[Bug 665531] Re: libvirt no longer supports format=host_device

2010-11-23 Thread ariel
Uhm... this fix for Lucid (and therefore probably the older one in 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.5) did really break a working system!! We had a running system with Opennebula/KVM/libvirt and after last upgrade libvirt 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.3 0.7.5-5ubuntu27.7 creating virtual machines didn't work

[Bug 512887] [NEW] Restarting libvirtd breaks Eucalyptus NC

2010-01-26 Thread ariel
Public bug reported: Steps to reproduce: - make sure Eucalyptus NC is up and running - run /etc/init.d/libvirt-bin restart - try to start a new Instance. If all other NC's are busy and the new request lands in the current NC, then /var/log/eucalyptus/nc.log will show: [EUCAINFO ]

[Bug 512887] Re: Restarting libvirtd breaks Eucalyptus NC

2010-02-04 Thread ariel
Great, thanks! BTW, shouldn't this issue be reported upstream, to fix the NC to not loose the socket? Fixing eucalyptus-nc.upstart will handle the case of a civilized restart by the sysadmin, but not if for instance the libvirtd dies and gets started by hand with /usr/sbin/libvirtd -d right?

[Bug 512887] Re: Restarting libvirtd breaks Eucalyptus NC

2010-02-04 Thread ariel
It is upstream bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/eucalyptus/+bug/517340 No, IMHO they shouldn't fix it at the init script level but in the code itself. -- Restarting libvirtd breaks Eucalyptus NC https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 519513] Re: UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails

2010-02-23 Thread ariel
Hi, a comment to Boris' comment #2 first: Version info (after upgrade) ii eucalyptus-cc 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-cloud 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-common 1.6~bzr931-0ubuntu7.4 ii eucalyptus-gl 1.6.2~bzr1180-0ubuntu1 you still have some of the older Karmic packages

[Bug 519513] Re: UEC upgrade from 9.10 karmic to Lucid fails

2010-02-23 Thread ariel
Second comment :-) I am trying to achieve the same (ie, have Eucalyptus 1.6.2) but without doing a full upgrade to Lucid, just upgrading the required packages, in a NC for now. This combination still doesn't work for me (investigating further) but after i did update eucalyptus-nc with

[Bug 488285] Re: multipathd segfault

2010-05-15 Thread ariel
This is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519252 Fixed in Debian as of 0.4.8-15 Please update the Lucid package :-) Txs ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #519252 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519252 ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu)

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-20 Thread ariel
Same memory leak here, running kvm+libvirtd+multipath-tools on nodes with SAN access over QLogic cards However i noticed something which i guess is highly related: udev is constantly discovering the 4 multipath devices (sdb/sdc/sdd/sde) and causing a high CPU load of around 3 (8 CPU system). ps

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-20 Thread ariel
** Attachment added: udevadm monitor -e output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48809497/udev-events.txt.gz -- multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 571093] Re: multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-20 Thread ariel
I performed some additional observations, I agree Nigel's statements in #13: disabling the change ACTION in /lib/udev/rules.d/95-multipath.rules is just a bandaid, the memory leak is there anyways, just that it takes wy longer to fill in the memory. The problem solved by disabling the

[Bug 571093] Re: [SRU] multipath + libvirtd eats away more memory over time

2010-05-25 Thread ariel
Hi Nigel, Dustin, great, thanks!! i installed the two libvirt{0,-bin} packages from Maverick and testing right now. Sadly the memory leak is still there for me... If i leave the unmodified /lib/udev/rules.d/95-multipath.rules in operation the memory usage of libvirtd grows around 15M in

[Bug 1131828] [NEW] apache2.2 init.d script gives error due to msising double quotes

2013-02-22 Thread Ariel Glenn
Public bug reported: line 55: if [ ! -x $APACHE_HTTPD ] ; then should be if [ ! -x $APACHE_HTTPD ] ; then (so people passing 'nice blahblah' for example don't get spurious error messages. Thanks. ** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received

[Bug 1182947] [NEW] Cannot specify interpreter path in AGI call

2013-05-22 Thread Ariel Wainer
Public bug reported: When trying to call an AGI script like this exten = 1234,n,AGI(/path/to/interpreter /path/to/script,args) Asterisk says: WARNING[19529]: res_agi.c:1621 launch_script: Failed to execute '/path/to/interpreter /path/to/script': File does not exist. This is not serious, as

[Bug 1182947] Re: Cannot specify interpreter path in AGI call

2013-05-23 Thread Ariel Wainer
I agree, it should be fixed upstream, I'll test it on the latest version and report to asterisk bugtracker. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182947 Title: Cannot

[Bug 1182947] Re: Cannot specify interpreter path in AGI call

2013-05-23 Thread Ariel Wainer
Asterisk people didn't agree this is a bug: https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-21812 Should we close this one as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to asterisk in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1182947] Re: Cannot specify interpreter path in AGI call

2013-06-03 Thread Ariel Wainer
Just for the future peoplen finding this issue, this works: Instead of: exten = 1234,n,AGI(/path/to/interpreter /path/to/script,args) Do: exten = 1234,n,AGI(/path/to/interpreter,/path/to/script,args) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 579924] Re: Upgrading Ubuntu LTS skips database version - Fatal error: Version error for database bacula. Wanted 12, got 10

2010-07-29 Thread Ariel Wainer
I confirm this bug using Postgres when upgrading from 8.04 to 10.04. -- Upgrading Ubuntu LTS skips database version - Fatal error: Version error for database bacula. Wanted 12, got 10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 507217] [NEW] package smbclient 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: lectura insuficiente en buffer_copy (error en dpkg-deb durante `./usr/bin/smbtree')

2010-01-13 Thread Ariel Palazzesi
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: samba E: /var/cache/apt/archives/smbclient_2%3a3.4.0-3ubuntu5.3_i386.deb: lectura insuficiente en buffer_copy (error en dpkg-deb durante `./usr/bin/smbtree') ProblemType: Package Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jan 13 19:02:58 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu

[Bug 507217] Re: package smbclient 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.1 failed to install/upgrade: lectura insuficiente en buffer_copy (error en dpkg-deb durante `./usr/bin/smbtree')

2010-01-13 Thread Ariel Palazzesi
** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37863649/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37863650/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37863651/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 1019258] [NEW] package bacula-director-mysql 5.2.5-0ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128

2012-06-29 Thread pablo ariel rodriguez
Public bug reported: creo que el error es en mysql ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: bacula-director-mysql 5.2.5-0ubuntu6.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-26.41-generic 3.2.19 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-26-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date:

[Bug 1019258] Re: package bacula-director-mysql 5.2.5-0ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128

2012-06-29 Thread pablo ariel rodriguez
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019258 Title: package bacula-director-mysql 5.2.5-0ubuntu6.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation