[Bug 961226] Re: cloud-init should run resize2fs in the background

2012-04-10 Thread Scott Moser
** Changed in: cloud-init Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961226 Title: cloud-init should run resize2fs in the

[Bug 961226] Re: cloud-init should run resize2fs in the background

2012-03-22 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package cloud-init - 0.6.3~bzr551-0ubuntu1 --- cloud-init (0.6.3~bzr551-0ubuntu1) precise; urgency=low * New upstream snapshot. * support running resize2fs in the background (default=off) (LP: #961226) -- Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com Thu, 22 Mar

[Bug 961226] Re: cloud-init should run resize2fs in the background

2012-03-21 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:cloud-init -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961226 Title: cloud-init should run resize2fs in the background To manage notifications about

[Bug 961226] Re: cloud-init should run resize2fs in the background

2012-03-21 Thread Scott Moser
** Also affects: cloud-init Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/961226 Title: cloud-init should run resize2fs in the

[Bug 961226] Re: cloud-init should run resize2fs in the background

2012-03-21 Thread Alex Bligh
The particular development platform I was trying this has an I/O speed about the same as a floppy disk drive, so this is perhaps not as important as one might think. However, it might still be useful as a feature to speed up boot time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 961226] Re: cloud-init should run resize2fs in the background

2012-03-21 Thread Scott Moser
I've decided to turn this into a config option and leave it off by default (block on resize2fs). this is pretty much worst possible scenario for io * on disk file was stored as 1.4G ish (possibly larger, but sparse) * hypervisor grows it to some larger size (10 or 20G or something) but