[Bug 1084089] Update Released

2012-12-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1076031] Update Released

2012-12-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1050351] Update Released

2012-12-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1077838] Update Released

2013-01-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1078530] Update Released

2013-01-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1080912] Update Released

2013-01-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1057024] Update Released

2013-01-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 919312] Re: SRU tracking bug for postfix 2.8.5 - 2.8.7 for natty/oneiric

2013-02-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: Scott Kitterman (kitterman) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: In Progress = Triaged ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Natty) Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1117761] [NEW] SRU Tracking Bug for Postfix 2.9.6

2013-02-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
: Invalid ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: High Assignee: Scott Kitterman (kitterman) Status: In Progress ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High Assignee: Scott Kitterman (kitterman) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: postfix

[Bug 1117761] Re: SRU Tracking Bug for Postfix 2.9.6

2013-02-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
Uploaded for precise/quantal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1117761 Title: SRU Tracking Bug for Postfix 2.9.6 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Bug 1118549] Re: postfix regression in raring: fails to pick up dynamic resolv.conf changes

2013-02-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
Looking in the source package, I see: update-libc.d:QUEUEDIR=$(/usr/sbin/postconf -h queue_directory 2/dev/null || true) I strongly suspect your theory about a local modification is correct. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 1121526] Re: False positives on trojans (Trojan.Agent-132354)

2013-02-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
Upstream bug, so reported there. ** Bug watch added: bugzilla.clamav.net/ #6865 https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=6865 ** Also affects: clamav via https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=6865 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug

[Bug 1121526] Re: False positives on trojans (Trojan.Agent-132354)

2013-02-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
Subject: [Bug 6865] False positives on trojans (Trojan.Agent-132354) https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=6865 Matthew Olney mol...@sourcefire.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1117761] Re: SRU Tracking Bug for Postfix 2.9.6

2013-02-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
Tested locally here and works (I have the precise package in production on one server). ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Quantal) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1117761] Update Released

2013-02-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

Re: [Bug 1147696] [NEW] Spamassassin crashes on one particular mail message

2013-03-05 Thread Scott Kitterman
Please file a bug upstream with spamassassin.apache.org. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to spamassassin in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1147696 Title: Spamassassin crashes on one particular mail message To

[Bug 1139159] Re: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL

2013-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1139159 Title: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL To

[Bug 1122946] Re: Log file is missing entries

2013-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
The syslog protocol is sometimes lossy when too many events are sent. This is by design. In general, if your system is missing log entries, it is trying to log too much and you'll need to reduce the amount of logging you are doing. This is not a postfix specific issue. ** Changed in: postfix

[Bug 1089342] Re: Postfix uses temporary IPv6 address for outbound connections

2013-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-13.04-beta-1 = ubuntu-13.04-beta-2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1089342 Title: Postfix uses temporary

[Bug 1155730] Re: postfix 2.10 for raring

2013-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
Ack. Glad to have this now that it's fixed up. Approved. I'll take care of the sync. ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott

[Bug 1155730] Re: postfix 2.10 for raring

2013-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
This bug was fixed in the package postfix - 2.10.0-2 --- postfix (2.10.0-2) unstable; urgency=low * Correctly set smtpd_relay_restrictions on upgrade to 2.10.0. Closes: #702374 -- LaMont Jones lam...@debian.org Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:15:51 -0600 postfix (2.10.0-1) unstable;

[Bug 1139159] Re: Postfix does not restart properly when using SSL

2013-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
This bug was fixed in the package postfix - 2.10.0-2 --- postfix (2.10.0-2) unstable; urgency=low * Correctly set smtpd_relay_restrictions on upgrade to 2.10.0. Closes: #702374 -- LaMont Jones lam...@debian.org Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:15:51 -0600 postfix (2.10.0-1) unstable;

[Bug 1155730] Re: postfix 2.10 for raring

2013-03-15 Thread Scott Kitterman
Fred: Please file a new bug on your issue. This bug was for getting the new version in and is done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1155730 Title: postfix 2.10 for

[Bug 1061244] Update Released

2013-03-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1016895] Update Released

2013-03-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 967410] Update Released

2013-03-17 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1157385] Re: 0.97.7 security update

2013-03-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Also affects: clamav (Ubuntu Hardy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott Kitterman (kitterman) -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1157385] Re: 0.97.7 security update

2013-03-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
raring - hardy debdiff. These are the same changes I've had to use in the past to get the current clamav to build on Hardy. ** Patch added: Hardy debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/1157385/+attachment/3588293/+files/hardy.debdiff -- You received this bug

[Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
I don't think making the package broken without additional configuration is acceptable in an SRU. This should have been mentioned up front. Thanks for noticing Julian. ** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a

Re: [Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
How are these upgrade instructions to be communicated to users? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1109283 Title: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise To manage

Re: [Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
Also, it seems to me that not mentioning this in the SRU bug, well, the nicest way I can put it, is 'substantially incomplete'. This isn't the kind of thing that should be handles via I talked to someone on the release team and they said it was fine (BTW, ubuntu-sru and ubuntu-release are not

[Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
Please don't ping pong the bug status. ** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1109283 Title: [SRU] maas

[Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
It might have been smarter not to shove MaaS into precise during release week, but we are where we are. It may be demo ware from an upstream PoV, but it's part of an Ubuntu LTS release. I know the general topic of MaaS was addressed with the tech board, but not, I don't believe, requiring

Re: [Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-22 Thread Scott Kitterman
Right. I got it. The point is that whatever users are using MaaS on precise now from the archive have already done some manual configuration, so the fact that the current package requires manual configuration isn't a concern from an SRU perspective. It's my understanding from reading the

Re: [Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
OK, let me see if I understand now ... If a current precise user didn't manually edit their dnsmasq.conf, then their MaaS is certain to be not working and so there's no risk of regression. If they did edit it and have a working system and then install the update, what will happen? If I'm

Re: [Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 11:11:24 PM Julian Edwards wrote: Please don't ping pong the bug status I didn't touch the bug status. Sorry, it was a tag, not a status, but a very important one for the SRU process. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

Re: [Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 04:19:41 PM you wrote: Whilst i'd normally entirely agree that this update poses scope for concern, the positives outweigh these concerns. I understood that this was the primary reason this issue was progressed to the TB for discussion. Would you please point me

[Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
I still don't think I have a clear answer to my question in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1109283/comments/18 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1109283

Re: [Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
Their changes won't be lost, but they also won't be used since (AIUI) you aren't using dnsmasq.conf anymore. If that's right then there are two cases: 1. Made manual dnsmasq.conf changes, but the automatic magic now works, so it doesn't matter. 2. Made manual dnsmasq.conf changes, but the

Re: [Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Thursday, April 25, 2013 01:07:51 AM you wrote: Now, since the SRU version of MAAS can be DNS/DHCP aware, and if the user wants MAAS to manage this, then the user will have to manually migrate from using the external dnsmasq to using a MAAS managed DNS/DHCP service, which is what I believe

[Bug 1172981] Re: clamav 0.97.8 security update

2013-04-25 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu Hardy) Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott Kitterman (kitterman) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172981 Title: clamav 0.97.8 security update

Re: [Bug 1109283] Re: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise

2013-04-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
And MaaS will continue to work without manual configuration? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1109283 Title: [SRU] maas to Quantal and Precise To manage notifications

Re: [Bug 1172981] Re: clamav 0.97.8 security update

2013-05-02 Thread Scott Kitterman
Hardy debdiff (relative to the package for 13.04) attached. ** Patch added: new.hardy.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172981/+attachment/3663306/+files/new.hardy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1079745] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1075859] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1073569] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1064914] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1062314] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1057125] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1056373] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1051924] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1050982] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1050025] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1046905] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1046313] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1045152] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1043999] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1040626] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1026210] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1017633] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1040537] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1041396] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1020555] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1039077] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1004791] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 996482] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 921774] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1089488] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1031291] Update Released

2013-05-16 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

[Bug 1103022] Update Released

2013-05-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
The verification of this Stable Release Update has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression

Re: [Bug 1175028] Re: Mongodb links GPL code with SSL

2013-07-08 Thread Scott Kitterman
For posterity, today the Ubuntu TB reviewed the question of if openssl counted as a system library per the GPL or if a specific GPL exception for openssl linking was required. They concluded that it is required for both GPL v2 and GPL v3:

[Bug 1198929] Re: freshclam ignoring apt option when upgrading

2013-07-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
Wouldn't this be a bug in apt then? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198929 Title: freshclam ignoring apt option when upgrading To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1198929] Re: freshclam ignoring apt option when upgrading

2013-07-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
Or dpkg? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198929 Title: freshclam ignoring apt option when upgrading To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 859658] Re: Add SSMTP entry

2011-09-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
Should have it's own profile. Not relevant to postfix. ** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) = ssmtp (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/859658 Title: Add

Re: [Bug 854899] Re: [FFe] Update to puppet-2.7.3

2011-09-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
There's a puppet in queue for accept before final freeze. Can the security fixes be added to it? How invasive are the non-security parts of the new upstream release? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to puppet in Ubuntu.

[Bug 869411] [NEW] SRU tracking bug for postfix 2.8.2 - 2.8.5 for natty

2011-10-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
Public bug reported: Pilot SRU for postfix post-release updates per TB on 10/6/11/ ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: postfix (Ubuntu Natty)

[Bug 869411] Re: SRU tracking bug for postfix 2.8.2 - 2.8.5 for natty

2011-10-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Natty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott Kitterman

[Bug 869411] Re: SRU tracking bug for postfix 2.8.2 - 2.8.5 for natty

2011-10-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
Passed the QA regression test (with -1, -2 doesn't affect the binary packages). root@utest-nns32:/tmp/qa-regression-testing/scripts# python ./test-postfix.py -vRunning test: './test-postfix.py' distro: 'Ubuntu 11.04' kernel: '2.6.38-11.50 (Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.50-generic-pae 2.6.38.8)' arch: 'i386'

Re: [Bug 869411] Re: SRU tracking bug for postfix 2.8.2 - 2.8.5 for natty

2011-10-07 Thread Scott Kitterman
OK. It was a lot easier just to keep the packaging the same then, so that's what I've done. The debian dir for the reuploaded SRU is the same as what's in natty-updates/security now except for the changelog entry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 848055] Re: amavisd-release not working when message contains empty X-Envelope-To-Blocked

2011-10-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
Marking Invalid based on upstream review. ** Changed in: amavisd-new (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/848055 Title:

[Bug 872024] Re: package postfix 2.8.2-1ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2011-10-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is not a package bug, but the package correctly responding to a bad configuration in your system: Running newaliases newaliases: warning: valid_hostname: invalid character 32(decimal): PARENTS PC newaliases: fatal: file /etc/postfix/main.cf: parameter myhostname: bad parameter value:

[Bug 491685] Re: memcached doesn't correctly daemonize

2011-10-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
Fixed in oneiric and later. ** Changed in: memcached (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to memcached in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/491685 Title: memcached

[Bug 882031] [NEW] SRU tracking bug for clamav 0.97.3

2011-10-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
Public bug reported: Clamav 0.97.3 has been released and per the TB microversion release exception should be uploaded to natty/oneiric. This is the tracking bug for the SRU. ** Affects: clamav (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: clamav (Ubuntu Natty)

[Bug 882031] Re: SRU tracking bug for clamav 0.97.3

2011-10-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
Not relevant for Precise. ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Also affects: clamav (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: clamav (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 882031] Re: SRU tracking bug for clamav 0.97.3

2011-10-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
Passed the security team QA suite on Natty and Oneiric. ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu Natty) Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu Natty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott Kitterman (kitterman

[Bug 882031] Re: SRU tracking bug for clamav 0.97.3

2011-10-26 Thread Scott Kitterman
Uploaded for natty-proposed and oneiric-proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882031 Title: SRU tracking bug for clamav 0.97.3 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 460316] Re: clamav-base package contains very big clamav data files (main.cvd and daily.cvd) from clamav-data package

2011-11-13 Thread Scott Kitterman
The claamav-data package is no longer maintained, so the assumptions underlying this bug are no longer valid. Switching back to shipping the definitions in the package was not accidental. ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 735072] Re: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing to work correctly.

2011-11-18 Thread Scott Kitterman
Looks like something that should be upstreamed to samba. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735072 Title: The hostname proposed by installer is too long for file sharing

[Bug 919312] [NEW] SRU tracking bug for postfix 2.8.5 - 2.8.7 for natty/oneiric

2012-01-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
: postfix (Ubuntu Natty) Importance: Medium Assignee: Scott Kitterman (kitterman) Status: In Progress ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu Oneiric) Importance: Medium Assignee: Scott Kitterman (kitterman) Status: In Progress ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu Precise) Importance

[Bug 919312] Re: SRU tracking bug for postfix 2.8.5 - 2.8.7 for natty/oneiric

2012-01-20 Thread Scott Kitterman
in: postfix (Ubuntu Natty) Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott Kitterman (kitterman) ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Oneiric) Assignee: (unassigned) = Scott Kitterman (kitterman) ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Natty) Milestone: None = natty-updates ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu Oneiric

[Bug 501364] Re: Postfix not sending SMFIC_RCPT to milter, libmilter rejecting state transition

2012-01-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
Fixed in the current release (and probably several before). ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.

[Bug 922600] Re: [FFe] Upgrade rabbitmq-server to 2.7.1

2012-02-27 Thread Scott Kitterman
As long as you've tested with all the rdepends, go ahead. ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rabbitmq-server in Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 922600] Re: [FFe] Upgrade rabbitmq-server to 2.7.1

2012-02-28 Thread Scott Kitterman
OK. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to rabbitmq-server in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922600 Title: [FFe] Upgrade rabbitmq-server to 2.7.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

Re: [Bug 948320] [NEW] main.cf should not refer to localhost

2012-03-06 Thread Scott Kitterman
It's not bulletproof on an IPv6 host. I think if you can't resolve localhost you have bigger problems. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/948320 Title: main.cf should

[Bug 950664] Re: Wrong FQDN after disconnected CD Install of precise beta1 - package postfix 2.8.7-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade

2012-03-09 Thread Scott Kitterman
Postfix failing to configure without a valid hostname is by design and not a bug. The installer is where this needs to be addressed. ** Package changed: postfix (Ubuntu) = debian-installer (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 274108] Re: postfix set-permissons fails

2012-03-12 Thread Scott Kitterman
It's a difference between the way Ubuntu packages postfix and some of the assumptions in the upstream code. It's an Ubuntu issue to deal with, but low priority. I think the current status confirmed/low is appropriate. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 961839] Re: FFe - Sync latest postfix release (2.9) from Debian

2012-03-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
This is something we definitely want. ** Summary changed: - FFe - Sync latest postfix minor release (2.9) from Debian + FFe - Sync latest postfix release (2.9) from Debian ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New =

[Bug 961839] Re: FFe - Sync latest postfix release (2.9) from Debian

2012-03-21 Thread Scott Kitterman
This bug was fixed in the package postfix - 2.9.1-2 Sponsored for LaMont Jones (lamont) --- postfix (2.9.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * Drop unnecessary openssl check, since sonames will save us. -- LaMont Jones lam...@debian.org Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:47:16 -0600 postfix (2.9.1-1)

[Bug 926772] Re: no icon visual in unity and unity 2d

2012-03-30 Thread Scott Kitterman
spamassassin is a command line tool. It doesn't have icons. ** Changed in: spamassassin (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to spamassassin in Ubuntu.

[Bug 970921] Re: Postfix 2.9.1 Crashing with Signal 6 - Postfix 2.8.5-2 works perfectly

2012-04-01 Thread Scott Kitterman
What comes right after: warning: /usr/lib/postfix/smtpd: bad command startup -- throttling ** Changed in: postfix (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to postfix in Ubuntu.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >