeout, dump_io. But not with only one or all three of them. - I have also tried replacing mod_ssl.so, mod_deflate.so, and the openssl-libs with the versions from karmic and mod_ssl.so with

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-27 Thread Stefan Fritsch
Actually, I have reproduced bug #595116 and not this one, but I still think it's the same. -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-26 Thread c_t
Any news on this subject? I'm experiencing the same issue since the upgrade on ubuntu 10.04. I have seen Bad Request-error pages in Safari 4 and 5 and in the error-log I get client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname errors for the corresponding requests. It is however not reproducible, after

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-26 Thread Stefan Fritsch
I suspect this is the same issue as bug #595855 and #595116: Headers are getting truncated with https. So far, I have no idea about the reason. If you have mod_reqtimeout and/or mod_deflate enabled, you can try if disabling one or both of them makes any difference. -- client sent HTTP/1.1

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-09 Thread Thierry Carrez
It's definitely a client-side issue, however before your upgrade your Apache configuration would just accept those broken requests without error. In particular, IE6/7 are knows for broken HTTP/1.1 handling. I wonder what changes you applied to your Apache configuration. In particular, did you use

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-09 Thread Thierry Carrez
Also could you trace the Browser(s) used on those failing requests, see if we have a pattern there ? -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

Re: [Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-09 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Thierry Carrez thierry.car...@ubuntu.com: It's definitely a client-side issue, however before your upgrade your Apache configuration would just accept those broken requests without error. In particular, IE6/7 are knows for broken HTTP/1.1 handling. I wonder what changes you applied to your

Re: [Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-09 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Thierry Carrez thierry.car...@ubuntu.com: Also could you trace the Browser(s) used on those failing requests, see if we have a pattern there ? I have no access to the clients. -- Ralf Hildebrandt Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-09 Thread Thierry Carrez
You have no access to the client, but you can trace in the server logs the UserAgent field as sent by the clients. -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-04 Thread Stephan Hermann
Ralf, but the client sends the http request headers with an empty Hostname: header or did I miss something, if Hostname header is not set it's http/1.0 ... I wonder if it's a client problem Regards, \sh -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)

2010-06-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Before update: no occurences * After update: Thousands of occurences Hmm, and this with the same set of 18.000 users. I already checked if it's one special type of client, but that is not the case. I'm seeing this form IE, from Safari, from Windows, from Mac. It's a regression of some kind.