>> I have now tried Rhythmbox, Amarok, and Banshee, and Banshee does seem
>> to be the easiest to use --- you can compile a music library rather than
>> being pushed straight into playlists (as with Amarok), and you can
>> easily select to play albums, from the albums pane. But I would like to
>>
Rowan Berkeley wrote:
> I have now tried Rhythmbox, Amarok, and Banshee, and Banshee does seem
> to be the easiest to use --- you can compile a music library rather than
> being pushed straight into playlists (as with Amarok), and you can
> easily select to play albums, from the albums pane. But I
Matthew Daubney wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:28 +0100, mac wrote:
>> Matthew Daubney wrote:
>>> You can use the uid and gid options with mount to make it mount fat32
>>> drives as if you own all the files. e.g.
>>>
>>> sudo mount /dev/sdX /media/MOUNTPOINT -o uid=1000,gid=1000
>>
>> That's use
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Tim Dobson wrote:
> Good luck with your event, I know several people who would probably be
> interested in Dorset, so make sure you forward it to the right place :)
> (I think it's Dorest LUG?!)
Not heard of them... we had a few folks turn up to the Glastonbury
gr
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Chris Rowson
wrote:
> Well you're all invited to my Windows 7 release party anyway
That's a top distro that is.
:-)
Sean
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 14:28 +0100, mac wrote:
> Matthew Daubney wrote:
> > You can use the uid and gid options with mount to make it mount fat32
> > drives as if you own all the files. e.g.
> >
> > sudo mount /dev/sdX /media/MOUNTPOINT -o uid=1000,gid=1000
>
>
> That's useful to know. I guess,
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 10:25 +0100, Lucy wrote:
> A the Manchester release party there was at least one person in a
> Debian t-shirt and while people were keen to show off Ubuntu on their
> laptop I'm pretty sure most people there used/use at least one other
> distro.
There was a good number of peo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Taylor wrote:
> Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>
Harry Rickards wrote:
John Taylor wrote:
>>> Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> John Taylor wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Ala
Harry Rickards wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Taylor wrote:
>
>> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> John Taylor wrote:
>>
>>
> Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>
>
>
Alan Pope wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Rickards wrote:
> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> John Taylor wrote:
>>> Harry Rickards wrote:
>>> Are you trying to install from a Jaunty CD, or via the internet? If via
>>> the internet, try changing the following line in /etc/apt/sources.list:
>
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> John Taylor wrote:
>
> Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>
>
Alan Pope wrote:
> 2009/4/26 John T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Taylor wrote:
> Harry Rickards wrote:
> John Taylor wrote:
>
Harry Rickards wrote:
John Taylor wrote:
>>> Alan Pope wrote:
>>>
>>>
2009/4/26 John Taylor :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Rowson wrote:
>
>
> 2009/4/27 Alan Pope mailto:a...@popey.com>>:
> > 2009/4/27 Tim Dobson mailto:li...@tdobson.net>>:
> >> While I was at FOSDEM this year, in the build up to the Debian Lenny
> >> release, I hung out with a load
Neil Greenwood wrote:
>
> I managed to fool WUBI in the past by copying my local ISO into the
> directory in which it was trying to download. IIRC, I had to restart
> WUBI for it to pick it up, but then it didn't download anything and
> worked with my local copy.
>
That's the experience I have
2009/4/27 Gordon :
> davmor2 wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:47:53 +0100, Gordon wrote:
>>> Alan Pope wrote:
2009/4/27 Gordon :
> Downloaded 9.04 iso (yes, the right one!) and 9.04 WUBI over a faster
> connection than I have.
Which ISO did you grab? Whats the filename?
>>>
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:47:53 +0100, Gordon wrote:
> Alan Pope wrote:
>> 2009/4/27 Gordon :
>>> Downloaded 9.04 iso (yes, the right one!) and 9.04 WUBI over a faster
>>> connection than I have.
>>
>> Which ISO did you grab? Whats the filename?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Al.
>>
>
>
> ubuntu-9.04-desktop-
davmor2 wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:47:53 +0100, Gordon wrote:
>> Alan Pope wrote:
>>> 2009/4/27 Gordon :
Downloaded 9.04 iso (yes, the right one!) and 9.04 WUBI over a faster
connection than I have.
>>> Which ISO did you grab? Whats the filename?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Al.
>>>
>>
2009/4/27 Matthew Daubney
> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 12:57 +0100, Stephen Garton wrote:
> > Afternoon All,
> >
> > I have a spare drive in my machine, formatted as fat32. All of the
> > folders in this drive (automounts to /media/storage) as listed as
> > being owned by root. When I try to change th
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:47:53 +0100, Gordon wrote:
> Alan Pope wrote:
>> 2009/4/27 Gordon :
>>> Downloaded 9.04 iso (yes, the right one!) and 9.04 WUBI over a faster
>>> connection than I have.
>>
>> Which ISO did you grab? Whats the filename?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Al.
>>
>
>
> ubuntu-9.04-desktop-
Matthew Daubney wrote:
> You can use the uid and gid options with mount to make it mount fat32
> drives as if you own all the files. e.g.
>
> sudo mount /dev/sdX /media/MOUNTPOINT -o uid=1000,gid=1000
That's useful to know. I guess, though, you couldn't preserve other
ownerships / permissions
On Mon, April 27, 2009 12:57, Stephen Garton wrote:
> Afternoon All,
>
> I have a spare drive in my machine, formatted as fat32. All of the
> folders in this drive (automounts to /media/storage) as listed as
> being owned by root. When I try to change this (I've tried sudo
> chown -R and sudo nauti
I have a Nvidia G4 graphics card, now i know in 8.10 it took abit of doing
to sort out the resolution and even then when a new Kernel was loaded i had
to repeat the process again. Now im getting the same thing in 9.04, would
have thought it might have been resolved, but its not. Just wondering if
Alan Pope wrote:
> 2009/4/27 Gordon :
>> Downloaded 9.04 iso (yes, the right one!) and 9.04 WUBI over a faster
>> connection than I have.
>
> Which ISO did you grab? Whats the filename?
>
> Cheers,
> Al.
>
ubuntu-9.04-desktop-i386.iso
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
2009/4/27 Gordon :
> Downloaded 9.04 iso (yes, the right one!) and 9.04 WUBI over a faster
> connection than I have.
Which ISO did you grab? Whats the filename?
Cheers,
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UKTeam/
Downloaded 9.04 iso (yes, the right one!) and 9.04 WUBI over a faster
connection than I have.
Put them both in the same directory, as previous versions, started WUBI
and it doesn't see the local iso AT ALL - it just tries to download
again from the internet.
Any way to correct this?
--
ubuntu-u
On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 12:57 +0100, Stephen Garton wrote:
> Afternoon All,
>
> I have a spare drive in my machine, formatted as fat32. All of the
> folders in this drive (automounts to /media/storage) as listed as
> being owned by root. When I try to change this (I've tried sudo chown
> -R and sudo
2009/4/27 Chris Rowson :
>
> Well you're all invited to my Windows 7 release party anyway
>
Bet you wont get to babble drunkenly like a village idiot at the
financial benefactor as I did last Thursday :S
Cheers,
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/u
2009/4/27 Alan Pope :
> > 2009/4/27 Tim Dobson :
> >> While I was at FOSDEM this year, in the build up to the Debian Lenny
> >> release, I hung out with a load of Debian Devs.
> >> Despite declaring Lenny stable being more of a formality for the
> >> developers than anything else, the atmosphere wa
Sean Miller wrote:
> Why are Linux people so "territorial"??
>
> Any attempts I make in Somerset to organise a release party for
> something like Ubuntu gets folks saying "can't be doing with that -
> Debian's the only decent distro" or "Sorry, that's one of those Debian
> derivitives isn't it? a
2009/4/27 mac
> Stephen Garton wrote:
> > I have a spare drive in my machine, formatted as fat32...
> > Any idea why this would be, and/or how I can change the permissions to my
> > user?
>
> AFAIK you can't set permissions on FAT32
>
> mac
>
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.
Stephen Garton wrote:
> I have a spare drive in my machine, formatted as fat32...
> Any idea why this would be, and/or how I can change the permissions to my
> user?
AFAIK you can't set permissions on FAT32
mac
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
Afternoon All,
I have a spare drive in my machine, formatted as fat32. All of the folders
in this drive (automounts to /media/storage) as listed as being owned by
root. When I try to change this (I've tried sudo chown -R and sudo nautilus)
I get permission denied errors.
Any idea why this would b
2009/4/27 Alan Pope :
> 2009/4/27 Tim Dobson :
>> While I was at FOSDEM this year, in the build up to the Debian Lenny
>> release, I hung out with a load of Debian Devs.
>> Despite declaring Lenny stable being more of a formality for the
>> developers than anything else, the atmosphere was electric
2009/4/27 Tim Dobson :
> Lucy wrote:
>> Certainly, I don't remember so
>> much positive buzz around the last Fedora release and the last Debian
>> release seemed to create plenty of negativity.
>
> With all due respect, I do not agree with this at all.
>
> While I was at FOSDEM this year, in the bu
Lucy wrote:
> Certainly, I don't remember so
> much positive buzz around the last Fedora release and the last Debian
> release seemed to create plenty of negativity.
With all due respect, I do not agree with this at all.
While I was at FOSDEM this year, in the build up to the Debian Lenny
releas
Harry Rickards wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Taylor wrote:
>
>> Harry Rickards wrote:
>> John Taylor wrote:
>>
>>
> Alan Pope wrote:
>
>
>> 2009/4/26 John Taylor :
>>
>>
>>
>>> Seem
2009/4/27 Sean Miller :
> Why are Linux people so "territorial"??
>
> Any attempts I make in Somerset to organise a release party for
> something like Ubuntu gets folks saying "can't be doing with that -
> Debian's the only decent distro" or "Sorry, that's one of those Debian
> derivitives isn't it
I have now tried Rhythmbox, Amarok, and Banshee, and Banshee does seem
to be the easiest to use --- you can compile a music library rather than
being pushed straight into playlists (as with Amarok), and you can
easily select to play albums, from the albums pane. But I would like to
know how to prev
38 matches
Mail list logo
