[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3|D Rage IIC [regression]

2014-01-10 Thread MMlosh
The only activity here is me saying Still an issue in ... for each release. And since it's still an issue with Saucy, it means it's still an issue with kernel 3.11 series. Can you please rephrase what you want me to test, if anything? Apport reports cannot be saved locally and uploaded

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3|D Rage IIC [regression]

2014-01-10 Thread MMlosh
** Attachment added: $ apport-cli -f -p xserver-xorg-video-ati --save report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/1071868/+attachment/3945773/+files/report -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1170117] Re: [gm45] Xv video corruption when obstructed by shaped windows (corner case)

2014-01-10 Thread MMlosh
Bug reproduction by The parallelogram does not work anymore. I think I rarely I get to see one/handful-of damaged video line when quickly and randomly shuffling windows around. I can't rule out the possibility that the video I played was corrupted, though. I think it's it's OK to say It fixed

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3|D Rage IIC [regression]

2014-01-10 Thread MMlosh
Wow.. I totally didn't expect this. It actually IS working again with in the 14.04 Trusty It seems the reason why it's not crashing anymore is this snippet from the xorg logfile MACH64(0): Direct rendering is not supported for ATI chips earlier than the ATI 3D Rage Pro. MACH64(0): Render

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3|D Rage IIC [regression]

2014-01-10 Thread MMlosh
Hard to say. I would be fine running Trusty there already... But I discovered an issue with ACPI - ACPI tables won't parse (actually, the last release that works is 13.03 raring) - ACPI is not working - no ATX power-off , no display power management (DPMS) - major usability setback I guess it

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1170117] Re: [gm45] Xv video corruption when obstructed by shaped windows (corner case)

2013-11-10 Thread MMlosh
I found another nice way how to reproduce (this or a similar issue) with a shaped window. program display appears to be creating shaped windows based on the opaque areas of the image. fluxbox is (regardless of the chosen style) still drawing a frame around the hollow window. display the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1170117] Re: [gm45] Xv video corruption when obstructed by shaped windows (corner case)

2013-11-10 Thread MMlosh
EDIT: OOPS, that machine is still running 13.04 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170117 Title: [gm45] Xv video corruption when obstructed by shaped windows

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3|D Rage IIC [regression]

2013-10-19 Thread MMlosh
Still an issue in Saucy ** Tags added: saucy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071868 Title: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3|D Rage IIC [regression] To manage

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162784] Re: [i915] SIGBUS X11 crash from libglx

2013-06-02 Thread MMlosh
I believe that this commit is likely to fix the issue http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=ca9a7d975af228cabb79c3040ec67f26f94f90a2 Unfortunately the binary program is 32bit and mesa/libgl is not willing to cross-compile The commit made it's way into mesa-9.1.2 (Raring has currently

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1170117] Re: [gm45] Xv video corruption when obstructed by shaped windows (corner case)

2013-04-22 Thread MMlosh
It was a bit harder to figure out the position of the topright fbrun this time.. So far it seems to always work when the topright fbrun obstructs one of the red blinking lights. I was unable to reproduce easily with vlc, likely because of it's bottom status bar preventing easy placement of the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1170117] Re: [gm45] Xv video corruption when obstructed by shaped windows (corner case)

2013-04-22 Thread MMlosh
correction: fbrun should be obstructing one or more of the red blinking lights. I usually position it over the three lights that are closer together. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1170117] [NEW] [gm45] Xv video corruption when obstructed by shaped windows (corner case)

2013-04-17 Thread MMlosh
Public bug reported: This is a followup to #1162046 The issue is almost fixed, but the corruption wasn't eradicated completely. This time the actual video content matters (guess: partial frame updates?) ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1170117] Re: [gm45] Xv video corruption when obstructed by shaped windows (corner case)

2013-04-17 Thread MMlosh
a copy of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg- video-intel/+bug/1162046/comments/10 The fix arrived with the updates today. Most of the corruption is gone. Almost all the frames now get though undamaged. Thanks for the fix. BUT Some of the video frames still get damaged

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1170117] Re: [gm45] Xv video corruption when obstructed by shaped windows (corner case)

2013-04-17 Thread MMlosh
** Attachment added: video file I could reproduce with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1170117/+attachment/3646845/+files/testcase.ts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1170117] Re: [gm45] Xv video corruption when obstructed by shaped windows (corner case)

2013-04-17 Thread MMlosh
** Attachment added: window layout example https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1170117/+attachment/3646846/+files/fbrun-layout.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162046] Re: [gm45] Xv video falls apart and flickers when obstructed by 2 windows

2013-04-17 Thread MMlosh
The remaining corner case described in comment#10 is now filled as #1170117 The attachments related to that corner case were moved to that bug. ** Attachment removed: video file I could reproduce with

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162046] Re: [gm45] Xv video falls apart and flickers when obstructed by 2 windows

2013-04-11 Thread MMlosh
The fix arrived with the updates today. Most of the corruption is gone. Almost all the frames now get though undamaged. Thanks for the fix. BUT Some of the video frames still get damaged when drawn. However, it does depend on the video content (and possibly on (absolute) window positions) I

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162046] Re: [gm45] Xv video falls apart and flickers when obstructed by 2 windows

2013-04-11 Thread MMlosh
** Attachment added: video file I could reproduce with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1162046/+attachment/3641317/+files/testcase.ts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162046] Re: [gm45] Xv video falls apart and flickers when obstructed by 2 windows

2013-04-11 Thread MMlosh
** Attachment added: window layout example https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1162046/+attachment/3641318/+files/fbrun-layout.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162784] [NEW] [i915] SIGBUS X11 crash from libglx

2013-04-01 Thread MMlosh
Public bug reported: I have a proprietary application crashing on SIGBUS during a /dev/dri/card0 ioctl Unfortunately that provides no information at all I tried with LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=y and the X11 crashed. Full Xorg logfile is attached. When the X11 crashes this way, I immediately

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162784] Re: [i915] SIGBUS X11 crash from libglx

2013-04-01 Thread MMlosh
** Description changed: - I have a proprietary application crashing on SIGBUS during a /dev/dri/card0 syctl + I have a proprietary application crashing on SIGBUS during a /dev/dri/card0 ioctl Unfortunately that provides no information at all I tried with LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=y and

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162046] Re: [gm45] Xv video falls apart and flickers when obstructed by 2 windows

2013-04-01 Thread MMlosh
Ah.. It is actually dependent on the theme selected in fluxbox. It happens only with themes that have round window corners (bora_*, zimek_*) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162046] Re: [gm45] Xv video falls apart and flickers when obstructed by 2 windows

2013-04-01 Thread MMlosh
Did that help? PS: pekwm's default theme also has round corners. PS2: The video can be even in a paused state. (in VLC that doesn't even stop the flickering, while in mplayer2 it does. But the way how the frame is damaged changes with the position of the obstructing windows) For very small

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162046] Re: [i915] Xv video falls apart and flickers when obstructed by 2 windows

2013-03-30 Thread MMlosh
Sure started X11, played a video, obstructed it, closed X11 ** Attachment added: Xorg.1.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-intel/+bug/1162046/+attachment/3607914/+files/Xorg.1.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1162046] [NEW] [i915] Xv video falls apart and flickers when obstructed by 2 windows

2013-03-29 Thread MMlosh
Public bug reported: Xv video does not paint properly when partially obstructed by multiple windows in certain places. (see the attachment) Note that one of the obstructing windows depicts my attempt to use apport-bug. I tried with mplayer2 and vlc as Xv video players. I tried with Pekwm and

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3|D Rage IIC [regression]

2013-03-08 Thread MMlosh
I started X11 with xinit -- :1 -nolisten tcp and executed sudo -b synaptic three times. Additionally to my password not being accepted the X11 also crashed because of a segfault. The log was the same. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3|D Rage IIC [regression]

2013-03-08 Thread MMlosh
Therefore is is not tied to any window manager, even xterm crashes it under some conditions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071868 Title: X11 segfaults on WM

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3|D Rage IIC [regression]

2013-03-08 Thread MMlosh
Still an issue in Raring. ** Tags added: raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1071868 Title: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3|D Rage IIC [regression] To

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3D Rage IIC [regression]

2013-01-05 Thread MMlosh
** Tags removed: 3d ** Summary changed: - X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3D Rage IIC [regression] + X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI (3)D Rage IIC [regression] ** Description changed: + Fist off - it's ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP (rev 7a) of course. + I changed it to (3)D to stop the bugbot from adding

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3D Rage IIC [regression]

2012-12-27 Thread MMlosh
I am pretty sure that there is no 3D involved. (The card just has 3D in it's name, that's it If you really think that that tag is justified, please re-add it. ** Tags removed: 3d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] Re: X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3D Rage IIC [regression]

2012-11-01 Thread MMlosh
I am pretty sure that none of { the card, fluxbox, pekwm } does 3D The card maybe does some subset of 2D, but the WMs don't Are you sure about the tag? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1071868] [NEW] X11 segfaults on WM start, ATI 3D Rage IIC [regression]

2012-10-26 Thread MMlosh
Public bug reported: After upgrade to oneiric, X11 segfaults on WindowManager start. Tried pekwm and fluxbox so far. Fell free to suggest any other WM for testing. (Except for those that would pull over 0.5Gig of junk in deps) X11 itself seems to start fine. SLiM works, plain xinit works.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1067019] Re: Cannot switch VT [regression]

2012-10-23 Thread MMlosh
Grrr.. something updated, now forcing ureadahead to reprofile doesn't help :( ** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) = upstart (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067019 Title:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1067019] Re: Cannot switch VT [regression]

2012-10-18 Thread MMlosh
Tried removing /var/lib/ureadahead/*pack to force ureadahead reprofile to check the theory. RESULTS: When ureadahead is reprofiling, the issue doesn't occur. I don't point at ureadahead in any way, it probably just plays a role in some sort of race condition. -- You received this bug

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1067019] Re: Cannot switch VT [regression]

2012-10-18 Thread MMlosh
Sorry, it was only a random win as I rebooted. (Or related to the fact that boot after boot-time package update differs from other boots, namely ureadahead gets reprofiled., maybe way more stuff) I tried rebooting several times this time.. No luck, stuff stuck on VT switching syscall, including

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1067019] [NEW] Cannot switch VT [regression]

2012-10-15 Thread MMlosh
Public bug reported: I upgraded my machine to Quantal yesterday to capture the most bad stuff before the release. It works surprisingly well (well, the ugprade process quit two times because it couldn't configure some packages present in both amd64 and i386 variant, but nothing apt-get -f

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1067019] Re: Cannot switch VT [regression]

2012-10-15 Thread MMlosh
** Attachment added: Strace of chvt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1067019/+attachment/3399223/+files/chvt-strace -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067019

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1067019] Re: Cannot switch VT [regression]

2012-10-15 Thread MMlosh
Huh? I ran apt-get update upgrade. Tried to reboot (it hang, presumably doing a VT switch. Had to sysrq+REI (said it's disabled) and SUB(worked) Either fixed, but the only package that could have done that is plymouth, other packages that updated weren't relevant. Or it's a race condition and

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1067019] Re: Cannot switch VT [regression]

2012-10-15 Thread MMlosh
correction: not plymouth. upstart it was! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1067019 Title: Cannot switch VT [regression] To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 338489] Re: AllowDeactivateGrabs is broken

2010-12-30 Thread MMlosh
There is another workaround mentioned in the X.org bug. (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21652) compile a small library and LD_PRELOAD it. That seems to have fewer drawback than global anti-screenlocker feature. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of