Rob Beard wrote:
Still, sounds good that they are releasing something under the GPL,
funny how they didn't release it under GPL 3.
Because that would mean it couldn't go into Linux?
James
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
alan c wrote:
can be made easily. The foss rising tide will mean this may not be
with computing.
Should there be any such 'rising tide', and it become entirely clear
that there is no money to
be made in software RD (only in supporting 'innovation ... elsewhere')
then where is
the
Sean Miller wrote:
So I'd be amazed if Canonical have built a support model whereby if
you have 10 servers only one is supported if you pay them £1,500 or
whatever it works out at in UK terms... if you have an issue on one
server then chances are it's also an issue on the other nine... so
Chris Rowson wrote:
If I had 10 servers I wouldn't pay $27,500 for email/telephone support
covering only the operating system.
I suspect that if you knew what the inside of a datacentre looked like,
you'd feel differently
The sad fact of the matter is that Windows is not an expensive system
Daniel Lamb wrote:
No but seriously how can anyone have anything again linux? I really
struggle with that.
Hmm. I've been using Linux since Yggdrassil was the new kid on the
block and I could
get an SLS subscription on 3.5 floppies. And I definitely have things
against Linux. Take
off the
Chris Rowson wrote:
Who wrote this? I've not read anything as poorly thought out and badly
researched as this in a long time!
Actually I found out exactly who writes this pro MS anti Linux stuff...
It's the chairman of the FSB IT committee, who coincidentally develops
software using -
