Public bug reported:
nova-cert and nova-doc short descriptions should be fixed:
* nova-cert: s/virtual machine scheduler/certificate management/
* nova-doc: s/documetation/documentation/
** Affects: nova (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification
See #916773 for the explanation of why the conflict was added.
Essex 4 shouldn't cause any more problem, so the packaging can be fixed.
** Also affects: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
--ephemeral_gb=0
[...]
test created
** Affects: nova
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Adrien Cunin (adri2000)
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043410
(Sorry I filed this against ubuntu/nova instead of nova.)
** Package changed: nova (Ubuntu) = nova
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1043410
Title:
nova-manage create
Why do we keep horizon and keystone tasks?
By the way, I think it's possible to mitigate this issue in Keystone
using Apache. See http://adam.younglogic.com/2012/04/keystone-httpd/ to
set it up and be able to use https:// for Keystone.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Also affects: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: keystone (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Adrien Cunin (adri2000)
** Changed in: python-keystoneclient (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Adrien Cunin (adri2000)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
Chuck,
According to
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/hardy/+queue?queue_state=4queue_text=fail2ban,
your upload was rejected on 2008-09-03. Please sort it out and re-upload. If
you cannot take care of that reasonably quickly (the sru process started more
than 3 months ago!), please tell us so that
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
I encountered this bug on a hardy domain controller using winbind to
fetch user/group informations from another NT domain (the Samba domain
trusts the NT domain). Calling getent group just crashes winbindd, as
seen in the log attached.
This is a
** Attachment added: winbindd-crash.log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22567931/winbindd-crash.log
** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #5906
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5906
** Also affects: samba via
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5906
Importance: Unknown
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
Assignee: (unassigned) = Adrien Cunin (adri2000)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
getent group crashes winbindd on domain
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: samba
I encountered this bug on a hardy domain controller using winbind to
fetch user/group informations from another NT domain (the Samba domain
trusts the NT domain). Calling getent group just crashes winbindd, as
seen in the log
Steve, can you merge the latest version from unstable into jaunty before
Thursday?
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Jaunty)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon)
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
getent group crashes winbindd on domain
Needs to be uploaded by ubuntu-main-sponsors and ACKed by ubuntu-sru,
once the bug is fixed in jaunty.
** Attachment added: hardy debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22706088/samba_3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.8.debdiff
--
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
Could the SRU Verification team take a look at this bug please?
--
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Martin, I cannot test the packages in -proposed because I don't have
anymore access to the domain controllers where I encountered the bug,
but when I had such access, I built and tested my own packages including
exactly the same patch with a successful result, and I know the domain
controllers
What can be done in such a situation? Isn't the SRU Verification team
supposed to test the packages?
--
getent group crashes winbindd on domain controller
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328874
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed
Sorry to be repeating myself, but isn't the SRU Verification team
supposed to do all these tests?
Also, given that the patch comes from and is approved by upstream, given
that it's really tiny, given that it's been in -proposed for more than 3
months with no negative feedback (nor positive,
Can you reproduce this on saucy or trusty?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bind9 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247148
Title:
rndc addzone isn't working. fix available
To manage notifications about this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1241803 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1241803
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1241803
During Distribution Upgrade could not install 'nova-common'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team,
20 matches
Mail list logo
