[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-25 Thread Zack Evans
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 376092 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376092 Bryce: Yep, I think this is now effectively a dupe, and I'd forgotten this only affected EXA. Thanks, another one off the list! -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-25 Thread Zack Evans
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 376092 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376092 Bryce: Yep, I think this is now effectively a dupe, and I'd forgotten this only affected UXA. Thanks, another one off the list! -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-23 Thread Zack Evans
Been looking through changelogs for the version Bob Manners and I have been going through... I can see there are several memory leaks that might have been the culprit that have been fixed recently, or that had been fixed in drivers way in advance of what I was running. Bob: your bug, but suggest

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-23 Thread Bryce Harrington
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 376092 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/376092 This sounds a lot like bug #376092, which I'm about to upload the patch for, along with the patch for bug #360319 (another memory leak). I'm going to dupe this to #376092. (Both of these are actually bugs

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-15 Thread Bob Manners
Hi there - just a quick update. I have been running with 2.6.30 for a couple of days now, with a relatively light workload under KDE4. My overall impression is that this problem has either been fixed or that the leak which is probably the root cause of this is at least much slower now! After

Re: [Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-15 Thread Nizamov Shawkat
I am also confident that bug had gone after upgrading to kernel 2.6.30 and using intel video drivers (from x-swat ppa) that default to older acceleration architecture (EXA). -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367377 You received this

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-12 Thread Mike.lifeguard
2.6.30 was released - give it a try? -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-12 Thread Rocko
I don't know if this is specifically an intel bug. I sometimes see the same thing occur and I'm using nvidia. It happened again just now: the PC was doing nothing all night, but when I returned to it and pressed a key to stop the screensaver, X had become unresponsive due to disk thrashing. I

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-08 Thread Zack Evans
There were lots of changes to this area of DRM in 2.6.30rc7 and rc8 - could be worth trying this kernel and seeing if the problem goes away? If it does I don't think it will be too hard to identify the exact changes which fixed it... -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason -

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-08 Thread Bob Manners
I can confirm that this still occurs with 2.6.20rc7: b...@gecko2:~$ uname -a Linux gecko2 2.6.30-020630rc7-generic #020630rc7 SMP Sun May 24 01:38:23 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367377 You received this

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-06-08 Thread Bob Manners
Sorry - I meant 2.6.30-rc7 of course! -- High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to xserver-xorg-video-intel in ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-05-21 Thread Nizamov Shawkat
I also experience the same bug on notebook with i945 chipset with Ubuntu Jaunty. Symptoms are the same - at some point system becomes irresponsive, disk activity is such high that the only option is to power-off the notebook. As I was experiencing it rather frequently I had open consoles with

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 367377] Re: High load average, disk read, no apparent reason - 2.6.28-11

2009-05-21 Thread Chow Loong Jin
I'm confirming this. My restart X cycle happens at approximately once every 5 or 6 hours of usage. The symptoms are exactly as mentioned, but with an addition. /proc/dri/0/gem_objects shows a large number of GEM objects allocated, but the number of GEM objects does not really matter. What