On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:53:13PM +, Chris Rowson wrote:
Are you entirely sure chaps?
No :)
I thought JeOS was a bare-bones operating system designed for people
to base virtual appliances on.
Tht makes more sense, yes :)
I was wrong, sorry.
Cheers
Al.
--
On 1/12/08, Alan Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:53:13PM +, Chris Rowson wrote:
Are you entirely sure chaps?
I thought JeOS was a bare-bones operating system designed for people
to base virtual appliances on.
Tht makes more sense, yes :)
I don't
On a box at home, I have ssh running on a non-specific high numbered
port. Is it possible to also have it (ssh) listen on port 22, but
limit it to computers on the local network?
The reason for asking is that I'd like to do things like synchronise
my tomboy notes over ssh, but there is nowhere in
Couldn't you use port forwarding on your router?
So have the sshd running on port 22 but expose it to the world at large on
port, say, 2000 ?
Sean
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.kubuntu.org/UKTeam/
On 12/01/2008, Sean Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Couldn't you use port forwarding on your router?
So have the sshd running on port 22 but expose it to the world at large on
port, say, 2000 ?
Sean
That will do nicely, cheers!
--
Steve Garton
http://www.sheepeatingtaz.co.uk
--
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:13:56AM +, Stephen Garton wrote:
On a box at home, I have ssh running on a non-specific high numbered
port. Is it possible to also have it (ssh) listen on port 22, but
limit it to computers on the local network?
Why also have it on 22? Why not just edit
Hi Al,
On 12/01/2008, Alan Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:13:56AM +, Stephen Garton wrote:
On a box at home, I have ssh running on a non-specific high numbered
port. Is it possible to also have it (ssh) listen on port 22, but
limit it to computers on the local
Stephen Garton wrote:
SNIP
Sorry, I think I'm lost. Will tomboy sync over ssh when a non-standard
port is used?
From the seems of it - tomboy won't allow non standard ssh ports. You
could work around it by mounting via fuse/sshfs and sync'ing with the
local mount point. However, i'd
Sean Miller wrote:
On 1/12/08, *Alan Pope* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:53:13PM +, Chris Rowson wrote:
Are you entirely sure chaps?
I thought JeOS was a bare-bones operating system designed for people
to base virtual
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 01:23:15PM +, Sean Miller wrote:
I wouldn't waste time on this... as I said, just make the router expose your
port 22 on your local server on another port to the internet through port
forwarding. You'll need to also route whatever other ports you want (eg.
port 80)
Michael Holloway wrote:
Has anybody else tried jeOS yet?
I have tried it on 3 different VMWare servers, 2 AMD based, and one
Intel. No matter how hard i try, i cant get it to work. It installs
fine, and then freezes on boot, failing to load the Kernel. It would
appear that it cant mount the
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 12:56:30PM +, Stephen Garton wrote:
Hi Al,
On 12/01/2008, Alan Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:13:56AM +, Stephen Garton wrote:
On a box at home, I have ssh running on a non-specific high numbered
port. Is it possible to also
Alan Pope wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 12:56:30PM +, Stephen Garton wrote:
Hi Al,
On 12/01/2008, Alan Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:13:56AM +, Stephen Garton wrote:
On a box at home, I have ssh running on a non-specific high numbered
port.
Tom Bamford wrote:
[...]
I also use FreeNX for remote access to Gnome desktops which doesn't yet
work properly when you use a different port and block password
authentication. So I just use Denyhosts to block clients that fail
authentication, 1 try for the root account and 3 tries for any
Tom Bamford wrote:
I don't bother changing the server port for sshd, it's security
through obscurity.
There's nothing wrong with using obscurity to achieve enhanced defence
in depth; running ssh on a non-standard port raises the bar enough to
thwart most automated, background noise brute-force
I run all my sshd servers (on the www) on 23432.
Easy to remember but not the first place the hackers look.
So I think it's definitely worth doing... but if you're on a home network
and have a router and need port 22 for your local access why not use the
router to transform?
Sean
--
Sean Miller wrote:
I run all my sshd servers (on the www) on 23432.
Easy to remember but not the first place the hackers look.
So I think it's definitely worth doing... but if you're on a home network
and have a router and need port 22 for your local access why not use the
router to
On 1/12/08, Chris Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I run my own SSH servers on the same ports internally and externally
means I only need one ~/.ssh/config which keeps everything much more sane.
Yes, but that wasn't the question.
He wanted a sshd listening on port 22 for his tomboy or
Sean Miller wrote:
I run all my sshd servers (on the www) on 23432.
Easy to remember but not the first place the hackers look.
Hello, Sean.
They will now ;-)
So I think it's definitely worth doing... but if you're on a home
network and have a router and need port 22 for your local access
Apologies if this request about Thunderbird is a bit off-topic, but it
should be brief if anyone has a ready answer. I've been googling around
for days and can't find one.
I'm running Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (installed via Ubuntuzilla) on Feisty.
Is there add on or applet to provide a persistent
I just read an article in Micro Mart mag by a self-proclaimed linux noob
called Jason d'Allison. He set out to install Gutsy after hearing good
things about it, and although it took him 3 weeks to secure a machine to
install it on, after two weeks he was enjoying the difference and after
Mac wrote:
Apologies if this request about Thunderbird is a bit off-topic, but it
should be brief if anyone has a ready answer. I've been googling around
for days and can't find one.
I'm running Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (installed via Ubuntuzilla) on Feisty.
Is there add on or applet to
The main article on the cover in MM was about Ubuntu when feisty came out...
But it never hurts for them to repeat how great it is. (I think most of the
writers for it are freelance, so theyre bound to repeat themselves XD)
On Jan 12, 2008 11:23 PM, Tom Bamford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just
Adam Bagnall wrote:
Mac wrote:
snip
Is there add on or applet to provide a persistent indicator in the
system tray when there's new mail waiting to be read?
I think mail-notification might be what you're after. It's in the
repositories. The only thing to watch out for is the repository
24 matches
Mail list logo
