[Bug 614320] Re: bacula awk script for sqlite catalog backup broken

2012-02-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package bacula - 5.2.5-0ubuntu3 --- bacula (5.2.5-0ubuntu3) precise; urgency=low * fix db-common configuration of database name (LP: #830108) [ David Stenglein ] * improve make_catalog_backup_awk in sqlite3 to dump catalog only once rather than

[Bug 614320] Re: bacula awk script for sqlite catalog backup broken

2012-02-10 Thread Scott Moser
given this file is in debian/ making upstream bug as invalid. ** Changed in: bacula Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614320 Title: bacula

[Bug 614320] Re: bacula awk script for sqlite catalog backup broken

2010-08-06 Thread Clint Byrum
** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: bacula (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- bacula awk script for sqlite catalog backup broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server

[Bug 614320] Re: bacula awk script for sqlite catalog backup broken

2010-08-06 Thread Clint Byrum
Confirmed that the script is doing the wrong thing, and the proposed fix is the right way to go. Marking Importance Low because, while it does waste a lot of time and system resources, it still works, just not very well. -- bacula awk script for sqlite catalog backup broken

[Bug 614320] Re: bacula awk script for sqlite catalog backup broken

2010-08-06 Thread Clint Byrum
Oh, and I almost forgot, David, thank you for reporting this bug and working with us to make Ubuntu better! -- bacula awk script for sqlite catalog backup broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 614320] Re: bacula awk script for sqlite catalog backup broken

2010-08-06 Thread David Stenglein
You're welcome. Amusingly enough, right after posting this bug I've switched to using mysql. I'm running bacula on a single machine and using sqlite causes huge problems with the way it handles synchronous writes when there are a large number of files to be scanned for backup. Glad I could catch