Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
I'm just in the process to upgrade from latest Gutsy to Hardy final with
Update Manager via Internet.
The process hangs at Setting up samba-common (3.0.28a-1ubuntu4).
In /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log I find the message:
WARNING no activity on
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 221427 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221427
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 221427
package samba-common 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4 failed to upgrade from Gutsy to Hardy
--
Upgrading Gutsy to Hardy hangs at Setting up samba-common
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 260291 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260291
I've got the same problem (openvpn_execve: external program may not be
called due to setting of --script-security level) when connecting to my
employers VPN.
--
NM0.7/Intrepid regression: No longer possible
More Information (in German):
http://amor.cms.hu-berlin.de/~herenzed/blog/archives/2008/08/29
/openvpn_an_der_hu-berlin_update/index.html
--
Network Manager 0.7, openvpn, VPN Connection Failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260291
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I'd say its not an issue any more on 14.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to pm-utils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/379008
Title:
Active screen changes when suspending by lid close
To manage
Public bug reported:
This is a wishlist item.
I'd like to use DNSSEC for dnsmasq out of the box. Currently support for
DNSSEC appears to be disabled at compile time: if I add dnssec options
to the dnsmasq.conf, it doesn't accept the configuration. I'm using
Ubuntu Trusty.
As a workaround, I
Does anyone have instructions for how to configure this by hand on a
desktop Ubuntu vivid or wily installation?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to dnsmasq in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995332
Title:
Please
Public bug reported:
Currently the Groovy package depends on default-jre-headless (openjdk-7
-jre-headless) but I think it would also run on openjdk-8-jre-headless
or (even better) on the generic java7-runtime-headless (which allows
future Java 7 compatible runtimes) . Could you allow this as an