[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2017-01-11 Thread Timo Aaltonen
nope, libraries should just be migrated to support multiarch, like libglu 9.0.0-2.1 ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2015-02-08 Thread Ian Mallett
The second workaround does not work with apt-get; e.g.: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libglu1-mesa-dev : Conflicts: libglu1-mesa-dev:i386 but 9.0.0-2 is to be installed libglu1-mesa-dev:i386 : Conflicts: libglu1-mesa-dev but 9.0.0-2 is to be installed E: Unable to correct

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2014-11-28 Thread Rocko
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1246013 Would be nice for libgl1-mesa-dev to be multiarched -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2014-05-14 Thread Timo Aaltonen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1246013 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246013 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1246013 Whould be nice for libgl1-mesa-dev to be multiarched -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2014-04-27 Thread Flames_in_Paradise
Even in the press already:, as this regards trusty too: http://www.webupd8.org/2014/04/install-google-earth-in-ubuntu-1404.html Also we can find quite a few people who suffered this with the LTS- Enablement-Stacks-Support... and Installations of any offcial flavour 12.04.1 -- You received

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2012-10-05 Thread Andre Haas
Want to install Wine on my 64bit Ubuntu and get the error: The following packages have unmet dependencies: wine1.4: PreDepends: dpkg (= 1.15.7.2~) but 1.16.1.2ubuntu7 is to be installed Depends: libc6 (= 2.14) but 2.15-0ubuntu10.2 is to be installed Depends: wine1.4-amd64 (=

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2012-09-19 Thread Darko Veberic
we have similar situation here in CERN where some legacy software requires 32 bit compiling and it is impossible to keep dependencies needed by ROOT in 32 bit installed alongside the 64 bit libraries. just to name a few library and -dev packages that are broken in such a way: libcppunit, libxft,

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2012-09-19 Thread Darko Veberic
the same also with libpng... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2012-06-25 Thread Eric Appleman
Wine can not be properly built on amd64 by end-users until this bug is fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2012-03-08 Thread Timo Aaltonen
the conflicts just need to be fixed ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2012-03-08 Thread Rocko
So the conflicts with have just been incorrectly set - it's not just because the i386 and amd64 packages supply the same files and therefore overwrite each other (and purging one of them will affect the other)? There are a number of packages that fall into this category: is it something that can

[Ubuntu-x-swat] [Bug 949606] Re: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file

2012-03-07 Thread Rocko
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/949606 Title: 64 bit dev packages should include 32 bit .so library file To manage notifications about this bug go to: