[Bug 571070] Re: Elinks no ECMAScript; should depend on either see or spidermonkey

2010-11-24 Thread Edward Lee
0.13-GIT (which I have in my PPA) builds against xulrunner for javascript now, removing the dependency on a foreign package. -- Elinks no ECMAScript; should depend on either see or spidermonkey https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571070 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 571070] Re: Elinks no ECMAScript; should depend on either see or spidermonkey

2010-07-17 Thread Edward Lee
Well, that's fixed now. -- Elinks no ECMAScript; should depend on either see or spidermonkey https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571070 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to elinks in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list

[Bug 571070] Re: Elinks no ECMAScript; should depend on either see or spidermonkey

2010-08-20 Thread Edward Lee
Sure, alright, but how? At any rate, though, I don't think libsee needs to be rediffed against maverick, as it mostly builds without issues. Elinks I'm not so sure about, but from going over my changes, it seems that it only needs --with-see in ./configure and ecmascript.enable in its

[Bug 571070] Re: Elinks no ECMAScript; should depend on either see or spidermonkey

2010-04-27 Thread Edward Lee
In my PPA there's a fixed version of elinks, along with the requisite libsee library [I did not compile libmozjs since it was removed from ubuntu] -- Elinks no ECMAScript; should depend on either see or spidermonkey https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571070 You received this bug notification