Hi Mark,
2010/6/20 mark :
[...]
> Where can I find the -lowlatency and -preempt binaries for lucid?
I just updated these on the my PPA.
Ciao,
Alessio
--
Ubuntu-Studio-users mailing list
Ubuntu-Studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Alessio and everyone
>>> Could you evaluate and compare those results with -lowlatency kernel
>>> available on https://launchpad.net/~abogani/+archive/ppa/+packages,
>>> please?
I had a look at the page specified above, and I saw -lowlatency pa
Hi all,
Brian David wrote:
>
> I'd like to add that the hideous boot sequence is not just a problem
> for UbuStu. For many graphics cards, including the ATI on my desktop,
> the Lucid boot sequence will only show in the lowest resolution, and
> with all sorts of command line text showing up.
Hi Brian,
2010/6/11 Brian David :
[...]
>> Could you evaluate and compare those results with -lowlatency kernel
>> available on https://launchpad.net/~abogani/+archive/ppa/+packages,
>> please?
[...]
> With the -lowlatency kernel, performance was moderate. Running Hyrdrogen
> through a few JACKRa
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:32 AM, laurent.bellegarde <
laurent.bellega...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Scott and all,
>
> Le 09/06/2010 19:40, Scott Lavender a écrit :
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:32 PM, laurent.bellegarde <
> laurent.bellega...@free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Hi Scott.
>>
>> Well, it's a good pr
Hi Scott and all,
Le 09/06/2010 19:40, Scott Lavender a écrit :
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:32 PM, laurent.bellegarde
mailto:laurent.bellega...@free.fr>> wrote:
Hi Scott.
Well, it's a good program.
Few things, as i've done an official conference about UBS at Paris
Ubuntu Part
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> 2010/6/8 Brian David :
> [..]
> > On a final note, a long running issue for me is how often a quality rt
> > kernel is left out of the releases. On my system, at least, the RT
> kernel
> > is the only one that gives good e
You are right, it is probably not a good idea to start calling Ubuntu Studio
> 'pro' just yet. I suppose the main thrust of what I'm saying is that we
> should be up front about the fact that Ubuntu Studio is a complex and
> advanced system, but point out how this is good thing by explaining the
>
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Scott Lavender wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Brian David wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm going to play devil's advocate here, and suggest that Ubuntu Studio
>> should not be user oriented. At least, not in the sense that a main
>> priority would be to make things a
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Brian David wrote:
>
> I'm going to play devil's advocate here, and suggest that Ubuntu Studio
> should not be user oriented. At least, not in the sense that a main
> priority would be to make things as simple as possible. It seems to me that
> a lot of problems
Brian: if it makes a difference, I run Kubuntu Studio 10.04 64 amd on my PC;
I've reported a xorg bug [to ubuntu.com/X/Reporting] on an upgrade built on
a -lowlatency kernel and cannot find work arounds that give me sound, Jack
Control, Skype or open office in a correct on screen appearance.
Let'
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jose H. wrote:
> I have the crazy idea that Ubuntu Studio should be user oriented.
>
> If that was the case, ubuntu studio needs to solve two really big issues:
>1) complexity: PA vs Jack => ubuntu studio vs the user, Windows and Mac
> will win
>
I agree and w
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:32 PM, laurent.bellegarde <
laurent.bellega...@free.fr> wrote:
> Hi Scott.
>
> Well, it's a good program.
>
> Few things, as i've done an official conference about UBS at Paris
> Ubuntu Party.
>
> - Many people ask for a viewable boot ! Many beleive that there was a
> bug
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Hartmut Noack wrote:
>
>
> BUT to gain the trust of the users PA must become much more
> user-configurable then before. The first step should be a "disable
> PA"-switch in a decent, accessible GUI (could be a mixer). This should
> be possible *without* removing PA
Hi Brian,
2010/6/8 Brian David :
[..]
> On a final note, a long running issue for me is how often a quality rt
> kernel is left out of the releases. On my system, at least, the RT kernel
> is the only one that gives good enough performance. The vanilla and preempt
> kernels produce far too many
Hartmut Noack schrieb:
[snipped]
> PLUS: Audio is most important for UBS because one can install GIMP,
> Blender, Synfig, Inkscape or any other graphics-app on any standard
> generic Linux and it will work. Not so will jack, Ardour and the like,
> they need a system, that is carefully tweaked to
Am 08.06.2010 01:53, schrieb teza:
> Le 07/06/2010 22:29, Hartmut Noack a écrit :
>>
> Hi, I agree for Guitarix this software made a big jump lately. Where did
> you find the calf plugin you show in the picture?
This is the stand of affairs in:
http://repo.or.cz/r/calf.git
:-) :-)
most of the n
If Brian is going to play DA, I have to stick up for him: real pro
audio equipment requires constant cleaning, tuning and calibration,
unlike your consumer-grade home-E system. What sets Logic and ProTools
apart from Garage Band are deep functionality and flexibility, which
come with steep learning
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Jose H. wrote:
> I have the crazy idea that Ubuntu Studio should be user oriented.
>
> If that was the case, ubuntu studio needs to solve two really big issues:
>1) complexity: PA vs Jack => ubuntu studio vs the user, Windows and Mac
> will win
>2) stabilit
I have the crazy idea that Ubuntu Studio should be user oriented.
If that was the case, ubuntu studio needs to solve two really big issues:
1) complexity: PA vs Jack => ubuntu studio vs the user, Windows and Mac
will win
2) stability: jacks crashes, timidity crashes, etc.
Shouldn't JACK
Le 07/06/2010 22:29, Hartmut Noack a écrit :
> Am 07.06.2010 21:46, schrieb Scott Lavender:
>
>
>
>> As project lead I hope to provide active, direct leadership in a transparent
>> manner.
>>
> Transparency is indeed crucial. It is a major advantage of free software
> and I think it could
Am 07.06.2010 22:32, schrieb laurent.bellegarde:
> - Many people ask about software distribution, for many, UBS is too
> music edition designed, and not enough image/Video edition completed.
Sorry but whenever I read this, I fail to understand it. There is
absolutely NO overweight of music-produ
Hi Scott.
Well, it's a good program.
Few things, as i've done an official conference about UBS at Paris
Ubuntu Party.
- Many people ask for a viewable boot ! Many beleive that there was a
bug during the boot !
- Many people ask about software distribution, for many, UBS is too
music edition d
Am 07.06.2010 21:46, schrieb Scott Lavender:
> As project lead I hope to provide active, direct leadership in a transparent
> manner.
Transparency is indeed crucial. It is a major advantage of free software
and I think it could be pushed some more in Ubuntu overall. Personally I
have noticed y
Hello all,
I wanted to take a little time to post an update to the -user mailing list
about Ubuntu Studio and the project lead position in particular.
During this cycle (Maverick) I have assumed the responsibilities for the
project lead position. However, the transition really began during Lucid
25 matches
Mail list logo