Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing

On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, Set Hallstrom wrote: Top posting because you already know what is below. I don't see any problems with content or grammer or spelling. How about this? cfhowlett, any input? some one care for checking my plurals and grammar? :) Am I Forgetting something or

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing

Hi all, On 2016-06-28 19:39, Ross Gammon wrote: > I think it would be a good idea to put the message out on the US > blog, and forum. Maybe that we could state that: > 1. we have just started on the work, and the first one (ardour) will > hopefully be available soon. > 2. Backports have to be

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing

On 2016-06-28 19:39, Ross Gammon wrote: Hi All, Thanks for the testing! I think it should be enough to please the Backporters Team, and they will hopefully look at it soon. Sorry for being a bit silent lately. Due to a hard disk issue, my main machine was slowing to a crawl constantly.

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing

Hi All, Thanks for the testing! I think it should be enough to please the Backporters Team, and they will hopefully look at it soon. Sorry for being a bit silent lately. Due to a hard disk issue, my main machine was slowing to a crawl constantly. That's why I dropped out during the Team Meeting

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing

UbuntuStudio team, thanks for the Ardour Backport, this is because the default Ardour that come with UbuntuStudio 16.04 not working fine. When I set QjackCtl to 128 square/periods and try to save my voice at the same time that I hear in the laptop the reproductions, appear a message that said

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing

Bumping up Ross' email. Continuing from tonight's meeting, do we want to put this to forum and/or blog so that if anyone wants to help out from our user base they are aware? autumna On 05/27/2016 10:59 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: Hi All, As Set pointed out, we now have the latest version of

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing

Olá agradecido... HIPHOPGERAIS INTERCÂNBIO 2016-05-29 5:57 GMT-03:00 Set Hallstrom : > On 2016-05-27 21:59, Ross Gammon wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > > Q: I want to help, so how do I test? > > A: > > Step 1 ... [snip] > > Thank you so much for pushing this through Ross!!

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing

On 2016-05-27 21:59, Ross Gammon wrote: > Hi All, > > Q: I want to help, so how do I test? > A: > Step 1 ... [snip] Thank you so much for pushing this through Ross!! You are a blessing! Yours, -- Set Hallstrom aka sakrecoer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Call for Ardour Backport Testing

Hi All, As Set pointed out, we now have the latest version of Ardour ready to be tested for Backporting to Xenial and Trusty. We need to test that all of the binary packages install OK, and work. We also need to check all reverse dependencies, but as these are mostly "metapackages",it shouldn't