[Bug 666180] Re: KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386 10.04 minimal sever images

2010-10-28 Thread Harald Hannelius
This seems much like my problem. If I boot the previous kernel 2.6.32-24 from everything works OK. This makes me suspect that the problems is within the kernel, did Maverick drop i386 or i686 support or something? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/663191 -- KVM does not boot

Re: [Bug 666180] Re: KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386 10.04 minimal sever images

2010-10-28 Thread con
I had a boot problem with maveric, too. My solution was to add the apparmor sevurity rules in virt-manager. Now it works again. Am 28.10.2010 11:41 schrieb Harald Hannelius 666...@bugs.launchpad.net: This seems much like my problem. If I boot the previous kernel 2.6.32-24 from everything works

[Bug 666180] Re: KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386 10.04 minimal sever images

2010-10-26 Thread SqUe
I have no x86-64 setup on any pc and I am out of time to experiment right now. I should notice here that apart from the old one misbehaving image, to reproduce it is as easy as making a fresh 10.04.1 i386 MINIMAL installation through libvirt or by directly using kvm with command line. After the

Re: [Bug 666180] Re: KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386 10.04 minimal sever images

2010-10-26 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting SqUe (666...@bugs.launchpad.net): I have no x86-64 setup on any pc and I am out of time to experiment right now. I should notice here that apart from the old one misbehaving image, to reproduce it is as easy as making a fresh 10.04.1 i386 MINIMAL installation through libvirt or by

[Bug 666180] Re: KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386 10.04 minimal sever images

2010-10-25 Thread SqUe
** Description changed: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm After upgrade from 10.04 - 10.10 all the libvirt domains did not boot and the cpu usage went 100%. Trying to isolate the problem I found that kvm on maverick is unable to boot ubuntu 10.04 i386 virtual minimal - setup. I even moved