[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882579 Title: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock To manage notifications about this

[Bug 734777] Re: cannot acquire state change lock problems

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
@Serge Hallyn I used 'ubunut-bug libvirt-bin' to open LP: #882579 about this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734777 Title: cannot acquire state change lock

[Bug 882579] [NEW] Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
Public bug reported: While attempting to use virsh commands this error occurs: Oct 27 08:52:22 boron libvirtd: 08:52:23.000: 25851: error : qemuDomainObjBeginJobWithDriver:453 : Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock While the error state is present certain commands like

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
Attached the output of for p in `pidof libvirtd`; do echo -n $p: cat /proc/$p/cmdline cat /proc/$p/cgroup cat /proc/$p/status done for p in `pidof kvm`; do echo -n $p: cat /proc/$p/cmdline cat /proc/$p/cgroup cat /proc/$p/status done **

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
While the VM guests were hung they were using 100% of the CPU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882579 Title: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
If this issue was seen on Maverick it is still an issue with Natty. I could try running tests on an Oneiric system too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882579 Title:

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
The system with 53 VM guests: ProLiant DL585 G5, Four CPU sockets each with Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 8382 The system with 14 VM guests: Sun Fire X4600 M2, Eight CPU sockets each with Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 8220 -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
Today two VM hosts running kernel 2.6.38-11, one with with 14 guests and another with 53 had scheduled reboots of the many of their guests. On the VM host with 14 guests, 11 rebooted. On the one with 53 guests, 48 rebooted. VM guests that automatically rebooted this morning at 6:30 AM via at(8)

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
Using kill -9 directly on the /usr/bin/kvm process of the hung VM guest that was using 100% CPU did restore the ability to use virsh start on the guest. That is consistent with the comment #26 by Daniel Berrange in the Red Hat ticket about The QEMU process has hung. -- You received this bug

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
If you look at the last comment in the Red Hat bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676205#c26 {{ 1. The QEMU process has hung. QEMU won't respond to monitor commands. The API call making the first monitor command will wait forever, any subsequent API calls issuing

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-27 Thread nutznboltz
I don't think virsh shutdown and virsh destroy are triggers. I think when the guest rebooted something went wrong and subsequent attempts to use virsh shutdown and virsh destroy fail. This morning the en-mass VM guest reboot was triggered by cron jobs inside the guests. I tried unsuccessfully

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-28 Thread nutznboltz
I've been able to narrow this down a little more. The number of VM guests is not a factor, this has happened on a VM host with only one guest. The VM guest kernel does not seem to matter either, even VM guests which are Linux distros other than Ubuntu are affected. It seems that the

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-30 Thread nutznboltz
Probably related thread: kvm linux guest hanging for minutes at a time http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg59479.html Notable in that thread: a post about using -F with trace-cmd too: http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Tracing http://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg59716.html a post which states: When

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-30 Thread nutznboltz
I have one that rebooted this morning and is spinning attaching gdb shows very little due to lack of symbol tables: (gdb) where #0 0x7f671aab3ff3 in select () from /lib/libc.so.6 strace shows a loop: Process 971 attached - interrupt to quit select(16, [7 10 13 14 15], [], [], {0, 995193})

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-31 Thread nutznboltz
This report (in German) https://forge.univention.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23258 suggests that when the guest VM is reset by a reboot the clock jumps backward in time. Two patches were suggested, both being necessary together: KVM: x86: Fix kvmclock bug backported to Natty Aug 11, 2011 but

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-31 Thread nutznboltz
This patch is missing from linux-lts-backport-natty-2.6.38 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/109436/ diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index 980317a..0556e05 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -2100,8 +2100,8 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-31 Thread nutznboltz
Please help apply patch http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/109436/ to linux-lts-backport-natty-2.6.38 thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882579 Title: Some

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-31 Thread nutznboltz
** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Description changed: + To reproduce: + + apt-get source linux-image-2.6.38-12-generic + + examine linux-lts-backport-natty-2.6.38/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c + + See missing patch: + + diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-31 Thread nutznboltz
** Tags removed: natty running-unity ** Tags added: lucid testcase -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882579 Title: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation:

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-31 Thread nutznboltz
This is a bug in the kernel not libvirt. ** Changed in: libvirt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882579 Title: Some

[Bug 882579] Re: Some Commands return: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock

2011-10-31 Thread nutznboltz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 795717 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795717 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 795717 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-10-31 Thread nutznboltz
to this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/kvm-clock-fix-for-2.6.38-on-lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795717 Title: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-10-31 Thread nutznboltz
@Stefan I'm in a good position to test as soon as the PPA completes building. I've had all sorts of issues relating to this and a number of systems to try it on. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu.

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-10-31 Thread nutznboltz
host: $ lsb_release -ds Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS $ uname -srvm Linux 2.6.38-12-server #51~lucid1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Sep 29 20:09:53 UTC 2011 x86_64 Qemu/KVM/Libvirt is the one from Natty backported to Lucid via PPA: https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/kvm-libvirt-lts $ dpkg -l | grep 0.14.0+noroms

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-01 Thread nutznboltz
The same VM host describe in comment #38 is now running 2.6.38-12.51.1~ppa1~lucid1 and the 32-bit RHEL-compatible VM guest does not hang while using 2 CPUs anymore. The VM host is also running two Ubuntu 10.04 and one Ubuntu 11.04 VM guests OK as well. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-01 Thread nutznboltz
On Wed Nov 2, 2011 the two VM hosts described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/882579/comments/5 are going to be rebooted with linux 2.6.38-12.51.1~ppa1~lucid1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-01 Thread nutznboltz
Since I promised to test on Natty too: VM host details: AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1100T Processor $ lsb_release -sd Ubuntu 11.04 $ uname -srvm Linux 2.6.38-12-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 28 14:27:32 UTC 2011 x86_64 $ dpkg -l | egrep 'qemu|libvirt|bios' ii libvirt-bin 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.5

[Bug 734777] Re: cannot acquire state change lock problems

2011-11-01 Thread nutznboltz
@Janne your issue is really a bug in Linux kernel KVM code being tracked in LP: #795717 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795717 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734777

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-01 Thread nutznboltz
linux_2.6.38-12.51.1~ppa1~natty1 (2.6.38-12 for Natty plus the patch this ticket is dealing with) has been uploaded to: https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/kvm-clock-fix-for-2.6.38-on-lucid When it compiles I'll repeat my test described in Comment #41 with the patch. -- You received

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-01 Thread nutznboltz
In comment #2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu-kvm/+bug/795717/comments/2 gdahlman's observation: {{ As an update I can boot when the guest is restricted to a single cpu ... }} I think means that on the VM host if /usr/bin/kvm is forced to run on only one CPU via setting its

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-02 Thread nutznboltz
I could not reproduce booting the guest by setting processor affinity to a single host CPU. 1. Start 32-bit 2-CPU RHEL-5 compatible VM guest and pause on grub screen 2. locked it to host CPU #1 $ sudo taskset -p 0x0001 3127 pid 3127's current affinity mask: 3f pid 3127's new affinity mask: 1

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-02 Thread nutznboltz
32-bit 2-CPU RHEL-5 compatible VM guest boots successfully on Natty with the patch which I installed into a kernel in this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/kvm-clock-fix-for-2.6.38-on-lucid $ uname -srvm Linux 2.6.38-12-generic #1~ppa2~natty1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 1 22:41:06 UTC 2011

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-02 Thread nutznboltz
Opened LP: #885170 to resubmit SRU request. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795717 Title: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty To manage

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-03 Thread nutznboltz
The servers which had the large outage incident on Wed Oct 26, 2011 described in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/882579/comments/5 were rebooted last night Wed Nov 2, 2011 off of the patched backport kernel in https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/kvm-clock-fix

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-03 Thread nutznboltz
Adding link to pending SRU page for convenience http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-09 Thread nutznboltz
** Tags added: patch testcase -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795717 Title: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty To manage notifications about this

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-11 Thread nutznboltz
How long does this take to show up? $ curl http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux/ 2 /dev/null | grep 38-13.52 | egrep -v 'diff|dsc' | sed 's/^.*deb//' | sed 's;/a.*$;;' linux-doc_2.6.38-13.52_all.deb linux-libc-dev_2.6.38-13.52_amd64.deb linux-libc-dev_2.6.38-13.52_i386.deb

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-11 Thread nutznboltz
I also checked in universe $ curl http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/l/linux/ 2 /dev/null | grep 38-12.51 | egrep -v 'diff|dsc' | sed 's/^.*deb//' | sed 's;/a.*$;;' | grep image.*generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-11 Thread nutznboltz
@Clint deb http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ natty-proposed main restricted universe multiverse $ apt-cache search 6.38-13 linux-backports-modules-cw-2.6.39-2.6.38-13-generic - compat-wireless Linux modules for version 2.6.38 on x86/x86_64 linux-backports-modules-cw-2.6.39-2.6.38-13-server -

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-11 Thread nutznboltz
I found a copy on 91.189.92.169 So I added to /etc/hosts this line: 91.189.92.169 archive.ubuntu.com Now I can install it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/795717

[Bug 795717] Re: 32bit rhel and centos 5.(5|6) hangs on boot on natty

2011-11-11 Thread nutznboltz
$ uname -srvi Linux 2.6.38-13-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 8 16:53:51 UTC 2011 x86_64 $ sudo virsh dumpxml opsi-1720 | grep cpu vcpu2/vcpu $ sudo virsh start opsi-1720 $ ssh root@opsi-1720 root@opsi-1720's password: Last login: Fri Nov 11 17:30:14 2011 [root@opsi-1720 ~]# lsb_release -a LSB

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-11-14 Thread nutznboltz
I could test on Natty later today. Adding link to pending SRU page for my convenience http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu.

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-11-14 Thread nutznboltz
Verified on natty-proposed. $ dpkg -l | grep libvirt | awk '{print $2 $3}' libvirt-bin 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.6 libvirt0 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.6 python-libvirt 0.8.8-1ubuntu6.6 $ lsb_release -ds Ubuntu 11.04 $ uname -srvi Linux 2.6.38-13-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Tue Nov 8 16:53:51 UTC 2011 x86_64 $ cat

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-11-16 Thread nutznboltz
In comment #104 Serge wrote that he did the verification on Maverick. Based on that I'll update the tags. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done-maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to

[Bug 350936] Re: Should shut down domains on system shutdown

2011-11-16 Thread nutznboltz
clint-fewbar, Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350936 Title: Should shut down domains on system shutdown To manage notifications

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-01-24 Thread nutznboltz
I tested with Ubuntu 12.04 today and the nscd work-around no longer works. The failure occurs with or without running nscd on Ubuntu 12.04. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu.

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-01-24 Thread nutznboltz
** Tags added: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd To

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
PPA for the patch suggested by Howard Chu's in comment #73 https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/howard-chu-libgcrypt11-patch- for-ldap-clients -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
According to Andreas Metzler http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2011/02/msg6.html {{ GnuTLS upstream has added support for different crypto backends in 2.11.x and has chosen nettle as prefered backend (2.10.x is using libgcrypt). }} I have started to experiment with using a gnutls26 package

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
This bug no longer pertains to be as it is opened against libgcrypt11 now and to me this is now a GnuTLS backend selection bug. I put the patched gnutls into this PPA as my preferred solution. https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/gnutls26-with-nettle -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-03 Thread nutznboltz
I meant to type no longer pertains to me not to be. I am unsubscribing from this bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL

[Bug 509734] Re: initgroups() fails when using libnss-ldap (but not nscd)

2012-02-04 Thread nutznboltz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 926350 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 423252 NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 926350 LDAP

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-04 Thread nutznboltz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 926350 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926350 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 926350 LDAP account via SSL cannot use setuid binaries until gnutls26 is rebuilt with nettle not libgcrypt11 -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid applications like su, sudo, apache2 suexec, and atd

2012-02-05 Thread nutznboltz
This will never be fixed in Lucid and Lucid has the use nscd work- around. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 Title: NSS using LDAP+SSL breaks setuid

[Bug 785424] Re: Double motd when ssh'ing into 10.04.2

2011-05-19 Thread nutznboltz
@Joshua Lückers openssh does not configure MOTD. $ dpkg -S /etc/update-motd.d base-files, update-notifier-common, update-manager-core: /etc/update-motd.d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu.

[Bug 785424] Re: Double motd when ssh'ing into 10.04.2

2011-05-19 Thread nutznboltz
$ grep motd.tail /etc/update-motd.d/99-footer # motd.tail is reserved for the admin to append static [ -f /etc/motd.tail ] cat /etc/motd.tail || true $ dpkg -S /etc/update-motd.d/99-footer base-files: /etc/update-motd.d/99-footer ** Package changed: openssh (Ubuntu) = update-notifier

[Bug 545795] Re: apparmor driver blocks access to some hostdev and pcidev devices

2011-06-07 Thread nutznboltz
@Sergey will you be submitting a debdiff any time soon? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545795 Title: apparmor driver blocks access to some hostdev and pcidev

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-16 Thread nutznboltz
@Weisi comment #7 is comment #6 in a patch file without line-breaks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632 Title: ntpd should run niced To manage notifications about

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-16 Thread nutznboltz
I should probably submit this change to Debian not Canonical. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632 Title: ntpd should run niced To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-19 Thread nutznboltz
You are supposed to be able to use the -N (--nice) option to ntpd but upstream ntp bug report shows it doesn't work: http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1230 Testing on 11.04 $ lsb_release -ds Ubuntu 11.04 $ uname -srv Linux 2.6.38-10-generic #46-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jun 28 15:07:17 UTC 2011 $ ntpd

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-19 Thread nutznboltz
I thought it might be because the setpriority() call was tried after permissions were dropped but running as UID 0 doesn't change the niceness as seen in ps output $ (ps alx | head -1) ; (ps alx | grep ntpd) | grep -v grep F UID PID PPID PRI NIVSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TTYTIME

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-19 Thread nutznboltz
When run with -N and -u 117:126 Aug 19 08:14:22 linux ntpd[14158]: sched_setscheduler(): Operation not permitted Aug 19 08:14:22 linux ntpd[14158]: setpriority() error: Permission denied Aug 19 08:14:22 linux ntpd[14158]: set_process_priority: No way found to improve our priority Freaking

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-19 Thread nutznboltz
I switched AppArmor for ntpd into complain mode $ sudo aa-complain /usr/sbin/ntpd Setting /usr/sbin/ntpd to complain mode. after that the ntpd -N flag started to work. $ (ps alx | head -1) ; (ps alx | grep ntpd) | grep -v grep F UID PID PPID PRI NIVSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TTYTIME

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-19 Thread nutznboltz
Oops, didn't read Jamie's posts until just now, thanks Jamie! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632 Title: ntpd should run niced To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-19 Thread nutznboltz
Can an SRU for Lucid be done for the AppArmor modification too? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632 Title: ntpd should run niced To manage notifications about this

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-19 Thread nutznboltz
@Jamie given that the default ntpd configuration is to poll and the stability of the clock affects the polling interval[1] I would strongly suggest the default ntpd configuration be adjusted to run with the -N option since it would cut down on the load of NTP servers if polling was less frequent.

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-19 Thread nutznboltz
The minimum sleep time between ntpd upstream requests is 64 seconds. With 64000 clients an ntpd server must answer one thousand requests per second. If the client ntpd clocks are very stable they will ratchet back to one request every 1024 seconds (about 17 minutes) so the same 6400 clients would

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2011-08-19 Thread nutznboltz
Try with and with out ntpd -N option. Use ntpq -p or ntpdc -c peers to view the polling interval. Both reports have a poll column which is the sleep time in seconds between requests being sent out over the network to the upstream NTP source. The poll column will eventually change from 64 to 128

[Bug 777626] Re: package libapache2-mod-php5 5.3.5-1ubuntu7.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2011-09-08 Thread nutznboltz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 349469 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349469 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 349469 debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process: Resource temporarily unavailable -- You received this bug

[Bug 537757] Re: PHP modules removed when upgrading apache2 to 2.2.11-2ubuntu2.6

2011-09-08 Thread nutznboltz
Is this a duplicate of LP: #349469 ? I ask because LP: #774214 was marked as a duplicate of LP: #349469 and this one appears similar. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 591489] Re: QEMU_AUDIO_DRV set to none by libvirtd in Lucid

2010-11-01 Thread nutznboltz
Instead of QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=alsa /usr/bin/kvm.bin $@ use QEMU_AUDIO_DRV=alsa exec /usr/bin/kvm.bin $@ also in /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf # QEMU implements an extension for providing audio over a VNC connection, # though if your VNC client does not support it, your only chance for getting # sound

[Bug 666180] Re: KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386 10.04 minimal server images

2011-01-09 Thread nutznboltz
@Philippe Gauthier I tried getting rid of libvirt and invoking qemu directly but that did not help. All of these fail the same way: qemu -M pc -hda /img/lenny-vol.img -m 1024 -cdrom /iso/debian-507-i386-netinst.iso -net nic,vlan=0 -net user,vlan=0,hostname=emu -monitor pty -boot d qemu -M pc

[Bug 666180] Re: KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386 10.04 minimal server images

2011-01-24 Thread nutznboltz
@Aaz, if you run the non-PAE 32-bit kernel does the issue go away? I know that you won't be able to use all 4GB RAM without PAE, I'm just interested in testing PAE vs. non-PAE. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm

[Bug 666180] Re: KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386 10.04 minimal server images

2011-01-24 Thread nutznboltz
I can't test; my only AMD box is now converted to 64-bit in reaction to this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666180 Title: KVM does not boot Ubuntu i386

[Bug 545795] Re: apparmor driver blocks access to some hostdev and pcidev devices

2011-03-08 Thread nutznboltz
For Lucid: https://launchpad.net/~nutznboltz/+archive/kvm-libvirt-lts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545795 Title: apparmor driver blocks access to some hostdev

[Bug 317401] Re: Wrong documentation for TLSCipherSuite

2009-08-05 Thread nutznboltz
Can anyone explain what the syntax is for using more than one cipher with gnutls TLSCipherSuite? Using a colon separated list fails even when the individual items from the list work as single ciphers. That is to say: TLSCipherSuite FOO works and TLSCipherSuite BAR works but TLSCipherSuite

[Bug 409423] Re: OpenLDAP Can't Set Multiple Ciphers Using TLSCipherSuite

2009-08-05 Thread nutznboltz
Oops. Please close this as invalid. TLSCipherSuite is working with colon separated lists for me. Sorry about any confusion. -- OpenLDAP Can't Set Multiple Ciphers Using TLSCipherSuite https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/409423 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 528720] Re: Keyboard stuck with irqbalance

2010-06-01 Thread nutznboltz
Boot from the alternate CD and select Rescue a Broken System. -- Keyboard stuck with irqbalance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528720 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to irqbalance in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing

[Bug 646468] Re: Apparmor deny when trying to use hugetlbfs

2010-09-25 Thread nutznboltz
Look at this PPA https://launchpad.net/~jcollins/+archive/jaminppa -- Apparmor deny when trying to use hugetlbfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. --

[Bug 463684] Re: openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic

2010-09-29 Thread nutznboltz
CentOS 6 + http://directory.fedoraproject.org/ FTW! -- openldap sections in ubuntu server guide not updated for packages in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463684 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap in ubuntu.

[Bug 661706] [NEW] Eucalyptus Attempts to use 172.19/16 Regardless of Existing Network Configuration

2010-10-16 Thread nutznboltz
Public bug reported: Just try bringing up Eucalyptus when the front end network is 172.16/12 You will fail since 172.19/16 cannot be used. Internet - [host configured as gw with DHCP to LAN set to 172.16/12] - 172.16/12 internal network - [install Eucalyptus CC and watch fail] ** Affects:

[Bug 661706] Re: Eucalyptus Attempts to use 172.19/16 Regardless of Existing Network Configuration

2010-10-17 Thread nutznboltz
** Description changed: Just try bringing up Eucalyptus when the front end network is 172.16/12 You will fail since 172.19/16 cannot be used. Internet - [host configured as gw with DHCP to LAN set to 172.16/12] - 172.16/12 internal network - [install Eucalyptus CC and watch fail] +

[Bug 317401] Re: Wrong documentation for TLSCipherSuite

2009-10-28 Thread nutznboltz
I am not having this problem in Hardy with slapd 2.4.9-0ubuntu0.8.04.3. -- Wrong documentation for TLSCipherSuite https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317401 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openldap2.3 in ubuntu. --

[Bug 317401] Re: Wrong documentation for TLSCipherSuite

2009-10-28 Thread nutznboltz
Jaunty uses a newer libgnutls option. The slapd.conf man page (and slapd-conf man page) still says you can find cipher names for TLSCipherSuite (and olcTLSCipherSuite) by running gnutls-cli -l but names output by that command are not accepted as options for TLSCipherSuite. This is a bug in the

[Bug 317401] Re: Wrong documentation for TLSCipherSuite

2009-10-29 Thread nutznboltz
Names and descriptions of the cipher suites supported by the libgnutls26 package on Jaunty and Karmic are available here: http://www.gnu.org/software/gnutls/reference/gnutls-gnutls.html#gnutls- priority-init -- Wrong documentation for TLSCipherSuite https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/317401 You

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2010-02-09 Thread nutznboltz
You can edit your defaults file to run ntpd at maximum priority: --- /etc/default/ntp~ 2009-12-04 13:07:15.0 -0500 +++ /etc/default/ntp2010-02-09 17:56:07.0 -0500 @@ -1 +1 @@ -NTPD_OPTS='-g' +NTPD_OPTS='-g -N' -- ntpd should run niced https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2010-02-09 Thread nutznboltz
Actually the -N argument does nothing. -- ntpd should run niced https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to ntp in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2010-02-09 Thread nutznboltz
Hacking the startup script seems to be the best temporary fix. -- default-intrepid-ntp-init-script 2010-02-09 15:01:43.255277872 -0500 +++ /etc/init.d/ntp 2010-02-09 15:02:48.0 -0500 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ exit 1 fi lock_ntpdate -

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2010-02-10 Thread nutznboltz
** Patch added: Adds an option to /etc/default/ntp to make the priority level of ntpd configurable. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39006866/ntp-priority.patch -- ntpd should run niced https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2010-02-10 Thread nutznboltz
We are limited a single NTP upstream source due to political reasons outside our control and our Ubuntu ntpd loses sync periodically. I tried a number of solutions but they all failed. When I tried setting the ntpd server's nice value to negative eight it just works. Clearly the stability of

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2010-02-10 Thread nutznboltz
Edit: while true ; do ntpq -p | grep name-of-upstream-time-source | logger -t ntpq -p daemon.info; sleep 64; done the sleep 64 was missing. -- ntpd should run niced https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which

[Bug 229632] Re: ntpd should run niced

2010-02-10 Thread nutznboltz
Scheduler preemption of ntpd causes the time on other systems to appear unstable since measurements are ruined if preemption occurs during them. -- ntpd should run niced https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/229632 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team,

[Bug 552029] [NEW] vmbuilder: error: no such option: --in-place

2010-03-30 Thread nutznboltz
Public bug reported: Manual page documents --in-place option but when I tried to invoke it I get: vmbuilder: error: no such option: --in-place LP #536940 says that the --tmpfs option had a similar issue. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: python-vm-builder 0.12.3-0ubuntu1

[Bug 552029] Re: vmbuilder: error: no such option: --in-place

2010-03-30 Thread nutznboltz
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42545351/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42545352/RelatedPackageVersions.txt -- vmbuilder: error: no such option: --in-place