Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 03:36 AM, Mike Holstein wrote: i think this was just a miscommunication. i appreciate your through answer, and understand the points you make. the point i was making as to why no one is uploading files to ubuntu(studio), was, we dont really need to get coders to

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Set Hallstrom
On 2015-08-22 11:56, Set Hallstrom wrote: strong gut feeling. physical realm? That came out wrong :D From the good side of the guts I'm talking about a friendly meeting, coffee discussion, organisation etc... :D Not a fist match for next boss or anything stupid, yeah :D:D Yours, Set

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Set Hallstrom
I apologize for stepping in impromptu with perhaps yet another obvious question mark on my forehead, without really understanding what is being discussed, talking solely from a strong gut feeling. When was the last time the ubuntustudio-dev-team had a meeting in the physical realm? *Set H. --

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Ross Gammon
On 08/22/2015 12:00 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: On 2015-08-22 11:56, Set Hallstrom wrote: strong gut feeling. physical realm? That came out wrong :D From the good side of the guts I'm talking about a friendly meeting, coffee discussion, organisation etc... :D Not a fist match for

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: On 08/22/2015 12:00 PM, Set Hallstrom wrote: On 2015-08-22 11:56, Set Hallstrom wrote: strong gut feeling. physical realm? That came out wrong :D From the good side of the guts I'm talking about a friendly meeting,

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: The Linux Audio Conference would be a good place to meet up at though, if we were able to do that sometime. Also, there's DebConf, which I have attended once. Though not directly linked to Ubuntu Studio, there's a chance to meet up with

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:00:07 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote: Not a fist match for next boss or anything stupid, yeah :D:D Are you sure that you are aware about what's going on in your mind? Have you seen Fight Club? The guy wasn't aware about what's going on in his mind. Seemingly not a remake of an

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Ross Gammon
On 08/22/2015 12:41 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: The Linux Audio Conference would be a good place to meet up at though, if we were able to do that sometime. I have always wanted to go there. Also, there's DebConf, which I have attended once.

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: On 08/22/2015 12:41 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: The Linux Audio Conference would be a good place to meet up at though, if we were able to do that sometime. I have always wanted to go

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Wubi - nuke it from orbit

2015-08-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
I have only used wubi to install Ubuntu, and my experience with that is not exactly great. The virtual hard drive is really, really slow. I fear that even if Ubuntu Studio works with wubi, it will give the user a bad impression. So, there's that too. I could give it a try on a Win8 machine

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Jimmy Sjölund
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: On 08/22/2015 12:41 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 12:38 PM, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: The Linux Audio Conference would be a good place to meet up at

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:44:39 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: So, to answer your question why some packages aren't making it into Ubuntu - no one seems interested enough to package them, or there is a problem with the package following Debian or Ubuntu policies. I really don't know which. The Ubuntu

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 03:39 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:44:39 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: So, to answer your question why some packages aren't making it into Ubuntu - no one seems interested enough to package them, or there is a problem with the package following Debian or

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Wubi - nuke it from orbit

2015-08-22 Thread Timo Jyrinki
Didn't https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2015-August/015757.html just tell wubi has had only a simple please reboot functionality for a long time, but causing confusion since it's still named wubi, and all the documentation everywhere? It's useful that there's a dialog

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Wubi - nuke it from orbit

2015-08-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 04:10 PM, Timo Jyrinki wrote: Didn't https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2015-August/015757.html just tell wubi has had only a simple please reboot functionality for a long time, but causing confusion since it's still named wubi, and all the

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Packages up for removal, unless someone wants to maintain them

2015-08-22 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 19:38:15 +0200, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: As long as it is functional, it seems there is some reason to keep it. But, I can't try it until Monday, the earliest. If we keep it, we become maintainers and it will only exist in Ubuntu. That leaves us more time to figure out another

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] continued as per request, from IRC

2015-08-22 Thread Mike Holstein
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Kaj Ailomaa zeque...@mousike.me wrote: On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 03:36 AM, Mike Holstein wrote: i think this was just a miscommunication. i appreciate your through answer, and understand the points you make. the point i was making as to why no one is

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Packages up for removal, unless someone wants to maintain them

2015-08-22 Thread Len Ovens
On Sat, 22 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: phat is not included in our seeds. But, it's in the meta package called multimedia-devel. But, that should be safe to remove. That only leaves jack-rack. How badly do we want to keep it? Is there a utility like dssi-host-jack for ladspa plugins to

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Packages up for removal, unless someone wants to maintain them

2015-08-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, at 07:23 PM, Len Ovens wrote: On Sat, 22 Aug 2015, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: phat is not included in our seeds. But, it's in the meta package called multimedia-devel. But, that should be safe to remove. That only leaves jack-rack. How badly do we want to keep it? Is

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Wubi - nuke it from orbit

2015-08-22 Thread lukefromdc
The linked post or one of it's replies warns of bricking windows, if it is moved off the disk, the exe file executed from the windows drive, and installer mode selected. I have no idea if that is true or not, but be sure to do any testing of this beyond the reboot greeter on an expendable

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Packages up for removal, unless someone wants to maintain them

2015-08-22 Thread Kaj Ailomaa
phat is not included in our seeds. But, it's in the meta package called multimedia-devel. But, that should be safe to remove. That only leaves jack-rack. How badly do we want to keep it? -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: