[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2014-02-20 Thread kevin gunn
** Tags added: xmir ** Summary changed: - Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request) + [xmir] Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2014-02-02 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Changed in: mir Assignee: Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204939 Title: Unity doesn't start on ATI test

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-12-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-10-07 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Incomplete. No idea what the status of this one is now. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-ati (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-08-22 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Changed in: mir Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204939 Title: Unity doesn't start on ATI test

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-08-22 Thread Daniel van Vugt
I've spent a day trying to figure out how Mir's socket logic could send a message which is never received. So far, I cannot find a theoretical reason. But it's very complicated and I don't properly understand it yet. In the mean time, could someone please reproduce the bug, get it hung and send

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-08-21 Thread Didier Roche
seems this issue is in the radeon driver. We looked with Thomas for a couple of hours this particular issue and came to the conclusion this one seems to appear only when switching from traditional Xorg to a Mir environment back and force after having some GPU load. The radeon driver seems to not

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-08-21 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Multiple drm_auth_magic calls suggests multiple screens. Is that true? What is a screen in this context anyway? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204939 Title:

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-08-21 Thread Didier Roche
@Daniel: I know there is at least one real monitor connected, people in Lexington will know if we have more than that. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-ati in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1204939

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-08-21 Thread Daniel van Vugt
The scenario described in comment #25 is not really a common real world use case. I for one expect lightdm/X to not restart properly in switching between X and XMir. It's just never worked very reliably in doing so. And that's true for intel graphics too, in my experience. So have we ever seen

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-08-21 Thread Didier Roche
Hence the email I'm about to send an emailtelling we are not blocking Mir to release to distro. Though, we are not 100% sure it's the real issue, just a high probability. The ATI machine can't be used as of now for this testing, I keep it free (in the same state, with the same package and no

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-08-21 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Question: Are there any processes which stay resident across iterations switching between X and XMir? Like unity-system-compositor? If so, can you please check the fd's and memory of such processes to see if we're leaking something? If the problem is in user space then we have much more chance of

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-08-21 Thread Didier Roche
Le 21/08/2013 14:18, Daniel van Vugt a écrit : Question: Are there any processes which stay resident across iterations switching between X and XMir? Like unity-system-compositor? If so, can you please check the fd's and memory of such processes to see if we're leaking something? If the

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1204939] Re: Unity doesn't start on ATI test machine (Mir fails to respond to drm_auth_magic request)

2013-08-21 Thread kevin gunn
just to add some additional information from this morning's debug not captured here. it seems with the latest archive (Aug 21) that the problem exhibits itself sometimes on a first install - but upon reboot will not occur again. the current thinking is that installing over and over is corner