Morning All,
Wonder if anyone can suggest anything to help me fix a small problem I am
having. I am using Kubuntu with KDE 4.6.5 and Kmail 1.13.6 collecting email
using IMAP. Whenever I open Kmail any existing mail does not show in the
preview pane until I double click to open it. After this
On Sunday 31 Jul 2011 11:35:52 Vince Marsters wrote:
Morning All,
Wonder if anyone can suggest anything to help me fix a small problem I am
having. I am using Kubuntu with KDE 4.6.5 and Kmail 1.13.6 collecting email
using IMAP. Whenever I open Kmail any existing mail does not show in the
On Friday 16 Oct 2009 21:00:56 Alan Pope wrote:
2009/10/16 Rob Beard r...@esdelle.co.uk:
Oh dear. I'm sure it was discussed a week or so ago about upgrading
between versions. I gather it's not a good idea to upgrade from more
than one version to another at a time, so I guess from Hardy,
Mark Fraser wrote:
I've tried the Kubuntu mailinglist, but haven't had a response. So I thought
I'd try here.
I tried to upgrade my wife's computer from Hardy to Jaunty this week after
successfully doing it on 2 other computers. This time it started coming up
with error messages saying
2009/10/16 Rob Beard r...@esdelle.co.uk:
Oh dear. I'm sure it was discussed a week or so ago about upgrading
between versions. I gather it's not a good idea to upgrade from more
than one version to another at a time, so I guess from Hardy, you'd need
to upgrade to Intrepid, then Jaunty.
I really like the Hardy (alpha 5) Kubuntu curly swirly wallpaper. 6.06
(misty bubbles) was not bad, it had a level of subtlety and mystery
which I appreciated, but since then I have been a bit unhappy with the
un inspired defaults - which live CD users get.
This Kubuntu alpha 5 has what looks
Chris Rowson wrote:
Scrase, Eddie wrote:
I'm probably stating the obvious here, but if the two bars are a
problem, you can always move everything from the top bar down to the
bottom and then delete the top bar (which is what I have done on my
installation). You can also replace the Gnome
On 17/09/2007, Chris Rowson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scrase, Eddie wrote:
I'm probably stating the obvious here, but if the two bars are a
With reference to the 2-bars setup, My mother-in-law uses Ubuntu (on
my recommendation!), and the first thing she mentioned when I asked
her how she was
It all comes down to personal preference I guess, but the nice thing
about Gnome is that it hides the complexity of the system from the
user unless they actively go searching for it - and to someone for
whom a computer is effectively just a web-browser and a platform for
email and IM clients
I'm probably stating the obvious here, but if the two bars are a problem, you
can always move everything from the top bar down to the bottom and then delete
the top bar (which is what I have done on my installation). You can also
replace the Gnome Applications/Places/System menus with a
Scrase, Eddie wrote:
I'm probably stating the obvious here, but if the two bars are a
problem, you can always move everything from the top bar down to the
bottom and then delete the top bar (which is what I have done on my
installation). You can also replace the Gnome
Scrase, Eddie wrote:
I'm probably stating the obvious here, but if the two bars are a
problem, you can always move everything from the top bar down to the
bottom and then delete the top bar (which is what I have done on my
installation). You can also replace the Gnome
Chris Rowson wrote:
I promise, I'm not trolling!
I've been moving users across from Windows to Linux for a while now,
with - on the large - reasonable success. Because I use Gnome, and
don't have much experience of using KDE, I've just always installed
Ubuntu by default and not really given
I promise, I'm not trolling!
I've been moving users across from Windows to Linux for a while now,
with - on the large - reasonable success. Because I use Gnome, and
don't have much experience of using KDE, I've just always installed
Ubuntu by default and not really given Kubuntu the time of day.
On 9/15/07, Chris Rowson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I promise, I'm not trolling!
It's unavoidable when you mention KDE and GNOME in the same email :)
Lately, I've demonstrated Ubuntu to some real computer novices who've
commented why is the start button at the top, and why are there two
bars
definitely worth a look so you can see for yourself.
Matthew.
I thought that might be worth a bash Matthew,
I've just installed Kubuntu Gutsy Tribe 5 to see what all of the fuss
is about. In the past I've only tried installing kubuntu-desktop over
the top of gnome. First impressions are that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/09/2007, Chris Rowson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
definitely worth a look so you can see for yourself.
Matthew.
I thought that might be worth a bash Matthew,
I've just installed Kubuntu Gutsy Tribe 5 to see what all of the fuss
is
I think this is definitely one for personal preference. I think that
Kubuntu and kde have a lot to offer. However I personally prefer
gnome. This isn't because I'm some numpty like some people would
insist but because it works the way I expect it to.
This is definitely a suck and see
Hi Folks
At the LUG meeting I went to last night, one of the guys was trying to
install kubuntu onto his new laptop - an Advanta (?) that currently has
vista on it. He wanted to make it a dual boot machine, so far so good.
However, when the Live CD booted up, the maximum screen size it would
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 19:03 +0100, James Hargreaves wrote:
For anyone downloading Kubuntu 7.04 desktop i386 , I suggest using the
HTTP download, the torrent is much slower (25kbps compared to ~70kbps
for HTTP) at the moment.
Are you on British Telecom? I heard a rumour that bittorrent was
Tristan,
Tristan Wibberley wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 19:03 +0100, James Hargreaves wrote:
For anyone downloading Kubuntu 7.04 desktop i386 , I suggest using the
HTTP download, the torrent is much slower (25kbps compared to ~70kbps
for HTTP) at the moment.
Are you on British Telecom? I
For anyone downloading Kubuntu 7.04 desktop i386 , I suggest using the HTTP
download, the torrent is much slower (25kbps compared to ~70kbps for HTTP)
at the moment.
Cheers,
James
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 07:03:06PM +0100, James Hargreaves wrote:
For anyone downloading Kubuntu 7.04 desktop i386 , I suggest using the HTTP
download, the torrent is much slower (25kbps compared to ~70kbps for HTTP)
at the moment.
That's not normal. Have you opened the necessary ports on
Ok, I gave this whole screencast thing a go, it's on upgrading packages, like
Alans last one, but for Kubuntu.
It's not what you'd call in-depth but I tried to cover the same stuff Alan
went over in his one.
It's about 7 mins long and covers the Adept updater and Adept package manager,
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:13:08AM +, Stuart Parkington wrote:
Ok, I gave this whole screencast thing a go, it's on upgrading packages,
like Alans last one, but for Kubuntu.
It's not what you'd call in-depth but I tried to cover the same stuff Alan
went over in his one.
It's about
Stuart Parkington wrote:
Ok, I gave this whole screencast thing a go, it's on upgrading packages,
like Alans last one, but for Kubuntu.
It's not what you'd call in-depth but I tried to cover the same stuff Alan
went over in his one.
It's about 7 mins long and covers the Adept updater and
Tez wrote:
It's also on archive.org but doesn't seem to be live yet,
You can now watch it or download it from archive.org
http://www.archive.org/details/Installing_Updates_Kubuntu
Tez
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-uk
27 matches
Mail list logo
