Because that’s not how it works. If it’s in upstream Debian, it is in Ubuntu.
Remember, Ubuntu Studio is not a separate distribution from Ubuntu. Therefore,
when a package is in Debian, we work with that.
From: ubuntu-studio-devel on
behalf of Jonathan
What about not pulling the package from Debian due to this and compiling it
specifically for US?
From: ubuntu-studio-devel On
Behalf Of Erich Eickmeyer
Sent: 01 February 2019 06:56
To: Ubuntu Studio Development
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] LMMS & Calf: The Ongoing Saga
Yes. The Calf
Yes. The Calf developers have and were met with the response of a brick wall.
Ross is working on it.
From: ubuntu-studio-devel on
behalf of Jonathan Aquilina
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 9:54 PM
To: Ubuntu Studio Development
Subject: Re:
Has anyone tried to speak to the maintainer to try and ascertain the reasoning
behind it?
Regards,
Jonathan
From: ubuntu-studio-devel On
Behalf Of Erich Eickmeyer
Sent: 01 February 2019 06:43
To: Ubuntu Studio Development
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] LMMS & Calf: The Ongoing Saga
LMMS
LMMS isn’t the problem. The problem was erroneous packaging by the Debian
packager.
The ladspa version of the Calf plugins were never meant to be exposed to other
applications besides LMMS, but the packager of LMMS in Debian decided to expose
the ladpsa version to the rest of the system
Has anyone even subscribed to the lmms mailing list to discuss this there and
maybe get it squared away once and for all?
-Original Message-
From: ubuntu-studio-devel On
Behalf Of er...@ericheickmeyer.com
Sent: 01 February 2019 00:49
To: Ubuntu Studio Development
Subject:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019, er...@ericheickmeyer.com wrote:
Specifically to Ross: where are we at with this bane-of-our-existence
conflict (LP: 1810534)? ISO builds are still failing and will probably
fail until we can get lmms from Debian to build properly.
Wait for LMMS to stop using depricated
Hi everyone,
Specifically to Ross: where are we at with this bane-of-our-existence
conflict (LP: 1810534)? ISO builds are still failing and will probably
fail until we can get lmms from Debian to build properly.
So, any more word?
Thanks,
Erich
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
