[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 251443]

2018-12-18 Thread Daniel Stone
I assume it's relatively well known, but here's where I landed. My plan to fix this, was to bypass XKM support completely, by integrating the parser into the server. Currently the server forks xkbcomp to build a particular keymap, xkbcomp produces (lossy) XKM files, and then the server consumes

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 36812]

2018-06-08 Thread Daniel Stone
(In reply to Daniel Stone from comment #191) > Another, probably better, way to do it would be to define a new flag like > XkbSA_HasGroupFlags inside the XkbModAction flags field when group_flags and > group_XXX are valid rather than potentially garbage. That would avoid the > w

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 36812]

2018-06-08 Thread Daniel Stone
(In reply to Andreas Wettstein from comment #190) > No news since. Apart from the formal proposal, there are some old patches > for its implementation: > https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-November/034427.html > https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2012-November/034430.html >

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 36812]

2018-06-08 Thread Daniel Stone
(In reply to Kovács Viktor from comment #181) > Sorry, on newer Linux you can set up hot key combination for that problem as > graphical UI settings, older Linux versions will not be updated. May I close > It? Please do not close this bug. If you do not want to receive any further updates on it,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1013881]

2014-05-19 Thread Daniel Stone
At the risk of just making things worse ... My €0.02 is that we should stick with level 5 right Control as being optional. This is a marginal (in terms of percentage of userbase that will ever see/use it) layout that people have to go out of their way to use, but still taking away a modifier is a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 221112]

2014-05-19 Thread Daniel Stone
At the risk of just making things worse ... My €0.02 is that we should stick with level 5 right Control as being optional. This is a marginal (in terms of percentage of userbase that will ever see/use it) layout that people have to go out of their way to use, but still taking away a modifier is a

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 592550]

2013-07-15 Thread Daniel Stone
This is not an upstream issue, but caused by an Ubuntu patch to cache the output of xkbcomp. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to x11-xkb-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592550 Title: setxkbmap fills in

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 626321]

2012-12-23 Thread Daniel Stone
(In reply to comment #6) This bug should be closed. X11 is not a platform for fullscreen applications that set their own resolution (like video games.) Please use Microsoft Windows for this kind of stuff. What are you on about? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 260074]

2012-08-09 Thread Daniel Stone
Can't get the debug output, so assuming it's been fixed in the meantime. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xkeyboard-config in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260074 Title: Some keys are not recognised on

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 521381]

2012-08-09 Thread Daniel Stone
Classic evdev vs. pc105 misconfiguration and/or client bug. gnome- settings-daemon was broken for a long time here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xkeyboard-config in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521381 Title:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 313514]

2012-04-27 Thread Daniel Stone
On 9 March 2012 00:56, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: --- Comment #48 from maximlevit...@gmail.com 2012-03-08 16:56:28 PST --- Especially knowing that on protocol level XI2 does support extended events. Its just matter of fixing X code. To an extent, yes. Extended keycodes could

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 313514]

2012-04-27 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi, On 9 March 2012 12:51, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: --- Comment #50 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2012-03-09 04:51:08 PST --- (In reply to comment #49) On 9 March 2012 00:56,  bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: --- Comment #48 from

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 36812]

2011-12-26 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:05:34AM -0700, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: --- Comment #85 from kyak b...@bmail.ru 2011-04-08 01:05:27 PDT --- (In reply to comment #84) (In reply to comment #83) thanks. empty rhetoric is the greatest way of motivating developers. This bug just

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 251443]

2011-12-07 Thread Daniel Stone
Unfortunately we can't fix this for anything that uses XKM, since it would be a format break to do so. What we _can_ do is to more aggressively deprecate the use of XKM, which means having the server use xkbcommon (which I'm working on, more or less) in particular. -- You received this bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 531208]

2011-11-24 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 11:50:39PM -0800, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: Lol, it’s 2011, and X still can’t do this. *facepalm* Even Windows 2000 could do this, over, you guessed it, 11 years ago. Thanks so much for your valuable contribution to this bug report. -- You received this

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 531208]

2011-11-24 Thread Daniel Stone
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 09:55:19AM -0800, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: Guys, since I get X for free, I’m not expecting anything, and think it’s really nice of you to do this work. But I’m not talking about implementing some colorful clickables or display bling. I’m talking about one

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 584187] Re: [Lucid] Xorg server sometimes fails to start

2010-05-24 Thread Daniel Stone
I noticed similar action when plymouth was changed to alternative -- [Lucid] Xorg server sometimes fails to start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584187 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 in ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 448770] Re: *** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/compiz.real: corrupted double-linked list:

2009-12-08 Thread Daniel Stone
This error no longer exists in current configuration of compiz and nvidia this has the nvidia driver installed on a lower level. marking invalid to close ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- *** glibc detected *** /usr/bin/compiz.real: corrupted