[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1609110] Re: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/?

2016-08-05 Thread Bryan Quigley
>the linux opengl abi requires that libGL.so is in /usr/lib(/) Does /usr/lib(//mesa not count? I also have it in /usr/lib/nvidia-364/libGL.so. If this breaks existing things in some way I'm missing obviously that wins out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1609110] Re: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/?

2016-08-04 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "Drop libGL.so symlink" seems to be a debdiff. The ubuntu-sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. If the attachment isn't a patch, please remove the "patch" flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1609110] Re: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/?

2016-08-04 Thread Timo Aaltonen
the linux opengl abi requires that libGL.so is in /usr/lib(/) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1609110 Title: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/? To

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1609110] Re: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/?

2016-08-04 Thread Bryan Quigley
What about just getting rid of the: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so symlink? It's provided by libgl1-mesa-dev. I have the nvidia driver installed and it libGL.so (above) is still symlinked to mesa. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1609110] Re: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/?

2016-08-04 Thread Timo Aaltonen
the alternates handling was supposed to be less brittle than diversions (what debian does for fglrx/nvidia). Now that fglrx is no more there's still nvidia, and it creates libGL.so symlinks as well. libglvnd will hopefully make these obsolete at some point in the future, but we're not there yet

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1609110] Re: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/?

2016-08-04 Thread Bryan Quigley
@Timo Does this make sense to you? Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1609110 Title: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/? To manage

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1609110] Re: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/?

2016-08-04 Thread Bryan Quigley
Alternatively dropping just the /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so symlink is consistent with what we currently do and makes the Wine build work fine (see https://launchpad.net/~bryanquigley/+archive/ubuntu/wine- sync-testing/+packages - arm failures are unrelated). It's just the mesa dev package

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1609110] Re: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/?

2016-08-04 Thread Bryan Quigley
I ran the wine build before mesa arm build had finished. This blocks both syncing wine (needs more work) and wine-development (has been syncing now stuck in proposed). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 1609110] Re: Do we still need the mesa or mesa-egl directories in /usr/lib/?

2016-08-03 Thread Bryan Quigley
Was pointed out that this might be a partial rehash of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics- drivers/+bug/589250. However I don't see us needing to have a mesa directory for that plan to work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which