To find some way to get MAAS to wait longer, I I initially looked in
/usr/share/pyshared/cobbler/modules/sync_post_restart_services.py and
found code that looks like it uses subprocess_sp() from
/usr/share/pyshared/cobbler/utils.py to run service dnsmasq restart.
Perhaps the code for restarting
Public bug reported:
standard update package
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: libsasl2-2 2.1.25.dfsg1-3ubuntu0.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001113
Title:
package libsasl2-2 2.1.25.dfsg1-3ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade:
libsasl2-2:amd64 2.1.25.dfsg1-3ubuntu0.1
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001113
Title:
package libsasl2-2 2.1.25.dfsg1-3ubuntu0.1 failed to install/upgrade:
Hello Seb, or anyone else affected,
Accepted samba into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
**
Hello James, or anyone else affected,
Accepted samba into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
Hello Matt, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libgcrypt11 into precise-proposed. The package will build now
and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
Hello Matt, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libgcrypt11 into oneiric-proposed. The package will build now
and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
Hello Matt, or anyone else affected,
Accepted libgcrypt11 into natty-proposed. The package will build now and
be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in
Hello Jacob, or anyone else affected,
Accepted drbd8 into lucid-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
**
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/drbd8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to drbd8 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000355
Title:
[SRU] drbd fence-peer breaks when using kernel 2.6.32-41
To manage
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/samba
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/999764
Title:
[SRU] no ufw profile or apport hook is included in the 12.04 packages
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/samba
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970679
Title:
[SRU] winbind coredumps when encountering a group with over 1000
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/libgcrypt11
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/oneiric-proposed/libgcrypt11
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/natty-proposed/libgcrypt11
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in
Public bug reported:
can not run correctly
can not remove
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: tftpd-hpa 5.2-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic-pae 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to tftp-hpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001173
Title:
package tftpd-hpa 5.2-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation
Our current hypothesis for how this situation happened in the first
place is that because nova-api returns success early, it's possible to
run the attach before the volume has actually been successfully created.
It looks like the attach needs to block internally to wait for the
volume creation to
I did not change /etc/default/lxc.
On 05/17/2012 02:56 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Robert Blenis (1000...@bugs.launchpad.net):
rblenis@rblenis-laptop:/etc/init$ sudo stop lxc-net
stop: Unknown instance:
rblenis@rblenis-laptop:/etc/init$ sudo start lxc-net
start: Job failed to start
Hello, Martin.
Any chance of getting that for lucid?
Thank you in advance!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252
Title:
NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid
Yes, it looks very much like the DNS system is broken here, but when I
tried to look things up I get Bug #1001189 so overall not impressed with
12.04 so far :(
Still, adding some dns-nameservers lines to /etc/network/interfaces is
the next obvious thing to try.
--
You received this bug
Yes, it'll be SRUed for lucid too, I'm just waiting for Adam to finish
preparing the debdiff and I'll review and upload it to lucid-proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.
Perplexing.
Please do so, to make sure you don't get future failures with 'start
lxc' on boot or package upgrades. I'll mark this bug fix released for
now, but if and when you start looking into using lxc and want to debug
it, please feel free to reply and re-open this bug.
** Changed in: lxc
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:
Work items set to:
Work items:
Write up policy for cloud archive: TODO
Write up process for cloud archvie: TODO
Create related packaging branches: TODO
Create openstack-ci infrastructure: TODO
Liase with canonical-is to create cloud-archive for precise-folsom:
Might be a repeat of https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6724
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #6724
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6724
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug in Ubuntu.
It would be great if one or more of the reporters of this bug could try
to grab a backtrace from smbd when it hits this issue.
Details on how todo this can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingProgramCrash
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:
Whiteboard set to:
UDS Discussion points:
Welcome to Ubuntu Developer Summit!
#uds-p #track #topic
'The Cloud Archive'
- NOT PPA's
- Personal and not of release quality with 'unknown' controls.
- NOT backports
- Only single version can be supported at a time
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:
Whiteboard changed:
UDS Discussion points:
Welcome to Ubuntu Developer Summit!
#uds-p #track #topic
'The Cloud Archive'
- NOT PPA's
- - Personal and not of release quality with 'unknown' controls.
+ - Personal and not of release quality with
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:
Definition Status: Discussion = Review
--
Ubuntu Cloud Archive
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-cloud-archive
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Yesterday after reboot neither smbd, nor nmbd started. There was nothing
in logs. Ubuntu server is such a failure.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596064
Title:
nmbd
After another reboot, smbd started, nmbd didn't, but this time there was
a message in log:
May 18 18:27:37 shadow-server init: nmbd pre-start process (882)
terminated with status 1
After one more reboot both smbd and nmbd startd. Can someone finally fix
this? Can this god damn init be more
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:
Work items changed:
Work items:
Write up policy for cloud archive: TODO
Write up process for cloud archvie: TODO
Create related packaging branches: TODO
+ Write upgrade tests for Openstack: TODO
Create openstack-ci infrastructure: TODO
Liase with
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:
Whiteboard changed:
UDS Discussion points:
Welcome to Ubuntu Developer Summit!
#uds-p #track #topic
'The Cloud Archive'
- NOT PPA's
- Personal and not of release quality with 'unknown' controls.
- NOT backports
- Only single version can be
Script essentially is giving me a counter to watch the rate of commits
on a subversion repository:
mheldebr@server:~$ /svn-hotcopy/svnyoungest
10386
I tried both exec (works on RHEL5 configured like this) and extend which
both fail:
Snippet of snmpd.conf file with exec style:
exec
This may help if you have this issue with ypbind trying to start and the
network not up yet:
Use IP addreses in /etc/yp.conf
for example:
domain your_nis_domain server 10.10.123.123
If the network is not up, ypbind starts and cannot reslove the hostname in
yp.conf and dies.
If you supply an
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:
Work items set to:
Work items:
Package nova for folsom: TODO
Package swift for folsom: TODO
Package horizon for folsom: TODO
Package keystone for folsom: TODO
Package glance for folsom: TODO
Package quantum for folsom: TODO
Package python-glanceclient: TODO
MIR
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:
Whiteboard changed:
+ UDS Discussion Points:
+
+ #uds-q #servercloud #openstack-folsom
Etherpad: http://pad.ubuntu.com/uds-q-servercloud-q-openstack-folsom
Blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-folsom
-
+ * Nova
+
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:
Whiteboard changed:
UDS Discussion Points:
#uds-q #servercloud #openstack-folsom
Etherpad: http://pad.ubuntu.com/uds-q-servercloud-q-openstack-folsom
Blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-openstack-folsom
* Nova
-
Blueprint changed by Chuck Short:
Work items set to:
Work items:
Formalize Openstack SRU policy for Precise: TODO
Prepare ubuntu packaging branches for stable: TODO
Prepare upstream tarballs for essex/stable branches: TODO
Prepare openstack-ci for testing of essex/stable: TODO
Week 5 Monitor
I think this bug should concentrate on the key issue: that ntp (and
maybe others?) is being brought up on the wrong event, that is it comes
up with the interface, and not with the chosen type of name server.
In our case NIS provides user and name server resolution, and ntp comes
up before it with
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 19:33:37 -, Paul Crawford wrote:
domain, I think). I don't really understand NIS, and the
guy usually responsible for this sort of thing is away,
but as far as I know it only provides local-area
user/machine authentication and so I would be surprised
if it 'knows'
Public bug reported:
Error 126
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
AptOrdering:
samba: Install
samba: Configure
Architecture:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001420
Title:
package samba 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:
Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den
Blueprint changed by Stéphane Graber:
Work items changed:
Work items:
- [stgraber] Review list of extra packages in lxc-ubuntu and have it contain
the right list for each release: TODO
+ [stgraber] Review list of extra packages in lxc-ubuntu and have it contain
the right list for each
Blueprint changed by Stéphane Graber:
Definition Status: Discussion = Pending Approval
--
Lxc work for Q
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-lxc
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
Yes, you are right in that our NIS servers are solaris boxes, and they
do support behind-the-scenes DNS lookups as it turns out. It is also
true that NIS is depreciated, though a lot of older installations like
ours still use it, and for most machines DNS is available and will
probably fix our
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 17:47:21 -, Paul Crawford wrote:
I think this bug should concentrate on the key issue:
that ntp (and maybe others?) is being brought up on the
wrong event, that is it comes up with the interface, and
not with the chosen type of name server.
More specifically, the
I'm not sure off hand how the decision is made whether to
convert a package such as ntp to Upstart... but I see a
couple other bugs open on the topic: LP #604717 , LP #913379
Sorry, should have written those bug references as: LP: #604717 , LP:
#913379
--
You received this bug notification
This has taken me longer than it should have because I made some bad
initial assumptions.
The appearance of a /dev/shm directory was a bit of a false flag. That
was happening because the chroot case higher in initscripts.postinst was
failing to create the /dev/shm symbolic link in the first
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 604717 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604717
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 604717
Please convert init script to upstart
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to
Per irc discussion with slangasek, further patching is needed to make
sure that the /run/lock and /run-/var/run update works right in an
upgrade with /run transition.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
I can confirm Serge's analysis here. I'm surprised that this hasn't
bitten us more severely before now, given that I see all my compat
symlinks are wrong in my (iteratively upgraded) precise chroots here;
apparently things really don't care so much about the compat these days.
We should
Blueprint changed by Stéphane Graber:
Work items changed:
Work items:
- [stgraber] Review list of extra packages in lxc-ubuntu and have it contain
the right list for each release: INPROGRESS
+ [stgraber] Review list of extra packages in lxc-ubuntu and have it contain
the right list for each
This bug was fixed in the package lxc - 0.8.0~rc1-4ubuntu8
---
lxc (0.8.0~rc1-4ubuntu8) quantal; urgency=low
* Update lxc-ubuntu:
- Update list of extra packages for debootstrap to only include vim
and ssh. The others were only relevant when we were still using the
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lxc
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996839
Title:
conflict between inetutils-ping and iputils-ping during bootstrapping
phase
To manage
** Tags added: patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974584
Title:
Semaphores cannot be created in lxc container
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
apt-get install failed at last
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: lxc 0.7.5-3ubuntu54
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7
Architecture:
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001513
Title:
package lxc 0.7.5-3ubuntu54 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001513
Title:
package lxc 0.7.5-3ubuntu54 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980712
how to solve it??
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980712
Title:
Package winbind 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-removal
i mean :
winbind
libpam-winbind
Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980712
Title:
Package winbind 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu1
hi guys!i need your help, can anybody solve this?
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of winbind:
winbind depends on libwbclient0 (= 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1); however:
Version of libwbclient0 on system is 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.2.
winbind depends on samba-common (= 2:3.6.3-2ubuntu2.1);
62 matches
Mail list logo
