Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

I just noticed that the background speed seems to be slower to me while watching it on full screen mode (which I did while testing it). So at this point I don't know what to say! On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 6:41 PM, One Chamois wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Fourth version with

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

Hello everyone! Fourth version with 50 samples, of course! I changed the speed of the background. Don't know which speed do I prefer. Personally, I would say an average between the 3rd and this version, what do you think? https://youtu.be/Huyz5DhxLOI Best regards -- ubuntu-studio-devel

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

The background of the Video section is currently a Blender screenshot. It should be a screenshot of the first application. On Sep 23, 2016 08:50, "One Chamois" wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Here is the third version of the video, as always rendered with 50 samples. > > Are

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

On the 23.09.2016 at 08:49 One Chamois wrote: > Are the texts slow enough now? Yes, this is perfect to me. Not too slow and everything is readable moderately. Backgrounds are also a bit more dynamic like that, but that's up to your choice if you wanna keep it or not. Anyway, good job! --

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

On 2016-09-23 08:49, One Chamois wrote: > Hello everyone! > > Here is the third version of the video, as always rendered with 50 samples. > > Are the texts slow enough now? The video is more or less 3 seconds > longer than the last one, but if it is still too fast I will change it. > >

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

Hello everyone! Here is the third version of the video, as always rendered with 50 samples. Are the texts slow enough now? The video is more or less 3 seconds longer than the last one, but if it is still too fast I will change it. https://youtu.be/QgBex9DwUVY Best regards --

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

Hi! Am 18.09.2016 um 13:24 schrieb One Chamois: > Hey Thomas, > > > Is it legal to mention Adobe softwares? Sorry, maybe I have written a bit unclear. As you already wrote, I was reffering to common substitutes, not the Adobe software itself. Again, just some suggestions. I don't know how

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

Hey Thomas, Sorry, I misunderstood your email. Thank you for the advices, I'll work on it. On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 1:24 PM, One Chamois wrote: > Hey Thomas, > > > Is it legal to mention Adobe softwares? > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Pfundt

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

Hey Thomas, Is it legal to mention Adobe softwares? On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Thomas Pfundt wrote: > Hey guys, > > I just saw the second video and I really like it visually! Love the > construction of the logo at the end. > > I just have two general suggestions:

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

Hey guys, I just saw the second video and I really like it visually! Love the construction of the logo at the end. I just have two general suggestions: First, did you try adding slight transition effects to the text/backgrounds? Sometimes only animating the text to scale down by 5% from fading

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

söndagen den 18:e september 2016 kl. 11:09:15 CEST, Jonathan Aquilina skrev: Did not mean to derail the thread, I did leave it be and the funny thing this is outlook 2016 on an office 365 subscription. Email provider is me myself and I on my own server setup. Anyway

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

...@lists.ubuntu.com [mailto:ubuntu-studio-devel-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of Set Hallstrom Sent: 18 September 2016 11:08 To: ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video > > From: ubuntu-studio-devel-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com > [mailto:ubuntu-studio-d

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

From: ubuntu-studio-devel-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com [mailto:ubuntu-studio-devel-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of One Chamois Sent: 18 September 2016 09:33 To: ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Subject: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video Hello everyone! I'm sending you the second

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

-studio-devel] Video Hello everyone! I'm sending you the second version of the video. As the first version, this video is rendered with 50 samples. https://youtu.be/QZaXJIk6kQU Best regards -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

Hello everyone! I'm sending you the second version of the video. As the first version, this video is rendered with 50 samples. https://youtu.be/QZaXJIk6kQU Best regards -- ubuntu-studio-devel mailing list ubuntu-studio-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at:

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

söndagen den 11:e september 2016 kl. lördagen den 10:e september 2016 kl. 21:03:49 CEST, One Chamois skrev: Hello everyone! https://youtu.be/_Q2qA6JZl8g one thing that hits me now, is that the logo is wrong and also the woodmark. its important that you use the

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

One nitpick I would have is to perhaps in audio, graphics, video scenes, maybe darken the screenshots so that the text is a little more visible. (not a lot, just a tiny bit). Overall this looks really nice through!!! We could put this into the front page as it is! :) Eylul On 09/10/2016 10:19

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

lördagen den 10:e september 2016 kl. 21:03:49 CEST, One Chamois skrev: Hello everyone! https://youtu.be/_Q2qA6JZl8g holy kazo! wow! ... WOW! short, precise, good looking and loopable! i'm in awe, so my spontaneous reaction is 'awesome'! :) <3 -- Set

[ubuntu-studio-devel] Video

Hello everyone! I send you the first version of the video. The texts are taken from http://ubuntustudio.org/ and obviously they can be changed. I made this video with blender and used cycles render engine (not the blender engine one). The image is a little bit noisy (because it is rendered with

Re: [ubuntu-studio-devel] Video conferencing - was... something else

One other thing you should check before committing to any kind of video conferencing is that all intended participants have the bandwidth for it, as those without landlines might not. On 7/10/2016 at 4:57 PM, "Len Ovens" wrote: > >On Sun, 10 Jul 2016, lukefro...@hushmail.com